{-# LANGUAGE PatternGuards, KindSignatures #-} {-# LANGUAGE ExistentialQuantification, RankNTypes, ImpredicativeTypes #-} -- | This file is the CPS version of <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/CC-delcont-exc>'s Control.Monad.CC.CCExc, implementing the identical -- interface -- -- Monad transformer for multi-prompt delimited control -- It implements the superset of the interface described in -- -- * \"/A Monadic Framework for Delimited Continuations/\", -- R. Kent Dybvig, Simon Peyton Jones, and Amr Sabry -- JFP, v17, N6, pp. 687--730, 2007. -- <http://www.cs.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/techreports/TRNNN.cgi?trnum=TR615> -- -- The first main difference is the use of generalized prompts, which -- do not have to be created with new_prompt and therefore can be defined -- at top level. That removes one of the main practical drawbacks of -- Dybvig et al implementations: the necessity to carry around the prompts -- throughout all the code. -- -- The delimited continuation monad is parameterized by the flavor -- of generalized prompts. The end of this code defines several flavors; -- the library users may define their own. User-defined flavors are -- especially useful when user's code uses a small closed set of answer-types. -- Flavors PP and PD below are more general, assuming the set of possible -- answer-types is open and Typeable. If the user wishes to create several -- distinct prompts with the same answer-types, the user should use -- the flavor of prompts accepting an integral prompt identifier, such as PD. -- Prompts of the flavor PD correspond to the prompts in Dybvig, Peyton Jones, -- Sabry framework. If the user wishes to generate unique prompts, the user -- should arrange himself for the generation of unique integers -- (using a state monad, for example). On the other hand, the user -- can differentiate answer-types using `newtype.' The latter can -- only produce the set of distinct prompts that is fixed at run-time. -- Sometimes that is sufficient. There is not need to create a gensym -- monad then. -- -- See Control.Monad.CC.CCExc for further comments about the implementation module Control.Monad.CC.CCCxe ( -- * Types CC, SubCont, CCT, Prompt, -- * Basic delimited control operations pushPrompt, takeSubCont, pushSubCont, runCC, -- * Useful derived operations abortP, shiftP, shift0P, controlP, -- * Pre-defined prompt flavors PS, ps, P2, p2L, p2R, PP, pp, PM, pm, PD, newPrompt, as_prompt_type ) where import Control.Monad.Trans import Data.Typeable -- for prompts of the flavor PP, PD -- | Delimited-continuation monad transformer -- It is parameterized by the prompt flavor p -- The first argument is the regular (success) continuation, -- the second argument is the bubble, or a resumable exception newtype CC p m a = CC{unCC:: forall w. (a -> m w) -> (forall x. SubCont p m x a -> p m x -> m w) -> m w} -- | The captured sub-continuation type SubCont p m a b = CC p m a -> CC p m b -- | The type of control operator's body type CCT p m a w = SubCont p m a w -> CC p m w -- | Generalized prompts for the answer-type w: an injection-projection pair type Prompt p m w = (forall x. CCT p m x w -> p m x, forall x. p m x -> Maybe (CCT p m x w)) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | CC monad: general monadic operations instance Monad m => Monad (CC p m) where return x = CC $ \ki kd -> ki x m >>= f = CC $ \ki kd -> unCC m (\a -> unCC (f a) ki kd) (\ctx -> kd (\x -> ctx x >>= f)) instance MonadTrans (CC p) where lift m = CC $ \ki kd -> m >>= ki instance MonadIO m => MonadIO (CC p m) where liftIO = lift . liftIO -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Basic Operations of the delimited control interface pushPrompt :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> CC p m w -> CC p m w pushPrompt p@(_,proj) body = CC $ \ki kd -> let kd' ctx body | Just b <- proj body = unCC (b ctx) ki kd kd' ctx body = kd (\x -> pushPrompt p (ctx x)) body in unCC body ki kd' -- | Create the initial bubble takeSubCont :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> CCT p m x w -> CC p m x takeSubCont p@(inj,_) body = CC $ \ki kd -> kd id (inj body) -- | Apply the captured continuation pushSubCont :: Monad m => SubCont p m a b -> CC p m a -> CC p m b pushSubCont = ($) runCC :: Monad m => CC (p :: (* -> *) -> * -> *) m a -> m a runCC m = unCC m return err where err = error "Escaping bubble: you have forgotten pushPrompt" -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Useful derived operations abortP :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> CC p m w -> CC p m any abortP p e = takeSubCont p (\_ -> e) shiftP :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> ((a -> CC p m w) -> CC p m w) -> CC p m a shiftP p f = takeSubCont p $ \sk -> pushPrompt p (f (\c -> pushPrompt p (pushSubCont sk (return c)))) shift0P :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> ((a -> CC p m w) -> CC p m w) -> CC p m a shift0P p f = takeSubCont p $ \sk -> f (\c -> pushPrompt p (pushSubCont sk (return c))) controlP :: Monad m => Prompt p m w -> ((a -> CC p m w) -> CC p m w) -> CC p m a controlP p f = takeSubCont p $ \sk -> pushPrompt p (f (\c -> pushSubCont sk (return c))) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Prompt flavors -- | The extreme case: prompts for the single answer-type w. -- The monad (CC PS) then is the monad for regular (single-prompt) -- delimited continuations newtype PS w m x = PS (CCT (PS w) m x w) -- There is only one generalized prompt of the flavor PS for a -- given answer-type w. It is defined below ps :: Prompt (PS w) m w ps = (inj, prj) where inj = PS prj (PS x) = Just x -- | Prompts for the closed set of answer-types -- The following prompt flavor P2, for two answer-types w1 and w2, -- is given as an example. Typically, a programmer would define their -- own variant data type with variants for the answer-types that occur -- in their program. newtype P2 w1 w2 m x = P2 (Either (CCT (P2 w1 w2) m x w1) (CCT (P2 w1 w2) m x w2)) -- | There are two generalized prompts of the flavor P2" p2L :: Prompt (P2 w1 w2) m w1 p2L = (inj, prj) where inj = P2 . Left prj (P2 (Left x)) = Just x prj _ = Nothing p2R :: Prompt (P2 w1 w2) m w2 p2R = (inj, prj) where inj = P2 . Right prj (P2 (Right x)) = Just x prj _ = Nothing -- | Prompts for the open set of answer-types data PP m x = forall w. Typeable w => PP (CCT PP m x w) -- | We need to wrap the type alias CCT into a newtype. Otherwise, gcast -- doesn't work. We can't treat (CCT p m a w) as a an application of -- the `type constructor' (CCT p m a) to the type w: type aliases can't -- be partially applied. But we can treat the type (NCCT p m a w) that way. newtype NCCT p m a w = NCCT{unNCCT :: CCT p m a w} pp :: Typeable w => Prompt PP m w pp = (inj, prj) where inj = PP prj (PP c) = maybe Nothing (Just . unNCCT) (gcast (NCCT c)) -- | The same as PP but with the phantom parameter c -- The parameter is useful to statically enforce various constrains -- (statically pass some information between shift and reset) -- The prompt PP is too `dynamic': all errors are detected dynamically -- See Generator2.hs for an example data PM c m x = forall w. Typeable w => PM (CCT (PM c) m x w) pm :: Typeable w => Prompt (PM c) m w pm = (inj, prj) where inj = PM prj (PM c) = maybe Nothing (Just . unNCCT) (gcast (NCCT c)) -- | Open set of answer types, with an additional distinction (given by -- integer identifiers) -- This prompt flavor corresponds to the prompts in the Dybvig, Peyton-Jones, -- Sabry framework (modulo the Typeable constraint). data PD m x = forall w. Typeable w => PD Int (CCT PD m x w) newPrompt :: Typeable w => Int -> Prompt PD m w newPrompt mark = (inj, prj) where inj = PD mark prj (PD mark' c) | mark' == mark, Just (NCCT x) <- gcast (NCCT c) = Just x prj _ = Nothing -- | It is often helpful, for clarity of error messages, to specify the -- answer-type associated with the prompt explicitly (rather than relying -- on the type inference to figure that out). The following function -- is useful for that purpose. as_prompt_type :: Prompt p m w -> w -> Prompt p m w as_prompt_type = const