The bound package
We represent the target language itself as an ideal monad supplied by the user, and provide a Scope monad transformer for introducing bound variables in user supplied terms. Users supply a Monad and Traversable instance, and we traverse to find free variables, and use the Monad to perform substitution that avoids bound variables.
An untyped lambda calculus:
import Bound import Prelude.Extras
infixl 9 :@ data Exp a = V a | Exp a :@ Exp a | Lam (Scope () Exp a) deriving (Eq,Ord,Show,Read,Functor,Foldable,Traversable)
instance Eq1 Exp where (==#) = (==) instance Ord1 Exp where compare1 = compare instance Show1 Exp where showsPrec1 = showsPrec instance Read1 Exp where readsPrec1 = readsPrec instance Applicative Exp where pure = V; (<*>) = ap
instance Monad Exp where return = V V a >>= f = f a (x :@ y) >>= f = (x >>= f) :@ (y >>= f) Lam e >>= f = Lam (e >>>= f) lam :: Eq a => a -> Exp a -> Exp a lam v b = Lam (abstract1 v b)
whnf :: Exp a -> Exp a whnf (f :@ a) = case whnf f of Lam b -> whnf (instantiate1 a b) f' -> f' :@ a whnf e = e
The classes from Prelude.Extras are used to facilitate the automatic deriving of Eq, Ord, 'Show, and Read in the presence of polymorphic recursion used inside Scope.
The goal of this package is to make it as easy as possible to deal with name binding without forcing an awkward monadic style on the user.
With generalized de Bruijn term you can lift whole trees instead of just applying succ to individual variables, weakening the all variables bound by a scope. and by giving binders more structure we can permit easy simultaneous substitution.
The approach was first elaborated upon by Richard Bird and Ross Patterson in "de Bruijn notation as a nested data type", available from http://www.cs.uwyo.edu/~jlc/courses/5000_fall_08/debruijn_as_nested_datatype.pdf
However, the combinators they used required higher rank types. Here we demonstrate that the higher rank gfold combinator they used isn't necessary to build the monad and use a monad transformer to encapsulate the novel recursion pattern in their generalized de Bruijn representation. It is named Scope to match up with the terminology and usage pattern from Conor McBride and James McKinna's "I am not a number: I am a free variable", available from http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~james/RESEARCH/notanum.pdf, but since the set of variables is visible in the type, we can provide stronger type safety guarantees.
There are longer examples in the examples/ folder:
Simple.hs provides an untyped lambda calculus with recursive let bindings. and includes an evaluator for the untyped lambda calculus and a longer example taken from Lennart Augustsson's λ-calculus cooked four ways available from http://www.augustsson.net/Darcs/Lambda/top.pdf
2. Derived.hs shows how much of the API can be automated with DeriveTraversable and adds combinators for building binders that support pattern matching.
3. Overkill.hs provides very strongly typed pattern matching many modern type extensions, including polymorphic kinds to ensure type safety. In general, the approach taken by Derived seems to deliver a better power to weight ratio.
- No changelog available
|Versions||0.1, 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3, 0.1.4, 0.2, 0.2.1, 0.3.1, 0.3.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5.0.1, 0.5.0.2, 0.5.1, 0.6, 0.6.1, 0.7, 0.8, 0.8.1, 0.9, 0.9.0.1, 0.9.1, 0.9.1.1, 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2|
|Dependencies||base (==4.*), bifunctors (>=0.1.3 && <0.2), prelude-extras (==0.2.*), transformers (>=0.2 && <0.4)|
|Copyright||Copyright (C) 2012 Edward A. Kmett|
|Author||Edward A. Kmett|
|Maintainer||Edward A. Kmett <email@example.com>|
|Source repository||head: git clone git://github.com/ekmett/bound.git|
|Upload date||Sun Jun 17 00:03:52 UTC 2012|
|Downloads||2070 total (745 in last 30 days)|
For package maintainers and hackage trustees