{-# LANGUAGE NondecreasingIndentation #-} module Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Def where import Prelude hiding ( mapM, null ) import Control.Arrow (first,second) import Control.Monad.State hiding (forM, mapM) import Data.Function import Data.IntSet (IntSet) import qualified Data.IntSet as IntSet import qualified Data.List as List import Data.Maybe import Data.Traversable (forM, mapM) import Data.Semigroup (Semigroup((<>))) import Data.Tuple ( swap ) import Agda.Interaction.Options import Agda.Syntax.Common import qualified Agda.Syntax.Concrete as C import Agda.Syntax.Position import Agda.Syntax.Abstract.Pattern as A import qualified Agda.Syntax.Abstract as A import qualified Agda.Syntax.Abstract.Views as A import Agda.Syntax.Internal as I import Agda.Syntax.Internal.Pattern as I import qualified Agda.Syntax.Info as Info import Agda.Syntax.Fixity import Agda.Syntax.Info import Agda.TypeChecking.Monad import Agda.TypeChecking.Monad.Builtin import qualified Agda.TypeChecking.Monad.Benchmark as Bench import Agda.TypeChecking.Warnings ( warning ) import Agda.TypeChecking.Constraints import Agda.TypeChecking.Conversion import Agda.TypeChecking.Coverage.SplitTree import Agda.TypeChecking.Inlining import Agda.TypeChecking.Reduce import Agda.TypeChecking.Patterns.Abstract (expandPatternSynonyms) import Agda.TypeChecking.Pretty import Agda.TypeChecking.Substitute import Agda.TypeChecking.CheckInternal import Agda.TypeChecking.With import Agda.TypeChecking.Telescope import Agda.TypeChecking.Injectivity import Agda.TypeChecking.Irrelevance import Agda.TypeChecking.SizedTypes.Solve import Agda.TypeChecking.Rewriting.Confluence import Agda.TypeChecking.CompiledClause (CompiledClauses'(..), hasProjectionPatterns) import Agda.TypeChecking.CompiledClause.Compile import Agda.TypeChecking.Primitive hiding (Nat) import Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Term import Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.LHS ( checkLeftHandSide, LHSResult(..), bindAsPatterns ) import {-# SOURCE #-} Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Decl ( checkDecls ) import Agda.Utils.Except ( MonadError(catchError) ) import Agda.Utils.Functor import Agda.Utils.Lens import Agda.Utils.List import Agda.Utils.Maybe import Agda.Utils.Monad import Agda.Utils.Null import Agda.Utils.Permutation import Agda.Utils.Pretty ( prettyShow ) import qualified Agda.Utils.Pretty as P import Agda.Utils.Size import Agda.Utils.Impossible --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Definitions by pattern matching --------------------------------------------------------------------------- checkFunDef :: Delayed -> A.DefInfo -> QName -> [A.Clause] -> TCM () checkFunDef delayed i name cs = do -- Reset blocking tag (in case a previous attempt was blocked) modifySignature $ updateDefinition name $ updateDefBlocked $ const $ NotBlocked MissingClauses () -- Get the type and relevance of the function def <- instantiateDef =<< getConstInfo name let t = defType def let info = getArgInfo def case isAlias cs t of Just (e, mc, x) -> traceCall (CheckFunDefCall (getRange i) name cs) $ do -- Andreas, 2012-11-22: if the alias is in an abstract block -- it has been frozen. We unfreeze it to enable type inference. -- See issue 729. whenM (isFrozen x) $ unfreezeMeta x checkAlias t info delayed i name e mc _ -> checkFunDef' t info delayed Nothing Nothing i name cs -- If it's a macro check that it ends in Term → TC ⊤ let ismacro = isMacro . theDef $ def when (ismacro || Info.defMacro i == MacroDef) $ checkMacroType t `catchIlltypedPatternBlockedOnMeta` \ (err, x) -> do reportSDoc "tc.def" 20 $ vcat $ [ "checking function definition got stuck on meta: " <+> text (show x) ] modifySignature $ updateDefinition name $ updateDefBlocked $ const $ Blocked x () addConstraint $ CheckFunDef delayed i name cs checkMacroType :: Type -> TCM () checkMacroType t = do t' <- normalise t TelV tel tr <- telView t' let telList = telToList tel resType = abstract (telFromList (drop (length telList - 1) telList)) tr expectedType <- el primAgdaTerm --> el (primAgdaTCM <#> primLevelZero <@> primUnit) equalType resType expectedType `catchError` \ _ -> typeError . GenericDocError =<< sep [ "Result type of a macro must be" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM expectedType ] -- | A single clause without arguments and without type signature is an alias. isAlias :: [A.Clause] -> Type -> Maybe (A.Expr, Maybe C.Expr, MetaId) isAlias cs t = case trivialClause cs of -- if we have just one clause without pattern matching and -- without a type signature, then infer, to allow -- "aliases" for things starting with hidden abstractions Just (e, mc) | Just x <- isMeta (unEl t) -> Just (e, mc, x) _ -> Nothing where isMeta (MetaV x _) = Just x isMeta _ = Nothing trivialClause [A.Clause (A.LHS i (A.LHSHead f [])) _ (A.RHS e mc) (A.WhereDecls _ []) _] = Just (e, mc) trivialClause _ = Nothing -- | Check a trivial definition of the form @f = e@ checkAlias :: Type -> ArgInfo -> Delayed -> A.DefInfo -> QName -> A.Expr -> Maybe C.Expr -> TCM () checkAlias t ai delayed i name e mc = let clause = A.Clause { clauseLHS = A.SpineLHS (LHSInfo (getRange i) NoEllipsis) name [] , clauseStrippedPats = [] , clauseRHS = A.RHS e mc , clauseWhereDecls = A.noWhereDecls , clauseCatchall = False } in atClause name 0 t Nothing clause $ do reportSDoc "tc.def.alias" 10 $ "checkAlias" <+> vcat [ text (prettyShow name) <+> colon <+> prettyTCM t , text (prettyShow name) <+> equals <+> prettyTCM e ] -- Infer the type of the rhs. -- Andreas, 2018-06-09, issue #2170. -- The context will only be resurrected if we have --irrelevant-projections. v <- applyModalityToContextFunBody ai $ checkDontExpandLast CmpLeq e t reportSDoc "tc.def.alias" 20 $ "checkAlias: finished checking" solveSizeConstraints DontDefaultToInfty v <- instantiateFull v -- if we omit this, we loop (stdlib: Relation.Binary.Sum) -- or the termination checker might stumble over levels in sorts -- that cannot be converted to expressions without the level built-ins -- (test/succeed/Issue655.agda) -- compute body modification for irrelevant definitions, see issue 610 let bodyMod = case getRelevance ai of Irrelevant -> dontCare _ -> id -- Add the definition addConstant name $ defaultDefn ai name t $ set funMacro (Info.defMacro i == MacroDef) $ emptyFunction { funClauses = [ Clause -- trivial clause @name = v@ { clauseLHSRange = getRange i , clauseFullRange = getRange i , clauseTel = EmptyTel , namedClausePats = [] , clauseBody = Just $ bodyMod v , clauseType = Just $ Arg ai t , clauseCatchall = False , clauseRecursive = Nothing -- we don't know yet , clauseUnreachable = Just False , clauseEllipsis = NoEllipsis } ] , funCompiled = Just $ Done [] $ bodyMod v , funSplitTree = Just $ SplittingDone 0 , funDelayed = delayed , funAbstr = Info.defAbstract i } -- Andreas, 2017-01-01, issue #2372: -- Add the definition to the instance table, if needed, to update its type. case Info.defInstance i of InstanceDef _r -> setCurrentRange name $ addTypedInstance name t -- Put highlighting on the name only; -- @(getRange (r, name))@ does not give good results. NotInstanceDef -> pure () reportSDoc "tc.def.alias" 20 $ "checkAlias: leaving" -- | Type check a definition by pattern matching. checkFunDef' :: Type -- ^ the type we expect the function to have -> ArgInfo -- ^ is it irrelevant (for instance) -> Delayed -- ^ are the clauses delayed (not unfolded willy-nilly) -> Maybe ExtLamInfo -- ^ does the definition come from an extended lambda -- (if so, we need to know some stuff about lambda-lifted args) -> Maybe QName -- ^ is it a with function (if so, what's the name of the parent function) -> A.DefInfo -- ^ range info -> QName -- ^ the name of the function -> [A.Clause] -- ^ the clauses to check -> TCM () checkFunDef' t ai delayed extlam with i name cs = checkFunDefS t ai delayed extlam with i name Nothing cs -- | Type check a definition by pattern matching. checkFunDefS :: Type -- ^ the type we expect the function to have -> ArgInfo -- ^ is it irrelevant (for instance) -> Delayed -- ^ are the clauses delayed (not unfolded willy-nilly) -> Maybe ExtLamInfo -- ^ does the definition come from an extended lambda -- (if so, we need to know some stuff about lambda-lifted args) -> Maybe QName -- ^ is it a with function (if so, what's the name of the parent function) -> A.DefInfo -- ^ range info -> QName -- ^ the name of the function -> Maybe Substitution -- ^ substitution (from with abstraction) that needs to be applied to module parameters -> [A.Clause] -- ^ the clauses to check -> TCM () checkFunDefS t ai delayed extlam with i name withSub cs = do traceCall (CheckFunDefCall (getRange i) name cs) $ do reportSDoc "tc.def.fun" 10 $ sep [ "checking body of" <+> prettyTCM name , nest 2 $ ":" <+> prettyTCM t , nest 2 $ "full type:" <+> (prettyTCM . defType =<< getConstInfo name) ] reportSDoc "tc.def.fun" 70 $ sep $ [ "clauses:" ] ++ map (nest 2 . text . show . A.deepUnscope) cs cs <- return $ map A.lhsToSpine cs reportSDoc "tc.def.fun" 70 $ sep $ [ "spine clauses:" ] ++ map (nest 2 . text . show . A.deepUnscope) cs -- Ensure that all clauses have the same number of trailing hidden patterns -- This is necessary since trailing implicits are no longer eagerly inserted. -- Andreas, 2013-10-13 -- Since we have flexible function arity, it is no longer necessary -- to patch clauses to same arity -- cs <- trailingImplicits t cs -- Check the clauses cs <- traceCall NoHighlighting $ do -- To avoid flicker. forM (zip cs [0..]) $ \ (c, clauseNo) -> do atClause name clauseNo t withSub c $ do (c,b) <- applyModalityToContextFunBody ai $ do checkClause t withSub c -- Andreas, 2013-11-23 do not solve size constraints here yet -- in case we are checking the body of an extended lambda. -- 2014-04-24: The size solver requires each clause to be -- checked individually, since otherwise we get constraints -- in typing contexts which are not prefixes of each other. whenNothing extlam $ solveSizeConstraints DontDefaultToInfty -- Andreas, 2013-10-27 add clause as soon it is type-checked -- TODO: instantiateFull? inTopContext $ addClauses name [c] return (c,b) (cs, CPC isOneIxs) <- return $ (second mconcat . unzip) cs let isSystem = not . null $ isOneIxs canBeSystem <- do -- allow VarP and ConP i0/i1 fallThrough = yes, DotP let pss = map namedClausePats cs allowed p = case p of VarP{} -> True -- pattern inserted by splitPartial ConP _ cpi [] | conPFallThrough cpi -> True DotP{} -> True _ -> False return $! all (allowed . namedArg) (concat pss) when isSystem $ unless canBeSystem $ typeError $ GenericError "no pattern matching or path copatterns in systems!" reportSDoc "tc.def.fun" 70 $ inTopContext $ do sep $ [ "checked clauses:" ] ++ map (nest 2 . text . show) cs -- After checking, remove the clauses again. -- (Otherwise, @checkInjectivity@ loops for issue 801). modifyFunClauses name (const []) reportSDoc "tc.cc" 25 $ inTopContext $ do sep [ "clauses before injectivity test" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM $ map (QNamed name) cs -- broken, reify (QNamed n cl) expect cl to live at top level ] reportSDoc "tc.cc" 60 $ inTopContext $ do sep [ "raw clauses: " , nest 2 $ sep $ map (text . show . QNamed name) cs ] -- Needed to calculate the proper fullType below. -- Also: issue #4173, allow splitting on erased arguments in erased definitions -- in the coverage checker. applyCohesionToContext ai $ applyQuantityToContext ai $ do -- Systems have their own coverage and "coherence" check, we -- also add an absurd clause for the cases not needed. (cs,sys) <- if not isSystem then return (cs, empty) else do fullType <- flip abstract t <$> getContextTelescope sys <- inTopContext $ checkSystemCoverage name (IntSet.toList isOneIxs) fullType cs tel <- getContextTelescope let c = Clause { clauseFullRange = noRange , clauseLHSRange = noRange , clauseTel = tel , namedClausePats = teleNamedArgs tel , clauseBody = Nothing , clauseType = Just (defaultArg t) , clauseCatchall = False , clauseRecursive = Just False , clauseUnreachable = Just False , clauseEllipsis = NoEllipsis } return (cs ++ [c], pure sys) -- Annotate the clauses with which arguments are actually used. cs <- instantiateFull {- =<< mapM rebindClause -} cs -- Andreas, 2010-11-12 -- rebindClause is the identity, and instantiateFull eta-contracts -- removing this eta-contraction fixes issue 361 -- however, Data.Star.Decoration.gmapAll no longer type-checks -- possibly due to missing eta-contraction!? -- Check if the function is injective. -- Andreas, 2015-07-01 we do it here in order to resolve metas -- in mutual definitions, e.g. the U/El definition in succeed/Issue439.agda -- We do it again for the mutual block after termination checking, see Rules.Decl. reportSLn "tc.inj.def" 20 $ "checkFunDef': checking injectivity..." inv <- Bench.billTo [Bench.Injectivity] $ checkInjectivity name cs reportSDoc "tc.cc" 15 $ inTopContext $ do sep [ "clauses before compilation" , nest 2 $ sep $ map (prettyTCM . QNamed name) cs ] reportSDoc "tc.cc.raw" 65 $ do sep [ "clauses before compilation" , nest 2 $ sep $ map (text . show) cs ] -- add clauses for the coverage (& confluence) checker (needs to reduce) inTopContext $ addClauses name cs reportSDoc "tc.cc.type" 60 $ " type : " <+> (text . prettyShow) t reportSDoc "tc.cc.type" 60 $ " context: " <+> (text . prettyShow =<< getContextTelescope) fullType <- flip telePi t <$> getContextTelescope reportSLn "tc.cc.type" 80 $ show fullType -- Coverage check and compile the clauses (mst, _recordExpressionBecameCopatternLHS, cc) <- Bench.billTo [Bench.Coverage] $ unsafeInTopContext $ compileClauses (if isSystem then Nothing else (Just (name, fullType))) cs -- Andreas, 2019-10-21 (see also issue #4142): -- We ignore whether the clause compilation turned some -- record expressions into copatterns -- (_recordExpressionsBecameCopatternLHS), -- since the defCopatternLHS flag is anyway set by traversing -- the compiled clauses looking for a copattern match -- (hasProjectionPatterns). -- Clause compilation runs the coverage checker, which might add -- some extra clauses. cs <- defClauses <$> getConstInfo name reportSDoc "tc.cc" 60 $ inTopContext $ do sep [ "compiled clauses of" <+> prettyTCM name , nest 2 $ pretty cc ] -- The macro tag might be on the type signature ismacro <- isMacro . theDef <$> getConstInfo name covering <- funCovering . theDef <$> getConstInfo name -- Jesper, 2019-05-30: if the constructors used in the -- lhs of a clause have rewrite rules, we need to check -- confluence here whenM (optConfluenceCheck <$> pragmaOptions) $ inTopContext $ forM_ (zip cs [0..]) $ \(c , clauseNo) -> checkConfluenceOfClause name clauseNo c -- Add the definition inTopContext $ addConstant name =<< do -- If there was a pragma for this definition, we can set the -- funTerminates field directly. defn <- autoInline $ set funMacro (ismacro || Info.defMacro i == MacroDef) $ emptyFunction { funClauses = cs , funCompiled = Just cc , funSplitTree = mst , funDelayed = delayed , funInv = inv , funAbstr = Info.defAbstract i , funExtLam = (\ e -> e { extLamSys = sys }) <$> extlam , funWith = with , funCovering = covering } useTerPragma $ updateDefCopatternLHS (const $ hasProjectionPatterns cc) $ defaultDefn ai name fullType defn reportSDoc "tc.def.fun" 10 $ do sep [ "added " <+> prettyTCM name <+> ":" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM . defType =<< getConstInfo name ] -- | Set 'funTerminates' according to termination info in 'TCEnv', -- which comes from a possible termination pragma. useTerPragma :: Definition -> TCM Definition useTerPragma def@Defn{ defName = name, theDef = fun@Function{}} = do tc <- viewTC eTerminationCheck let terminates = case tc of NonTerminating -> Just False Terminating -> Just True _ -> Nothing reportS "tc.fundef" 30 $ [ "funTerminates of " ++ prettyShow name ++ " set to " ++ show terminates , " tc = " ++ show tc ] return $ def { theDef = fun { funTerminates = terminates }} useTerPragma def = return def -- | Insert some with-patterns into the with-clauses LHS of the given RHS. -- (Used for @rewrite@.) insertPatterns :: [A.Pattern] -> A.RHS -> A.RHS insertPatterns pats = \case A.WithRHS aux es cs -> A.WithRHS aux es $ for cs $ \ (A.Clause (A.LHS info core) spats rhs ds catchall) -> A.Clause (A.LHS info (insertPatternsLHSCore pats core)) spats (insertPatterns pats rhs) ds catchall A.RewriteRHS qes spats rhs wh -> A.RewriteRHS qes spats (insertPatterns pats rhs) wh rhs@A.AbsurdRHS -> rhs rhs@A.RHS{} -> rhs -- | Insert with-patterns before the trailing with patterns. -- If there are none, append the with-patterns. insertPatternsLHSCore :: [A.Pattern] -> A.LHSCore -> A.LHSCore insertPatternsLHSCore pats = \case A.LHSWith core wps [] -> A.LHSWith core (pats ++ wps) [] core -> A.LHSWith core pats [] -- | Parameters for creating a @with@-function. data WithFunctionProblem = NoWithFunction | WithFunction { wfParentName :: QName -- ^ Parent function name. , wfName :: QName -- ^ With function name. , wfParentType :: Type -- ^ Type of the parent function. , wfParentTel :: Telescope -- ^ Context of the parent patterns. , wfBeforeTel :: Telescope -- ^ Types of arguments to the with function before the with expressions (needed vars). , wfAfterTel :: Telescope -- ^ Types of arguments to the with function after the with expressions (unneeded vars). , wfExprs :: [WithHiding (Term, EqualityView)] -- ^ With and rewrite expressions and their types. , wfRHSType :: Type -- ^ Type of the right hand side. , wfParentPats :: [NamedArg DeBruijnPattern] -- ^ Parent patterns. , wfParentParams :: Nat -- ^ Number of module parameters in parent patterns , wfPermSplit :: Permutation -- ^ Permutation resulting from splitting the telescope into needed and unneeded vars. , wfPermParent :: Permutation -- ^ Permutation reordering the variables in the parent pattern. , wfPermFinal :: Permutation -- ^ Final permutation (including permutation for the parent clause). , wfClauses :: [A.Clause] -- ^ The given clauses for the with function } checkSystemCoverage :: QName -> [Int] -> Type -> [Clause] -> TCM System checkSystemCoverage f [n] t cs = do reportSDoc "tc.sys.cover" 10 $ text (show (n , length cs)) <+> prettyTCM t TelV gamma t <- telViewUpTo n t addContext gamma $ do TelV (ExtendTel a _) _ <- telViewUpTo 1 t a <- reduce $ unEl $ unDom a case a of Def q [Apply phi] -> do [iz,io] <- mapM getBuiltinName' [builtinIZero, builtinIOne] ineg <- primINeg imin <- primIMin imax <- primIMax i0 <- primIZero i1 <- primIOne let isDir (ConP q _ []) | Just (conName q) == iz = Just False isDir (ConP q _ []) | Just (conName q) == io = Just True isDir _ = Nothing collectDirs :: [Int] -> [DeBruijnPattern] -> [(Int,Bool)] collectDirs [] [] = [] collectDirs (i : is) (p : ps) | Just d <- isDir p = (i,d) : collectDirs is ps | otherwise = collectDirs is ps collectDirs _ _ = __IMPOSSIBLE__ dir :: (Int,Bool) -> Term dir (i,False) = ineg `apply` [argN $ var i] dir (i,True) = var i -- andI and orI have cases for singletons to improve error messages. andI, orI :: [Term] -> Term andI [] = i1 andI [t] = t andI (t:ts) = (\ x -> imin `apply` [argN t, argN x]) $ andI ts orI [] = i0 orI [t] = t orI (t:ts) = imax `apply` [argN t, argN (orI ts)] let pats = map (take n . map (namedThing . unArg) . namedClausePats) cs alphas :: [[(Int,Bool)]] -- the face maps corresponding to each clause alphas = map (collectDirs (downFrom n)) pats phis :: [Term] -- the φ terms for each clause (i.e. the alphas as terms) phis = map andI $ map (map dir) alphas psi = orI $ phis pcs = zip phis cs boolToI True = i1 boolToI False = i0 reportSDoc "tc.sys.cover" 20 $ fsep $ map prettyTCM pats interval <- elInf primInterval reportSDoc "tc.sys.cover" 10 $ "equalTerm " <+> prettyTCM (unArg phi) <+> prettyTCM psi equalTerm interval (unArg phi) psi forM_ (init $ init $ List.tails pcs) $ \ ((phi1,cl1):pcs') -> do forM_ pcs' $ \ (phi2,cl2) -> do phi12 <- reduce (imin `apply` [argN phi1, argN phi2]) forallFaceMaps phi12 (\ _ _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__) $ \ sigma -> do let args = sigma `applySubst` teleArgs gamma t' = sigma `applySubst` t fromReduced (YesReduction _ x) = x fromReduced (NoReduction x) = ignoreBlocking x body cl = do let extra = length (drop n $ namedClausePats cl) TelV delta _ <- telViewUpTo extra t' fmap (abstract delta) $ addContext delta $ do fmap fromReduced $ runReduceM $ appDef' (Def f []) [cl] [] (map notReduced $ raise (size delta) args ++ teleArgs delta) v1 <- body cl1 v2 <- body cl2 equalTerm t' v1 v2 sys <- forM (zip alphas cs) $ \ (alpha,cl) -> do let -- Δ = Γ_α , Δ'α delta = clauseTel cl -- Δ ⊢ b Just b = clauseBody cl -- Δ ⊢ ps : Γ , o : [φ] , Δ' -- we assume that there's no pattern matching other -- than from the system ps = namedClausePats cl extra = length (drop (size gamma + 1) ps) -- size Δ'α = size Δ' = extra -- Γ , α ⊢ u takeLast n xs = drop (length xs - n) xs weak [] = idS weak (i:is) = weak is `composeS` liftS i (raiseS 1) tel = telFromList (takeLast extra (telToList delta)) u = abstract tel (liftS extra (weak $ List.sort $ map fst alpha) `applySubst` b) return (map (first var) alpha,u) reportSDoc "tc.sys.cover.sys" 20 $ fsep $ prettyTCM gamma : map prettyTCM sys reportSDoc "tc.sys.cover.sys" 40 $ fsep $ (text . show) gamma : map (text . show) sys return (System gamma sys) -- gamma uses names from the type, not the patterns, could we do better? _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ checkSystemCoverage _ _ t cs = __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- * Info that is needed after all clauses have been processed. data ClausesPostChecks = CPC { cpcPartialSplits :: IntSet -- ^ Which argument indexes have a partial split. } instance Semigroup ClausesPostChecks where CPC xs <> CPC xs' = CPC (IntSet.union xs xs') instance Monoid ClausesPostChecks where mempty = CPC empty mappend = (<>) -- | The LHS part of checkClause. checkClauseLHS :: Type -> Maybe Substitution -> A.SpineClause -> (LHSResult -> TCM a) -> TCM a checkClauseLHS t withSub c@(A.Clause lhs@(A.SpineLHS i x aps) strippedPats rhs0 wh catchall) ret = do reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 30 $ "Checking clause" $$ prettyA c unlessNull (trailingWithPatterns aps) $ \ withPats -> do typeError $ UnexpectedWithPatterns $ map namedArg withPats traceCall (CheckClause t c) $ do aps <- expandPatternSynonyms aps when (not $ null strippedPats) $ reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 50 $ "strippedPats:" <+> vcat [ prettyA p <+> "=" <+> prettyTCM v <+> ":" <+> prettyTCM a | A.ProblemEq p v a <- strippedPats ] closed_t <- flip abstract t <$> getContextTelescope checkLeftHandSide (CheckLHS lhs) (Just x) aps t withSub strippedPats ret -- | Type check a function clause. checkClause :: Type -- ^ Type of function defined by this clause. -> Maybe Substitution -- ^ Module parameter substitution arising from with-abstraction. -> A.SpineClause -- ^ Clause. -> TCM (Clause,ClausesPostChecks) -- ^ Type-checked clause checkClause t withSub c@(A.Clause lhs@(A.SpineLHS i x aps) strippedPats rhs0 wh catchall) = do cxtNames <- reverse . map (fst . unDom) <$> getContext checkClauseLHS t withSub c $ \ lhsResult@(LHSResult npars delta ps absurdPat trhs patSubst asb psplit) -> do -- Note that we might now be in irrelevant context, -- in case checkLeftHandSide walked over an irrelevant projection pattern. -- Subtle: checkRHS expects the function type to be the lambda lifted -- type. If we're checking a with-function that's already the case, -- otherwise we need to abstract over the module telescope. t' <- case withSub of Just{} -> return t Nothing -> do theta <- lookupSection (qnameModule x) return $ abstract theta t -- At this point we should update the named dots potential with-clauses -- in the right-hand side. When checking a clause we expect the named -- dots to live in the context of the closest parent lhs, but the named -- dots added by buildWithFunction live in the context of the -- with-function arguments before pattern matching. That's what we need -- patSubst for. let rhs = updateRHS rhs0 updateRHS rhs@A.RHS{} = rhs updateRHS rhs@A.AbsurdRHS{} = rhs updateRHS (A.WithRHS q es cs) = A.WithRHS q es (map updateClause cs) updateRHS (A.RewriteRHS qes spats rhs wh) = A.RewriteRHS qes (applySubst patSubst spats) (updateRHS rhs) wh updateClause (A.Clause f spats rhs wh ca) = A.Clause f (applySubst patSubst spats) (updateRHS rhs) wh ca (body, with) <- bindAsPatterns asb $ checkWhere wh $ checkRHS i x aps t' lhsResult rhs -- Note that the with function doesn't necessarily share any part of -- the context with the parent (but withSub will take you from parent -- to child). unsafeInTopContext $ Bench.billTo [Bench.Typing, Bench.With] $ checkWithFunction cxtNames with whenM (optDoubleCheck <$> pragmaOptions) $ case body of Just v -> do reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 30 $ vcat [ "double checking rhs" , nest 2 (prettyTCM v <+> " : " <+> prettyTCM (unArg trhs)) ] noConstraints $ dontAssignMetas $ checkInternal v CmpLeq $ unArg trhs Nothing -> return () reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 10 $ vcat [ "Clause before translation:" , nest 2 $ vcat [ "delta =" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ prettyTCM delta , "ps =" <+> do P.fsep <$> prettyTCMPatterns ps , "body =" <+> maybe "_|_" prettyTCM body , "type =" <+> prettyTCM t ] ] reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 60 $ escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ vcat [ "Clause before translation (raw):" , nest 2 $ vcat [ "ps =" <+> text (show ps) , "body =" <+> text (show body) , "type =" <+> text (show t) ] ] -- check naturality wrt the interval. let iApplyVars :: [NamedArg DeBruijnPattern] -> [(Int, (Term,Term))] iApplyVars ps = flip concatMap (map namedArg ps) $ \case IApplyP _ t u x -> [(dbPatVarIndex x,(t,u))] VarP{} -> [] ProjP{}-> [] LitP{} -> [] DotP{} -> [] DefP _ _ ps -> iApplyVars ps ConP _ _ ps -> iApplyVars ps -- compute body modification for irrelevant definitions, see issue 610 rel <- asksTC getRelevance let bodyMod body = case rel of Irrelevant -> dontCare <$> body _ -> body -- absurd clauses don't define computational behaviour, so it's fine to -- treat them as catchalls. let catchall' = catchall || isNothing body return $ (, CPC psplit) Clause { clauseLHSRange = getRange i , clauseFullRange = getRange c , clauseTel = killRange delta , namedClausePats = ps , clauseBody = bodyMod body , clauseType = Just trhs , clauseCatchall = catchall' , clauseRecursive = Nothing -- we don't know yet , clauseUnreachable = Nothing -- we don't know yet , clauseEllipsis = lhsEllipsis i } -- | Type check the @with@ and @rewrite@ lhss and/or the rhs. checkRHS :: LHSInfo -- ^ Range of lhs. -> QName -- ^ Name of function. -> [NamedArg A.Pattern] -- ^ Patterns in lhs. -> Type -- ^ Top-level type of function. -> LHSResult -- ^ Result of type-checking patterns -> A.RHS -- ^ Rhs to check. -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) -- Note: the as-bindings are already bound (in checkClause) checkRHS i x aps t lhsResult@(LHSResult _ delta ps absurdPat trhs _ _asb _) rhs0 = handleRHS rhs0 where handleRHS :: A.RHS -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) handleRHS rhs = case rhs of A.RHS e _ -> ordinaryRHS e A.AbsurdRHS -> noRHS A.RewriteRHS eqs ps rhs wh -> rewriteEqnsRHS eqs ps rhs wh A.WithRHS aux es cs -> withRHS aux es cs -- Ordinary case: f xs = e ordinaryRHS :: A.Expr -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) ordinaryRHS e = Bench.billTo [Bench.Typing, Bench.CheckRHS] $ do -- If there is an absurd pattern, we do not need a RHS. If we have -- one we complain, ignore it and return the same @(Nothing, NoWithFunction)@ -- as the case dealing with @A.AbsurdRHS@. mv <- if absurdPat then Nothing <$ setCurrentRange e (warning $ AbsurdPatternRequiresNoRHS ps) else Just <$> checkExpr e (unArg trhs) return (mv, NoWithFunction) -- Absurd case: no right hand side noRHS :: TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) noRHS = do unless absurdPat $ typeError $ NoRHSRequiresAbsurdPattern aps return (Nothing, NoWithFunction) -- With case: @f xs with a | b | c | ...; ... | ps1 = rhs1; ... | ps2 = rhs2; ...@ -- This is mostly a wrapper around @checkWithRHS@ withRHS :: QName -- ^ name of the with-function -> [WithHiding A.Expr] -- ^ @[a, b, c, ...]@ -> [A.Clause] -- ^ @[(ps1 = rhs1), (ps2 = rhs), ...]@ -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) withRHS aux es cs = do reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 15 $ vcat [ "TC.Rules.Def.checkclause reached A.WithRHS" , sep $ prettyA aux : map (parens . prettyA) es ] reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 20 $ do nfv <- getCurrentModuleFreeVars m <- currentModule sep [ "with function module:" <+> prettyList (map prettyTCM $ mnameToList m) , text $ "free variables: " ++ show nfv ] -- Infer the types of the with expressions vtys <- mapM (traverse (fmap OtherType <.> inferExprForWith)) es -- Andreas, 2016-01-23, Issue #1796 -- Run the size constraint solver to improve with-abstraction -- in case the with-expression contains size metas. solveSizeConstraints DefaultToInfty checkWithRHS x aux t lhsResult vtys cs -- Rewrite case: f xs (rewrite / invert) a | b | c | ... rewriteEqnsRHS :: [A.RewriteEqn] -> [A.ProblemEq] -> A.RHS -> A.WhereDeclarations -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) rewriteEqnsRHS [] strippedPats rhs wh = checkWhere wh $ handleRHS rhs -- Case: @rewrite@ -- Andreas, 2014-01-17, Issue 1402: -- If the rewrites are discarded since lhs=rhs, then -- we can actually have where clauses. rewriteEqnsRHS (r:rs) strippedPats rhs wh = case r of Rewrite ((qname, eq) : qes) -> rewriteEqnRHS qname eq (case qes of { [] -> rs; _ -> Rewrite qes : rs }) Invert _ [] -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ Invert qname pes -> invertEqnRHS qname pes rs -- Invariant: these lists are non-empty Rewrite [] -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ where -- @invert@ clauses invertEqnRHS :: QName -> [(A.Pattern,A.Expr)] -> [A.RewriteEqn] -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) invertEqnRHS qname pes rs = do let (pats, es) = unzip pes -- Infer the types of the with expressions vtys <- mapM (WithHiding NotHidden <.> fmap OtherType <.> inferExprForWith) es -- Andreas, 2016-04-14, see also Issue #1796 -- Run the size constraint solver to improve with-abstraction -- in case the with-expression contains size metas. solveSizeConstraints DefaultToInfty let rhs' = insertPatterns pats rhs (rhs'', outerWhere) -- the where clauses should go on the inner-most with | null rs = (rhs', wh) | otherwise = (A.RewriteRHS rs strippedPats rhs' wh, A.noWhereDecls) -- Andreas, 2014-03-05 kill range of copied patterns -- since they really do not have a source location. cl = A.Clause (A.LHS i $ insertPatternsLHSCore pats $ A.LHSHead x $ killRange aps) strippedPats rhs'' outerWhere False reportSDoc "tc.invert" 60 $ vcat [ text "invert" , " rhs' = " <> (text . show) rhs' ] checkWithRHS x qname t lhsResult vtys [cl] -- @rewrite@ clauses rewriteEqnRHS :: QName -> A.Expr -> [A.RewriteEqn] -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) rewriteEqnRHS qname eq rs = do -- Action for skipping this rewrite. -- We do not want to create unsolved metas in case of -- a futile rewrite with a reflexive equation. -- Thus, we restore the state in this case, -- unless the rewrite expression contains questionmarks. st <- getTC let recurse = do st' <- getTC -- Comparing the whole stInteractionPoints maps is a bit -- wasteful, but we assume -- 1. rewriting with a reflexive equality to happen rarely, -- 2. especially with ?-holes in the rewrite expression -- 3. and a large overall number of ?s. let sameIP = (==) `on` (^.stInteractionPoints) when (sameIP st st') $ putTC st handleRHS $ A.RewriteRHS rs strippedPats rhs wh -- Get value and type of rewrite-expression. (proof, eqt) <- inferExpr eq -- Andreas, 2016-04-14, see also Issue #1796 -- Run the size constraint solver to improve with-abstraction -- in case the with-expression contains size metas. solveSizeConstraints DefaultToInfty -- Check that the type is actually an equality (lhs ≡ rhs) -- and extract lhs, rhs, and their type. t' <- reduce =<< instantiateFull eqt (eqt,rewriteType,rewriteFrom,rewriteTo) <- equalityView t' >>= \case eqt@(EqualityType _s _eq _params (Arg _ dom) a b) -> do s <- inferSort dom return (eqt, El s dom, unArg a, unArg b) -- Note: the sort _s of the equality need not be the sort of the type @dom@! OtherType{} -> typeError . GenericDocError =<< do "Cannot rewrite by equation of type" <+> prettyTCM t' -- Get the name of builtin REFL. Con reflCon _ [] <- primRefl reflInfo <- fmap (setOrigin Inserted) <$> getReflArgInfo reflCon -- Andreas, 2017-01-11: -- The test for refl is obsolete after fixes of #520 and #1740. -- -- Andreas, 2014-05-17 Issue 1110: -- -- Rewriting with @refl@ has no effect, but gives an -- -- incomprehensible error message about the generated -- -- with clause. Thus, we rather do simply nothing if -- -- rewriting with @refl@ is attempted. -- let isReflProof = do -- v <- reduce proof -- case v of -- Con c _ [] | c == reflCon -> return True -- _ -> return False -- ifM isReflProof recurse $ {- else -} do -- Process 'rewrite' clause like a suitable 'with' clause. -- The REFL constructor might have an argument let reflPat = A.ConP (ConPatInfo ConOCon patNoRange ConPatEager) (unambiguous $ conName reflCon) $ maybeToList $ fmap (\ ai -> Arg ai $ unnamed $ A.WildP patNoRange) reflInfo -- Andreas, 2015-12-25 Issue #1740: -- After the fix of #520, rewriting with a reflexive equation -- has to be desugared as matching against refl. let isReflexive = tryConversion $ dontAssignMetas $ equalTerm rewriteType rewriteFrom rewriteTo (pats, withExpr, withType) <- do ifM isReflexive {-then-} (return ([ reflPat ] , proof, OtherType t')) {-else-} (return ([ A.WildP patNoRange, reflPat ], proof, eqt)) let rhs' = insertPatterns pats rhs (rhs'', outerWhere) -- the where clauses should go on the inner-most with | null rs = (rhs', wh) | otherwise = (A.RewriteRHS rs strippedPats rhs' wh, A.noWhereDecls) -- Andreas, 2014-03-05 kill range of copied patterns -- since they really do not have a source location. cl = A.Clause (A.LHS i $ insertPatternsLHSCore pats $ A.LHSHead x $ killRange aps) strippedPats rhs'' outerWhere False reportSDoc "tc.rewrite" 60 $ vcat [ text "rewrite" , " rhs' = " <> (text . show) rhs' ] checkWithRHS x qname t lhsResult [WithHiding NotHidden (withExpr, withType)] [cl] checkWithRHS :: QName -- ^ Name of function. -> QName -- ^ Name of the with-function. -> Type -- ^ Type of function. -> LHSResult -- ^ Result of type-checking patterns -> [WithHiding (Term, EqualityView)] -- ^ Expressions and types of with-expressions. -> [A.Clause] -- ^ With-clauses to check. -> TCM (Maybe Term, WithFunctionProblem) -- Note: as-bindings already bound (in checkClause) checkWithRHS x aux t (LHSResult npars delta ps _absurdPat trhs _ _asb _) vtys0 cs = Bench.billTo [Bench.Typing, Bench.With] $ do let withArgs = withArguments vtys0 perm = fromMaybe __IMPOSSIBLE__ $ dbPatPerm ps vtys0 <- normalise vtys0 -- Andreas, 2012-09-17: for printing delta, -- we should remove it from the context first reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 25 $ escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ vcat [ "delta =" <+> prettyTCM delta ] reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 25 $ vcat $ -- declared locally because we do not want to use the unzip'd thing! let (vs, as) = unzipWith whThing vtys0 in [ "vs =" <+> prettyTCM vs , "as =" <+> prettyTCM as , "perm =" <+> text (show perm) ] -- Split the telescope into the part needed to type the with arguments -- and all the other stuff let (delta1, delta2, perm', t', vtys) = splitTelForWith delta (unArg trhs) vtys0 let finalPerm = composeP perm' perm reportSLn "tc.with.top" 75 $ "delta = " ++ show delta -- Andreas, 2012-09-17: for printing delta, -- we should remove it from the context first reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 25 $ escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ vcat [ "delta1 =" <+> prettyTCM delta1 , "delta2 =" <+> addContext delta1 (prettyTCM delta2) ] reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 25 $ vcat [ "perm' =" <+> text (show perm') , "fPerm =" <+> text (show finalPerm) ] -- Create the body of the original function -- All the context variables us <- getContextArgs let n = size us m = size delta -- First the variables bound outside this definition (us0, us1') = splitAt (n - m) us -- Then permute the rest and grab those needed to for the with arguments (us1, us2) = splitAt (size delta1) $ permute perm' us1' -- Now stuff the with arguments in between and finish with the remaining variables mkWithArg = \ (WithHiding h e) -> setHiding h $ defaultArg e v = Def aux $ map Apply $ us0 ++ us1 ++ map mkWithArg withArgs ++ us2 -- Andreas, 2013-02-26 add with-name to signature for printing purposes addConstant aux =<< do useTerPragma $ defaultDefn defaultArgInfo aux __DUMMY_TYPE__ emptyFunction -- Andreas, 2013-02-26 separate msgs to see which goes wrong reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 20 $ vcat $ let (vs, as) = unzipWith whThing vtys in [ " with arguments" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ addContext delta1 $ prettyList (map prettyTCM vs) , " types" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ addContext delta1 $ prettyList (map prettyTCM as) , "with function call" <+> prettyTCM v , " context" <+> (prettyTCM =<< getContextTelescope) , " delta" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ prettyTCM delta , " delta1" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ prettyTCM delta1 , " delta2" <+> do escapeContext __IMPOSSIBLE__ (size delta) $ addContext delta1 $ prettyTCM delta2 , " body" <+> prettyTCM v ] return (Just v, WithFunction x aux t delta delta1 delta2 vtys t' ps npars perm' perm finalPerm cs) -- | Invoked in empty context. checkWithFunction :: [Name] -> WithFunctionProblem -> TCM () checkWithFunction _ NoWithFunction = return () checkWithFunction cxtNames (WithFunction f aux t delta delta1 delta2 vtys b qs npars perm' perm finalPerm cs) = do let -- Δ₁ ws Δ₂ ⊢ withSub : Δ′ (where Δ′ is the context of the parent lhs) withSub :: Substitution withSub = let as = map (snd . whThing) vtys in liftS (size delta2) (wkS (countWithArgs as) idS) `composeS` renaming __IMPOSSIBLE__ (reverseP perm') reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 10 $ vcat [ "checkWithFunction" , nest 2 $ vcat $ let (vs, as) = unzipWith whThing vtys in [ "delta1 =" <+> prettyTCM delta1 , "delta2 =" <+> addContext delta1 (prettyTCM delta2) , "t =" <+> prettyTCM t , "as =" <+> addContext delta1 (prettyTCM as) , "vs =" <+> do addContext delta1 $ prettyTCM vs , "b =" <+> do addContext delta1 $ addContext delta2 $ prettyTCM b , "qs =" <+> do addContext delta $ prettyTCMPatternList qs , "perm' =" <+> text (show perm') , "perm =" <+> text (show perm) , "fperm =" <+> text (show finalPerm) , "withSub=" <+> text (show withSub) ] ] -- Add the type of the auxiliary function to the signature -- Generate the type of the with function delta1 <- normalise delta1 -- Issue 1332: checkInternal is picky about argInfo -- but module application is sloppy. -- We normalise to get rid of Def's coming -- from module applications. (withFunType, n) <- withFunctionType delta1 vtys delta2 b reportSDoc "tc.with.type" 10 $ sep [ "with-function type:", nest 2 $ prettyTCM withFunType ] reportSDoc "tc.with.type" 50 $ sep [ "with-function type:", nest 2 $ pretty withFunType ] -- Andreas, 2013-10-21 -- Check generated type directly in internal syntax. setCurrentRange cs $ traceCall NoHighlighting $ -- To avoid flicker. traceCall (CheckWithFunctionType withFunType) $ checkType withFunType -- With display forms are closed df <- inTopContext $ makeOpen =<< withDisplayForm f aux delta1 delta2 n qs perm' perm reportSLn "tc.with.top" 20 "created with display form" case dget df of Display n ts dt -> reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 20 $ "Display" <+> fsep [ text (show n) , prettyList $ map prettyTCM ts , prettyTCM dt ] addConstant aux =<< do useTerPragma $ (defaultDefn defaultArgInfo aux withFunType emptyFunction) { defDisplay = [df] } -- solveSizeConstraints -- Andreas, 2012-10-16 does not seem necessary reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 10 $ sep [ "added with function" <+> (prettyTCM aux) <+> "of type" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM withFunType , nest 2 $ "-|" <+> (prettyTCM =<< getContextTelescope) ] reportSDoc "tc.with.top" 70 $ vcat [ nest 2 $ text $ "raw with func. type = " ++ show withFunType ] -- Construct the body for the with function cs <- return $ map (A.lhsToSpine) cs cs <- buildWithFunction cxtNames f aux t delta qs npars withSub finalPerm (size delta1) n cs cs <- return $ map (A.spineToLhs) cs -- Check the with function checkFunDefS withFunType defaultArgInfo NotDelayed Nothing (Just f) info aux (Just withSub) cs where info = Info.mkDefInfo (nameConcrete $ qnameName aux) noFixity' PublicAccess ConcreteDef (getRange cs) -- | Type check a where clause. checkWhere :: A.WhereDeclarations -- ^ Where-declarations to check. -> TCM a -- ^ Continuation. -> TCM a checkWhere wh@(A.WhereDecls whmod ds) ret = do ensureNoNamedWhereInRefinedContext whmod loop ds where loop ds = case ds of [] -> ret [A.ScopedDecl scope ds] -> withScope_ scope $ loop ds [A.Section _ m tel ds] -> newSection m tel $ do localTC (\ e -> e { envCheckingWhere = True }) $ do checkDecls ds ret _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- #2897: We can't handle named where-modules in refined contexts. ensureNoNamedWhereInRefinedContext Nothing = return () ensureNoNamedWhereInRefinedContext (Just m) = traceCall (CheckNamedWhere m) $ do args <- map unArg <$> (moduleParamsToApply =<< currentModule) unless (isWeakening args) $ -- weakened contexts are fine genericDocError =<< do names <- map (argNameToString . fst . unDom) . telToList <$> (lookupSection =<< currentModule) let pr x v = text (x ++ " =") <+> prettyTCM v vcat [ fsep (pwords $ "Named where-modules are not allowed when module parameters have been refined by pattern matching. " ++ "See https://github.com/agda/agda/issues/2897.") , text $ "In this case the module parameter" ++ (if length args > 0 then "s have" else " has") ++ " been refined to" , nest 2 $ vcat (zipWith pr names args) ] where isWeakening [] = True isWeakening (Var i [] : args) = isWk (i - 1) args where isWk i [] = True isWk i (Var j [] : args) = i == j && isWk (i - 1) args isWk _ _ = False isWeakening _ = False -- | Enter a new section during type-checking. newSection :: ModuleName -> A.GeneralizeTelescope -> TCM a -> TCM a newSection m gtel@(A.GeneralizeTel _ tel) cont = do reportSDoc "tc.section" 10 $ "checking section" <+> prettyTCM m <+> fsep (map prettyA tel) checkGeneralizeTelescope gtel $ \ _ tel' -> do reportSDoc "tc.section" 10 $ "adding section:" <+> prettyTCM m <+> text (show (size tel')) addSection m reportSDoc "tc.section" 10 $ inTopContext $ nest 4 $ "actual tele:" <+> do prettyTCM =<< lookupSection m withCurrentModule m cont -- | Set the current clause number. atClause :: QName -> Int -> Type -> Maybe Substitution -> A.SpineClause -> TCM a -> TCM a atClause name i t sub cl ret = do clo <- buildClosure () localTC (\ e -> e { envClause = IPClause name i t sub cl clo [] }) ret