{- Author: George Karachalias Pattern Matching Coverage Checking. -} {-# LANGUAGE CPP, GADTs, DataKinds, KindSignatures #-} {-# LANGUAGE TupleSections #-} module Language.Haskell.Liquid.Desugar.Check ( -- Checking and printing checkSingle, checkMatches, isAnyPmCheckEnabled, -- See Note [Type and Term Equality Propagation] genCaseTmCs1, genCaseTmCs2 ) where import Language.Haskell.Liquid.Desugar.TmOracle import DynFlags import HsSyn import TcHsSyn import Id import ConLike import Name import FamInstEnv import TysWiredIn import TyCon import SrcLoc import Util import Outputable import FastString import DataCon import HscTypes (CompleteMatch(..)) import Language.Haskell.Liquid.Desugar.DsMonad import TcSimplify (tcCheckSatisfiability) import TcType (toTcType, isStringTy, isIntTy, isWordTy) import Bag import ErrUtils import Var (EvVar) import Type import UniqSupply import Language.Haskell.Liquid.Desugar.DsGRHSs (isTrueLHsExpr) import Data.List (find) import Data.Maybe (isJust, fromMaybe) import Control.Monad (forM, when, forM_) import Coercion import TcEvidence import IOEnv import ListT (ListT(..), fold, select) {- This module checks pattern matches for: \begin{enumerate} \item Equations that are redundant \item Equations with inaccessible right-hand-side \item Exhaustiveness \end{enumerate} The algorithm is based on the paper: "GADTs Meet Their Match: Pattern-matching Warnings That Account for GADTs, Guards, and Laziness" http://people.cs.kuleuven.be/~george.karachalias/papers/p424-karachalias.pdf %************************************************************************ %* * Pattern Match Check Types %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- We use the non-determinism monad to apply the algorithm to several -- possible sets of constructors. Users can specify complete sets of -- constructors by using COMPLETE pragmas. -- The algorithm only picks out constructor -- sets deep in the bowels which makes a simpler `mapM` more difficult to -- implement. The non-determinism is only used in one place, see the ConVar -- case in `pmCheckHd`. type PmM a = ListT DsM a liftD :: DsM a -> PmM a liftD m = ListT $ \sk fk -> m >>= \a -> sk a fk -- Pick the first match complete covered match or otherwise the "best" match. -- The best match is the one with the least uncovered clauses, ties broken -- by the number of inaccessible clauses followed by number of redudant -- clauses getResult :: PmM PmResult -> DsM PmResult getResult ls = do res <- fold ls goM (pure Nothing) case res of Nothing -> panic "getResult is empty" Just a -> return a where goM :: PmResult -> DsM (Maybe PmResult) -> DsM (Maybe PmResult) goM mpm dpm = do pmr <- dpm return $ go pmr mpm -- Careful not to force unecessary results go :: Maybe PmResult -> PmResult -> Maybe PmResult go Nothing rs = Just rs go old@(Just (PmResult prov rs (UncoveredPatterns us) is)) new | null us && null rs && null is = old | otherwise = let PmResult prov' rs' (UncoveredPatterns us') is' = new lr = length rs lr' = length rs' li = length is li' = length is' in case compare (length us) (length us') `mappend` (compare li li') `mappend` (compare lr lr') `mappend` (compare prov prov') of GT -> Just new EQ -> Just new LT -> old go (Just (PmResult _ _ (TypeOfUncovered _) _)) _new = panic "getResult: No inhabitation candidates" data PatTy = PAT | VA -- Used only as a kind, to index PmPat -- The *arity* of a PatVec [p1,..,pn] is -- the number of p1..pn that are not Guards data PmPat :: PatTy -> * where PmCon :: { pm_con_con :: ConLike , pm_con_arg_tys :: [Type] , pm_con_tvs :: [TyVar] , pm_con_dicts :: [EvVar] , pm_con_args :: [PmPat t] } -> PmPat t -- For PmCon arguments' meaning see @ConPatOut@ in hsSyn/HsPat.hs PmVar :: { pm_var_id :: Id } -> PmPat t PmLit :: { pm_lit_lit :: PmLit } -> PmPat t -- See Note [Literals in PmPat] PmNLit :: { pm_lit_id :: Id , pm_lit_not :: [PmLit] } -> PmPat 'VA PmGrd :: { pm_grd_pv :: PatVec , pm_grd_expr :: PmExpr } -> PmPat 'PAT -- data T a where -- MkT :: forall p q. (Eq p, Ord q) => p -> q -> T [p] -- or MkT :: forall p q r. (Eq p, Ord q, [p] ~ r) => p -> q -> T r type Pattern = PmPat 'PAT -- ^ Patterns type ValAbs = PmPat 'VA -- ^ Value Abstractions type PatVec = [Pattern] -- ^ Pattern Vectors data ValVec = ValVec [ValAbs] Delta -- ^ Value Vector Abstractions -- | Term and type constraints to accompany each value vector abstraction. -- For efficiency, we store the term oracle state instead of the term -- constraints. TODO: Do the same for the type constraints? data Delta = MkDelta { delta_ty_cs :: Bag EvVar , delta_tm_cs :: TmState } type ValSetAbs = [ValVec] -- ^ Value Set Abstractions type Uncovered = ValSetAbs -- Instead of keeping the whole sets in memory, we keep a boolean for both the -- covered and the divergent set (we store the uncovered set though, since we -- want to print it). For both the covered and the divergent we have: -- -- True <=> The set is non-empty -- -- hence: -- C = True ==> Useful clause (no warning) -- C = False, D = True ==> Clause with inaccessible RHS -- C = False, D = False ==> Redundant clause data Covered = Covered | NotCovered deriving Show instance Outputable Covered where ppr (Covered) = text "Covered" ppr (NotCovered) = text "NotCovered" -- Like the or monoid for booleans -- Covered = True, Uncovered = False instance Monoid Covered where mempty = NotCovered Covered `mappend` _ = Covered _ `mappend` Covered = Covered NotCovered `mappend` NotCovered = NotCovered data Diverged = Diverged | NotDiverged deriving Show instance Outputable Diverged where ppr Diverged = text "Diverged" ppr NotDiverged = text "NotDiverged" instance Monoid Diverged where mempty = NotDiverged Diverged `mappend` _ = Diverged _ `mappend` Diverged = Diverged NotDiverged `mappend` NotDiverged = NotDiverged -- | When we learned that a given match group is complete data Provenance = FromBuiltin -- ^ From the original definition of the type -- constructor. | FromComplete -- ^ From a user-provided @COMPLETE@ pragma deriving (Show, Eq, Ord) instance Outputable Provenance where ppr = text . show instance Monoid Provenance where mempty = FromBuiltin FromComplete `mappend` _ = FromComplete _ `mappend` FromComplete = FromComplete _ `mappend` _ = FromBuiltin data PartialResult = PartialResult { presultProvenence :: Provenance -- keep track of provenance because we don't want -- to warn about redundant matches if the result -- is contaiminated with a COMPLETE pragma , presultCovered :: Covered , presultUncovered :: Uncovered , presultDivergent :: Diverged } instance Outputable PartialResult where ppr (PartialResult prov c vsa d) = text "PartialResult" <+> ppr prov <+> ppr c <+> ppr d <+> ppr vsa instance Monoid PartialResult where mempty = PartialResult mempty mempty [] mempty (PartialResult prov1 cs1 vsa1 ds1) `mappend` (PartialResult prov2 cs2 vsa2 ds2) = PartialResult (prov1 `mappend` prov2) (cs1 `mappend` cs2) (vsa1 `mappend` vsa2) (ds1 `mappend` ds2) -- newtype ChoiceOf a = ChoiceOf [a] -- | Pattern check result -- -- * Redundant clauses -- * Not-covered clauses (or their type, if no pattern is available) -- * Clauses with inaccessible RHS -- -- More details about the classification of clauses into useful, redundant -- and with inaccessible right hand side can be found here: -- -- https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/PatternMatchCheck -- data PmResult = PmResult { pmresultProvenance :: Provenance , pmresultRedundant :: [Located [LPat Id]] , pmresultUncovered :: UncoveredCandidates , pmresultInaccessible :: [Located [LPat Id]] } -- | Either a list of patterns that are not covered, or their type, in case we -- have no patterns at hand. Not having patterns at hand can arise when -- handling EmptyCase expressions, in two cases: -- -- * The type of the scrutinee is a trivially inhabited type (like Int or Char) -- * The type of the scrutinee cannot be reduced to WHNF. -- -- In both these cases we have no inhabitation candidates for the type at hand, -- but we don't want to issue just a wildcard as missing. Instead, we print a -- type annotated wildcard, so that the user knows what kind of patterns is -- expected (e.g. (_ :: Int), or (_ :: F Int), where F Int does not reduce). data UncoveredCandidates = UncoveredPatterns Uncovered | TypeOfUncovered Type -- | The empty pattern check result emptyPmResult :: PmResult emptyPmResult = PmResult FromBuiltin [] (UncoveredPatterns []) [] -- | Non-exhaustive empty case with unknown/trivial inhabitants uncoveredWithTy :: Type -> PmResult uncoveredWithTy ty = PmResult FromBuiltin [] (TypeOfUncovered ty) [] {- %************************************************************************ %* * Entry points to the checker: checkSingle and checkMatches %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- | Check a single pattern binding (let) checkSingle :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> Id -> Pat Id -> DsM () checkSingle dflags ctxt@(DsMatchContext _ locn) var p = do tracePmD "checkSingle" (vcat [ppr ctxt, ppr var, ppr p]) mb_pm_res <- tryM (getResult (checkSingle' locn var p)) case mb_pm_res of Left _ -> warnPmIters dflags ctxt Right res -> dsPmWarn dflags ctxt res -- | Check a single pattern binding (let) checkSingle' :: SrcSpan -> Id -> Pat Id -> PmM PmResult checkSingle' locn var p = do liftD resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs clause <- liftD $ translatePat fam_insts p missing <- mkInitialUncovered [var] tracePm "checkSingle: missing" (vcat (map pprValVecDebug missing)) -- no guards PartialResult prov cs us ds <- runMany (pmcheckI clause []) missing let us' = UncoveredPatterns us return $ case (cs,ds) of (Covered, _ ) -> PmResult prov [] us' [] -- useful (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> PmResult prov m us' [] -- redundant (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> PmResult prov [] us' m -- inaccessible rhs where m = [L locn [L locn p]] -- | Check a matchgroup (case, functions, etc.) checkMatches :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> [Id] -> [LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id)] -> DsM () checkMatches dflags ctxt vars matches = do tracePmD "checkMatches" (hang (vcat [ppr ctxt , ppr vars , text "Matches:"]) 2 (vcat (map ppr matches))) mb_pm_res <- tryM $ getResult $ case matches of -- Check EmptyCase separately -- See Note [Checking EmptyCase Expressions] [] | [var] <- vars -> checkEmptyCase' var _normal_match -> checkMatches' vars matches case mb_pm_res of Left _ -> warnPmIters dflags ctxt Right res -> dsPmWarn dflags ctxt res -- | Check a matchgroup (case, functions, etc.). To be called on a non-empty -- list of matches. For empty case expressions, use checkEmptyCase' instead. checkMatches' :: [Id] -> [LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id)] -> PmM PmResult checkMatches' vars matches | null matches = panic "checkMatches': EmptyCase" | otherwise = do liftD resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero missing <- mkInitialUncovered vars tracePm "checkMatches: missing" (vcat (map pprValVecDebug missing)) (prov, rs,us,ds) <- go matches missing return $ PmResult { pmresultProvenance = prov , pmresultRedundant = map hsLMatchToLPats rs , pmresultUncovered = UncoveredPatterns us , pmresultInaccessible = map hsLMatchToLPats ds } where go :: [LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id)] -> Uncovered -> PmM (Provenance , [LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id)] , Uncovered , [LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id)]) go [] missing = return (mempty, [], missing, []) go (m:ms) missing = do tracePm "checMatches': go" (ppr m $$ ppr missing) fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs (clause, guards) <- liftD $ translateMatch fam_insts m r@(PartialResult prov cs missing' ds) <- runMany (pmcheckI clause guards) missing tracePm "checMatches': go: res" (ppr r) (ms_prov, rs, final_u, is) <- go ms missing' let final_prov = prov `mappend` ms_prov return $ case (cs, ds) of -- useful (Covered, _ ) -> (final_prov, rs, final_u, is) -- redundant (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> (final_prov, m:rs, final_u,is) -- inaccessible (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> (final_prov, rs, final_u, m:is) hsLMatchToLPats :: LMatch id body -> Located [LPat id] hsLMatchToLPats (L l (Match _ pats _ _)) = L l pats -- | Check an empty case expression. Since there are no clauses to process, we -- only compute the uncovered set. See Note [Checking EmptyCase Expressions] -- for details. checkEmptyCase' :: Id -> PmM PmResult checkEmptyCase' var = do tm_css <- map toComplex . bagToList <$> liftD getTmCsDs case tmOracle initialTmState tm_css of Just tm_state -> do ty_css <- liftD getDictsDs fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs mb_candidates <- inhabitationCandidates fam_insts (idType var) case mb_candidates of -- Inhabitation checking failed / the type is trivially inhabited Left ty -> return (uncoveredWithTy ty) -- A list of inhabitant candidates is available: Check for each -- one for the satisfiability of the constraints it gives rise to. Right candidates -> do missing_m <- flip concatMapM candidates $ \(va,tm_ct,ty_cs) -> do let all_ty_cs = unionBags ty_cs ty_css sat_ty <- tyOracle all_ty_cs return $ case (sat_ty, tmOracle tm_state (tm_ct:tm_css)) of (True, Just tm_state') -> [(va, all_ty_cs, tm_state')] _non_sat -> [] let mkValVec (va,all_ty_cs,tm_state') = ValVec [va] (MkDelta all_ty_cs tm_state') uncovered = UncoveredPatterns (map mkValVec missing_m) return $ if null missing_m then emptyPmResult else PmResult FromBuiltin [] uncovered [] Nothing -> return emptyPmResult -- | Generate all inhabitation candidates for a given type. The result is -- either (Left ty), if the type cannot be reduced to a closed algebraic type -- (or if it's one trivially inhabited, like Int), or (Right candidates), if it -- can. In this case, the candidates are the singnature of the tycon, each one -- accompanied by the term- and type- constraints it gives rise to. -- See also Note [Checking EmptyCase Expressions] inhabitationCandidates :: FamInstEnvs -> Type -> PmM (Either Type [(ValAbs, ComplexEq, Bag EvVar)]) inhabitationCandidates fam_insts ty = case pmTopNormaliseType_maybe fam_insts ty of Just (src_ty, dcs, core_ty) -> alts_to_check src_ty core_ty dcs Nothing -> alts_to_check ty ty [] where -- All these types are trivially inhabited trivially_inhabited = [ charTyCon, doubleTyCon, floatTyCon , intTyCon, wordTyCon, word8TyCon ] -- Note: At the moment we leave all the typing and constraint fields of -- PmCon empty, since we know that they are not gonna be used. Is the -- right-thing-to-do to actually create them, even if they are never used? build_tm :: ValAbs -> [DataCon] -> ValAbs build_tm = foldr (\dc e -> PmCon (RealDataCon dc) [] [] [] [e]) -- Inhabitation candidates, using the result of pmTopNormaliseType_maybe alts_to_check :: Type -> Type -> [DataCon] -> PmM (Either Type [(ValAbs, ComplexEq, Bag EvVar)]) alts_to_check src_ty core_ty dcs = case splitTyConApp_maybe core_ty of Just (tc, _) | tc `elem` trivially_inhabited -> case dcs of [] -> return (Left src_ty) (_:_) -> do var <- liftD $ mkPmId (toTcType core_ty) let va = build_tm (PmVar var) dcs return $ Right [(va, mkIdEq var, emptyBag)] | isClosedAlgType core_ty -> liftD $ do var <- mkPmId (toTcType core_ty) -- it would be wrong to unify x alts <- mapM (mkOneConFull var . RealDataCon) (tyConDataCons tc) return $ Right [(build_tm va dcs, eq, cs) | (va, eq, cs) <- alts] -- For other types conservatively assume that they are inhabited. _other -> return (Left src_ty) {- Note [Checking EmptyCase Expressions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Empty case expressions are strict on the scrutinee. That is, `case x of {}` will force argument `x`. Hence, `checkMatches` is not sufficient for checking empty cases, because it assumes that the match is not strict (which is true for all other cases, apart from EmptyCase). This gave rise to #10746. Instead, we do the following: 1. We normalise the outermost type family redex, data family redex or newtype, using pmTopNormaliseType_maybe (in types/FamInstEnv.hs). This computes 3 things: (a) A normalised type src_ty, which is equal to the type of the scrutinee in source Haskell (does not normalise newtypes or data families) (b) The actual normalised type core_ty, which coincides with the result topNormaliseType_maybe. This type is not necessarily equal to the input type in source Haskell. And this is precicely the reason we compute (a) and (c): the reasoning happens with the underlying types, but both the patterns and types we print should respect newtypes and also show the family type constructors and not the representation constructors. (c) A list of all newtype data constructors dcs, each one corresponding to a newtype rewrite performed in (b). For an example see also Note [Type normalisation for EmptyCase] in types/FamInstEnv.hs. 2. Function checkEmptyCase' performs the check: - If core_ty is not an algebraic type, then we cannot check for inhabitation, so we emit (_ :: src_ty) as missing, conservatively assuming that the type is inhabited. - If core_ty is an algebraic type, then we unfold the scrutinee to all possible constructor patterns, using inhabitationCandidates, and then check each one for constraint satisfiability, same as we for normal pattern match checking. %************************************************************************ %* * Transform source syntax to *our* syntax %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Utilities nullaryConPattern :: ConLike -> Pattern -- Nullary data constructor and nullary type constructor nullaryConPattern con = PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = [] , pm_con_tvs = [], pm_con_dicts = [], pm_con_args = [] } {-# INLINE nullaryConPattern #-} truePattern :: Pattern truePattern = nullaryConPattern (RealDataCon trueDataCon) {-# INLINE truePattern #-} -- | A fake guard pattern (True <- _) used to represent cases we cannot handle fake_pat :: Pattern fake_pat = PmGrd { pm_grd_pv = [truePattern] , pm_grd_expr = PmExprOther EWildPat } {-# INLINE fake_pat #-} -- | Check whether a guard pattern is generated by the checker (unhandled) isFakeGuard :: [Pattern] -> PmExpr -> Bool isFakeGuard [PmCon { pm_con_con = RealDataCon c }] (PmExprOther EWildPat) | c == trueDataCon = True | otherwise = False isFakeGuard _pats _e = False -- | Generate a `canFail` pattern vector of a specific type mkCanFailPmPat :: Type -> DsM PatVec mkCanFailPmPat ty = do var <- mkPmVar ty return [var, fake_pat] vanillaConPattern :: ConLike -> [Type] -> PatVec -> Pattern -- ADT constructor pattern => no existentials, no local constraints vanillaConPattern con arg_tys args = PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = arg_tys , pm_con_tvs = [], pm_con_dicts = [], pm_con_args = args } {-# INLINE vanillaConPattern #-} -- | Create an empty list pattern of a given type nilPattern :: Type -> Pattern nilPattern ty = PmCon { pm_con_con = RealDataCon nilDataCon, pm_con_arg_tys = [ty] , pm_con_tvs = [], pm_con_dicts = [] , pm_con_args = [] } {-# INLINE nilPattern #-} mkListPatVec :: Type -> PatVec -> PatVec -> PatVec mkListPatVec ty xs ys = [PmCon { pm_con_con = RealDataCon consDataCon , pm_con_arg_tys = [ty] , pm_con_tvs = [], pm_con_dicts = [] , pm_con_args = xs++ys }] {-# INLINE mkListPatVec #-} -- | Create a (non-overloaded) literal pattern mkLitPattern :: HsLit -> Pattern mkLitPattern lit = PmLit { pm_lit_lit = PmSLit lit } {-# INLINE mkLitPattern #-} -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Transform (Pat Id) into of (PmPat Id) translatePat :: FamInstEnvs -> Pat Id -> DsM PatVec translatePat fam_insts pat = case pat of WildPat ty -> mkPmVars [ty] VarPat id -> return [PmVar (unLoc id)] ParPat p -> translatePat fam_insts (unLoc p) LazyPat _ -> mkPmVars [hsPatType pat] -- like a variable -- ignore strictness annotations for now BangPat p -> translatePat fam_insts (unLoc p) AsPat lid p -> do -- Note [Translating As Patterns] ps <- translatePat fam_insts (unLoc p) let [e] = map vaToPmExpr (coercePatVec ps) g = PmGrd [PmVar (unLoc lid)] e return (ps ++ [g]) SigPatOut p _ty -> translatePat fam_insts (unLoc p) -- See Note [Translate CoPats] CoPat wrapper p ty | isIdHsWrapper wrapper -> translatePat fam_insts p | WpCast co <- wrapper, isReflexiveCo co -> translatePat fam_insts p | otherwise -> do ps <- translatePat fam_insts p (xp,xe) <- mkPmId2Forms ty let g = mkGuard ps (HsWrap wrapper (unLoc xe)) return [xp,g] -- (n + k) ===> x (True <- x >= k) (n <- x-k) NPlusKPat (L _ _n) _k1 _k2 _ge _minus ty -> mkCanFailPmPat ty -- (fun -> pat) ===> x (pat <- fun x) ViewPat lexpr lpat arg_ty -> do ps <- translatePat fam_insts (unLoc lpat) -- See Note [Guards and Approximation] case all cantFailPattern ps of True -> do (xp,xe) <- mkPmId2Forms arg_ty let g = mkGuard ps (HsApp lexpr xe) return [xp,g] False -> mkCanFailPmPat arg_ty -- list ListPat ps ty Nothing -> do foldr (mkListPatVec ty) [nilPattern ty] <$> translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc ps) -- overloaded list ListPat lpats elem_ty (Just (pat_ty, _to_list)) | Just e_ty <- splitListTyConApp_maybe pat_ty , (_, norm_elem_ty) <- normaliseType fam_insts Nominal elem_ty -- elem_ty is frequently something like -- `Item [Int]`, but we prefer `Int` , norm_elem_ty `eqType` e_ty -> -- We have to ensure that the element types are exactly the same. -- Otherwise, one may give an instance IsList [Int] (more specific than -- the default IsList [a]) with a different implementation for `toList' translatePat fam_insts (ListPat lpats e_ty Nothing) -- See Note [Guards and Approximation] | otherwise -> mkCanFailPmPat pat_ty ConPatOut { pat_con = L _ con , pat_arg_tys = arg_tys , pat_tvs = ex_tvs , pat_dicts = dicts , pat_args = ps } -> do groups <- allCompleteMatches con arg_tys case groups of [] -> mkCanFailPmPat (conLikeResTy con arg_tys) _ -> do args <- translateConPatVec fam_insts arg_tys ex_tvs con ps return [PmCon { pm_con_con = con , pm_con_arg_tys = arg_tys , pm_con_tvs = ex_tvs , pm_con_dicts = dicts , pm_con_args = args }] NPat (L _ ol) mb_neg _eq ty -> translateNPat fam_insts ol mb_neg ty LitPat lit -- If it is a string then convert it to a list of characters | HsString src s <- lit -> foldr (mkListPatVec charTy) [nilPattern charTy] <$> translatePatVec fam_insts (map (LitPat . HsChar src) (unpackFS s)) | otherwise -> return [mkLitPattern lit] PArrPat ps ty -> do tidy_ps <- translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc ps) let fake_con = RealDataCon (parrFakeCon (length ps)) return [vanillaConPattern fake_con [ty] (concat tidy_ps)] TuplePat ps boxity tys -> do tidy_ps <- translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc ps) let tuple_con = RealDataCon (tupleDataCon boxity (length ps)) return [vanillaConPattern tuple_con tys (concat tidy_ps)] SumPat p alt arity ty -> do tidy_p <- translatePat fam_insts (unLoc p) let sum_con = RealDataCon (sumDataCon alt arity) return [vanillaConPattern sum_con ty tidy_p] -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Not supposed to happen ConPatIn {} -> panic "Check.translatePat: ConPatIn" SplicePat {} -> panic "Check.translatePat: SplicePat" SigPatIn {} -> panic "Check.translatePat: SigPatIn" -- | Translate an overloaded literal (see `tidyNPat' in deSugar/MatchLit.hs) translateNPat :: FamInstEnvs -> HsOverLit Id -> Maybe (SyntaxExpr Id) -> Type -> DsM PatVec translateNPat fam_insts (OverLit val False _ ty) mb_neg outer_ty | not type_change, isStringTy ty, HsIsString src s <- val, Nothing <- mb_neg = translatePat fam_insts (LitPat (HsString src s)) | not type_change, isIntTy ty, HsIntegral src i <- val = translatePat fam_insts (mk_num_lit HsInt src i) | not type_change, isWordTy ty, HsIntegral src i <- val = translatePat fam_insts (mk_num_lit HsWordPrim src i) where type_change = not (outer_ty `eqType` ty) mk_num_lit c src i = LitPat $ case mb_neg of Nothing -> c src i Just _ -> c src (-i) translateNPat _ ol mb_neg _ = return [PmLit { pm_lit_lit = PmOLit (isJust mb_neg) ol }] -- | Translate a list of patterns (Note: each pattern is translated -- to a pattern vector but we do not concatenate the results). translatePatVec :: FamInstEnvs -> [Pat Id] -> DsM [PatVec] translatePatVec fam_insts pats = mapM (translatePat fam_insts) pats -- | Translate a constructor pattern translateConPatVec :: FamInstEnvs -> [Type] -> [TyVar] -> ConLike -> HsConPatDetails Id -> DsM PatVec translateConPatVec fam_insts _univ_tys _ex_tvs _ (PrefixCon ps) = concat <$> translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc ps) translateConPatVec fam_insts _univ_tys _ex_tvs _ (InfixCon p1 p2) = concat <$> translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc [p1,p2]) translateConPatVec fam_insts univ_tys ex_tvs c (RecCon (HsRecFields fs _)) -- Nothing matched. Make up some fresh term variables | null fs = mkPmVars arg_tys -- The data constructor was not defined using record syntax. For the -- pattern to be in record syntax it should be empty (e.g. Just {}). -- So just like the previous case. | null orig_lbls = mkPmVars arg_tys -- Some of the fields appear, in the original order (there may be holes). -- Generate a simple constructor pattern and make up fresh variables for -- the rest of the fields | matched_lbls `subsetOf` orig_lbls = let translateOne (lbl, ty) = case lookup lbl matched_pats of Just p -> translatePat fam_insts p Nothing -> mkPmVars [ty] in concatMapM translateOne (zip orig_lbls arg_tys) -- The fields that appear are not in the correct order. Make up fresh -- variables for all fields and add guards after matching, to force the -- evaluation in the correct order. | otherwise = do arg_var_pats <- mkPmVars arg_tys translated_pats <- forM matched_pats $ \(x,pat) -> do pvec <- translatePat fam_insts pat return (x, pvec) let zipped = zip orig_lbls [ x | PmVar x <- arg_var_pats ] guards = map (\(name,pvec) -> case lookup name zipped of Just x -> PmGrd pvec (PmExprVar (idName x)) Nothing -> panic "translateConPatVec: lookup") translated_pats return (arg_var_pats ++ guards) where -- The actual argument types (instantiated) arg_tys = conLikeInstOrigArgTys c (univ_tys ++ mkTyVarTys ex_tvs) -- Some label information orig_lbls = map flSelector $ conLikeFieldLabels c matched_pats = [ (getName (unLoc (hsRecFieldId x)), unLoc (hsRecFieldArg x)) | L _ x <- fs] matched_lbls = [ name | (name, _pat) <- matched_pats ] subsetOf :: Eq a => [a] -> [a] -> Bool subsetOf [] _ = True subsetOf (_:_) [] = False subsetOf (x:xs) (y:ys) | x == y = subsetOf xs ys | otherwise = subsetOf (x:xs) ys -- Translate a single match translateMatch :: FamInstEnvs -> LMatch Id (LHsExpr Id) -> DsM (PatVec,[PatVec]) translateMatch fam_insts (L _ (Match _ lpats _ grhss)) = do pats' <- concat <$> translatePatVec fam_insts pats guards' <- mapM (translateGuards fam_insts) guards return (pats', guards') where extractGuards :: LGRHS Id (LHsExpr Id) -> [GuardStmt Id] extractGuards (L _ (GRHS gs _)) = map unLoc gs pats = map unLoc lpats guards = map extractGuards (grhssGRHSs grhss) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Transform source guards (GuardStmt Id) to PmPats (Pattern) -- | Translate a list of guard statements to a pattern vector translateGuards :: FamInstEnvs -> [GuardStmt Id] -> DsM PatVec translateGuards fam_insts guards = do all_guards <- concat <$> mapM (translateGuard fam_insts) guards return (replace_unhandled all_guards) -- It should have been (return all_guards) but it is too expressive. -- Since the term oracle does not handle all constraints we generate, -- we (hackily) replace all constraints the oracle cannot handle with a -- single one (we need to know if there is a possibility of falure). -- See Note [Guards and Approximation] for all guard-related approximations -- we implement. where replace_unhandled :: PatVec -> PatVec replace_unhandled gv | any_unhandled gv = fake_pat : [ p | p <- gv, shouldKeep p ] | otherwise = gv any_unhandled :: PatVec -> Bool any_unhandled gv = any (not . shouldKeep) gv shouldKeep :: Pattern -> Bool shouldKeep p | PmVar {} <- p = True | PmCon {} <- p = singleConstructor (pm_con_con p) && all shouldKeep (pm_con_args p) shouldKeep (PmGrd pv e) | all shouldKeep pv = True | isNotPmExprOther e = True -- expensive but we want it shouldKeep _other_pat = False -- let the rest.. -- | Check whether a pattern can fail to match cantFailPattern :: Pattern -> Bool cantFailPattern p | PmVar {} <- p = True | PmCon {} <- p = singleConstructor (pm_con_con p) && all cantFailPattern (pm_con_args p) cantFailPattern (PmGrd pv _e) = all cantFailPattern pv cantFailPattern _ = False -- | Translate a guard statement to Pattern translateGuard :: FamInstEnvs -> GuardStmt Id -> DsM PatVec translateGuard fam_insts guard = case guard of BodyStmt e _ _ _ -> translateBoolGuard e LetStmt binds -> translateLet (unLoc binds) BindStmt p e _ _ _ -> translateBind fam_insts p e LastStmt {} -> panic "translateGuard LastStmt" ParStmt {} -> panic "translateGuard ParStmt" TransStmt {} -> panic "translateGuard TransStmt" RecStmt {} -> panic "translateGuard RecStmt" ApplicativeStmt {} -> panic "translateGuard ApplicativeLastStmt" -- | Translate let-bindings translateLet :: HsLocalBinds Id -> DsM PatVec translateLet _binds = return [] -- | Translate a pattern guard translateBind :: FamInstEnvs -> LPat Id -> LHsExpr Id -> DsM PatVec translateBind fam_insts (L _ p) e = do ps <- translatePat fam_insts p return [mkGuard ps (unLoc e)] -- | Translate a boolean guard translateBoolGuard :: LHsExpr Id -> DsM PatVec translateBoolGuard e | isJust (isTrueLHsExpr e) = return [] -- The formal thing to do would be to generate (True <- True) -- but it is trivial to solve so instead we give back an empty -- PatVec for efficiency | otherwise = return [mkGuard [truePattern] (unLoc e)] {- Note [Guards and Approximation] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Even if the algorithm is really expressive, the term oracle we use is not. Hence, several features are not translated *properly* but we approximate. The list includes: 1. View Patterns ---------------- A view pattern @(f -> p)@ should be translated to @x (p <- f x)@. The term oracle does not handle function applications so we know that the generated constraints will not be handled at the end. Hence, we distinguish between two cases: a) Pattern @p@ cannot fail. Then this is just a binding and we do the *right thing*. b) Pattern @p@ can fail. This means that when checking the guard, we will generate several cases, with no useful information. E.g.: h (f -> [a,b]) = ... h x ([a,b] <- f x) = ... uncovered set = { [x |> { False ~ (f x ~ []) }] , [x |> { False ~ (f x ~ (t1:[])) }] , [x |> { False ~ (f x ~ (t1:t2:t3:t4)) }] } So we have two problems: 1) Since we do not print the constraints in the general case (they may be too many), the warning will look like this: Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive In an equation for `h': Patterns not matched: _ _ _ Which is not short and not more useful than a single underscore. 2) The size of the uncovered set increases a lot, without gaining more expressivity in our warnings. Hence, in this case, we replace the guard @([a,b] <- f x)@ with a *dummy* @fake_pat@: @True <- _@. That is, we record that there is a possibility of failure but we minimize it to a True/False. This generates a single warning and much smaller uncovered sets. 2. Overloaded Lists ------------------- An overloaded list @[...]@ should be translated to @x ([...] <- toList x)@. The problem is exactly like above, as its solution. For future reference, the code below is the *right thing to do*: ListPat lpats elem_ty (Just (pat_ty, to_list)) otherwise -> do (xp, xe) <- mkPmId2Forms pat_ty ps <- translatePatVec (map unLoc lpats) let pats = foldr (mkListPatVec elem_ty) [nilPattern elem_ty] ps g = mkGuard pats (HsApp (noLoc to_list) xe) return [xp,g] 3. Overloaded Literals ---------------------- The case with literals is a bit different. a literal @l@ should be translated to @x (True <- x == from l)@. Since we want to have better warnings for overloaded literals as it is a very common feature, we treat them differently. They are mainly covered in Note [Undecidable Equality on Overloaded Literals] in PmExpr. 4. N+K Patterns & Pattern Synonyms ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An n+k pattern (n+k) should be translated to @x (True <- x >= k) (n <- x-k)@. Since the only pattern of the three that causes failure is guard @(n <- x-k)@, and has two possible outcomes. Hence, there is no benefit in using a dummy and we implement the proper thing. Pattern synonyms are simply not implemented yet. Hence, to be conservative, we generate a dummy pattern, assuming that the pattern can fail. 5. Actual Guards ---------------- During translation, boolean guards and pattern guards are translated properly. Let bindings though are omitted by function @translateLet@. Since they are lazy bindings, we do not actually want to generate a (strict) equality (like we do in the pattern bind case). Hence, we safely drop them. Additionally, top-level guard translation (performed by @translateGuards@) replaces guards that cannot be reasoned about (like the ones we described in 1-4) with a single @fake_pat@ to record the possibility of failure to match. Note [Translate CoPats] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The pattern match checker did not know how to handle coerced patterns `CoPat` efficiently, which gave rise to #11276. The original approach translated `CoPat`s: pat |> co ===> x (pat <- (e |> co)) Instead, we now check whether the coercion is a hole or if it is just refl, in which case we can drop it. Unfortunately, data families generate useful coercions so guards are still generated in these cases and checking data families is not really efficient. %************************************************************************ %* * Utilities for Pattern Match Checking %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Basic utilities -- | Get the type out of a PmPat. For guard patterns (ps <- e) we use the type -- of the first (or the single -WHEREVER IT IS- valid to use?) pattern pmPatType :: PmPat p -> Type pmPatType (PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = tys }) = conLikeResTy con tys pmPatType (PmVar { pm_var_id = x }) = idType x pmPatType (PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }) = pmLitType l pmPatType (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) = idType x pmPatType (PmGrd { pm_grd_pv = pv }) = (pmPatType p) where Just p = find ((==1) . patternArity) pv -- | Generate a value abstraction for a given constructor (generate -- fresh variables of the appropriate type for arguments) mkOneConFull :: Id -> ConLike -> DsM (ValAbs, ComplexEq, Bag EvVar) -- * x :: T tys, where T is an algebraic data type -- NB: in the case of a data family, T is the *representation* TyCon -- e.g. data instance T (a,b) = T1 a b -- leads to -- data TPair a b = T1 a b -- The "representation" type -- It is TPair, not T, that is given to mkOneConFull -- -- * 'con' K is a constructor of data type T -- -- After instantiating the universal tyvars of K we get -- K tys :: forall bs. Q => s1 .. sn -> T tys -- -- Results: ValAbs: K (y1::s1) .. (yn::sn) -- ComplexEq: x ~ K y1..yn -- [EvVar]: Q mkOneConFull x con = do let -- res_ty == TyConApp (ConLikeTyCon cabs_con) cabs_arg_tys res_ty = idType x (univ_tvs, ex_tvs, eq_spec, thetas, _req_theta , arg_tys, _) = conLikeFullSig con tc_args = case splitTyConApp_maybe res_ty of Just (_, tys) -> tys Nothing -> pprPanic "mkOneConFull: Not TyConApp:" (ppr res_ty) subst1 = zipTvSubst univ_tvs tc_args (subst, ex_tvs') <- cloneTyVarBndrs subst1 ex_tvs <$> getUniqueSupplyM -- Fresh term variables (VAs) as arguments to the constructor arguments <- mapM mkPmVar (substTys subst arg_tys) -- All constraints bound by the constructor (alpha-renamed) let theta_cs = substTheta subst (eqSpecPreds eq_spec ++ thetas) evvars <- mapM (nameType "pm") theta_cs let con_abs = PmCon { pm_con_con = con , pm_con_arg_tys = tc_args , pm_con_tvs = ex_tvs' , pm_con_dicts = evvars , pm_con_args = arguments } return (con_abs, (PmExprVar (idName x), vaToPmExpr con_abs), listToBag evvars) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * More smart constructors and fresh variable generation -- | Create a guard pattern mkGuard :: PatVec -> HsExpr Id -> Pattern mkGuard pv e | all cantFailPattern pv = PmGrd pv expr | PmExprOther {} <- expr = fake_pat | otherwise = PmGrd pv expr where expr = hsExprToPmExpr e -- | Create a term equality of the form: `(False ~ (x ~ lit))` mkNegEq :: Id -> PmLit -> ComplexEq mkNegEq x l = (falsePmExpr, PmExprVar (idName x) `PmExprEq` PmExprLit l) {-# INLINE mkNegEq #-} -- | Create a term equality of the form: `(x ~ lit)` mkPosEq :: Id -> PmLit -> ComplexEq mkPosEq x l = (PmExprVar (idName x), PmExprLit l) {-# INLINE mkPosEq #-} -- | Create a term equality of the form: `(x ~ x)` -- (always discharged by the term oracle) mkIdEq :: Id -> ComplexEq mkIdEq x = (PmExprVar name, PmExprVar name) where name = idName x {-# INLINE mkIdEq #-} -- | Generate a variable pattern of a given type mkPmVar :: Type -> DsM (PmPat p) mkPmVar ty = PmVar <$> mkPmId ty {-# INLINE mkPmVar #-} -- | Generate many variable patterns, given a list of types mkPmVars :: [Type] -> DsM PatVec mkPmVars tys = mapM mkPmVar tys {-# INLINE mkPmVars #-} -- | Generate a fresh `Id` of a given type mkPmId :: Type -> DsM Id mkPmId ty = getUniqueM >>= \unique -> let occname = mkVarOccFS (fsLit (show unique)) name = mkInternalName unique occname noSrcSpan in return (mkLocalId name ty) -- | Generate a fresh term variable of a given and return it in two forms: -- * A variable pattern -- * A variable expression mkPmId2Forms :: Type -> DsM (Pattern, LHsExpr Id) mkPmId2Forms ty = do x <- mkPmId ty return (PmVar x, noLoc (HsVar (noLoc x))) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Converting between Value Abstractions, Patterns and PmExpr -- | Convert a value abstraction an expression vaToPmExpr :: ValAbs -> PmExpr vaToPmExpr (PmCon { pm_con_con = c, pm_con_args = ps }) = PmExprCon c (map vaToPmExpr ps) vaToPmExpr (PmVar { pm_var_id = x }) = PmExprVar (idName x) vaToPmExpr (PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }) = PmExprLit l vaToPmExpr (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) = PmExprVar (idName x) -- | Convert a pattern vector to a list of value abstractions by dropping the -- guards (See Note [Translating As Patterns]) coercePatVec :: PatVec -> [ValAbs] coercePatVec pv = concatMap coercePmPat pv -- | Convert a pattern to a list of value abstractions (will be either an empty -- list if the pattern is a guard pattern, or a singleton list in all other -- cases) by dropping the guards (See Note [Translating As Patterns]) coercePmPat :: Pattern -> [ValAbs] coercePmPat (PmVar { pm_var_id = x }) = [PmVar { pm_var_id = x }] coercePmPat (PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }) = [PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }] coercePmPat (PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = arg_tys , pm_con_tvs = tvs, pm_con_dicts = dicts , pm_con_args = args }) = [PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = arg_tys , pm_con_tvs = tvs, pm_con_dicts = dicts , pm_con_args = coercePatVec args }] coercePmPat (PmGrd {}) = [] -- drop the guards -- | Check whether a data constructor is the only way to construct -- a data type. singleConstructor :: ConLike -> Bool singleConstructor (RealDataCon dc) = case tyConDataCons (dataConTyCon dc) of [_] -> True _ -> False singleConstructor _ = False -- | For a given conlike, finds all the sets of patterns which could -- be relevant to that conlike by consulting the result type. -- -- These come from two places. -- 1. From data constructors defined with the result type constructor. -- 2. From `COMPLETE` pragmas which have the same type as the result -- type constructor. allCompleteMatches :: ConLike -> [Type] -> DsM [(Provenance, [ConLike])] allCompleteMatches cl tys = do let fam = case cl of RealDataCon dc -> [(FromBuiltin, map RealDataCon (tyConDataCons (dataConTyCon dc)))] PatSynCon _ -> [] pragmas <- case splitTyConApp_maybe (conLikeResTy cl tys) of Just (tc, _) -> dsGetCompleteMatches tc Nothing -> return [] let fams cm = fmap (FromComplete,) $ mapM dsLookupConLike (completeMatchConLikes cm) from_pragma <- mapM fams pragmas let final_groups = fam ++ from_pragma tracePmD "allCompleteMatches" (ppr final_groups) return final_groups -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Types and constraints newEvVar :: Name -> Type -> EvVar newEvVar name ty = mkLocalId name (toTcType ty) nameType :: String -> Type -> DsM EvVar nameType name ty = do unique <- getUniqueM let occname = mkVarOccFS (fsLit (name++"_"++show unique)) idname = mkInternalName unique occname noSrcSpan return (newEvVar idname ty) {- %************************************************************************ %* * The type oracle %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- | Check whether a set of type constraints is satisfiable. tyOracle :: Bag EvVar -> PmM Bool tyOracle evs = liftD $ do { ((_warns, errs), res) <- initTcDsForSolver $ tcCheckSatisfiability evs ; case res of Just sat -> return sat Nothing -> pprPanic "tyOracle" (vcat $ pprErrMsgBagWithLoc errs) } {- %************************************************************************ %* * Sanity Checks %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- | The arity of a pattern/pattern vector is the -- number of top-level patterns that are not guards type PmArity = Int -- | Compute the arity of a pattern vector -- patVecArity :: PatVec -> PmArity -- patVecArity = sum . map patternArity -- | Compute the arity of a pattern patternArity :: Pattern -> PmArity patternArity (PmGrd {}) = 0 patternArity _other_pat = 1 {- %************************************************************************ %* * Heart of the algorithm: Function pmcheck %* * %************************************************************************ Main functions are: * mkInitialUncovered :: [Id] -> PmM Uncovered Generates the initial uncovered set. Term and type constraints in scope are checked, if they are inconsistent, the set is empty, otherwise, the set contains only a vector of variables with the constraints in scope. * pmcheck :: PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult Checks redundancy, coverage and inaccessibility, using auxilary functions `pmcheckGuards` and `pmcheckHd`. Mainly handles the guard case which is common in all three checks (see paper) and calls `pmcheckGuards` when the whole clause is checked, or `pmcheckHd` when the pattern vector does not start with a guard. * pmcheckGuards :: [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult Processes the guards. * pmcheckHd :: Pattern -> PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValAbs -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult Worker: This function implements functions `covered`, `uncovered` and `divergent` from the paper at once. Slightly different from the paper because it does not even produce the covered and uncovered sets. Since we only care about whether a clause covers SOMETHING or if it may forces ANY argument, we only store a boolean in both cases, for efficiency. -} -- | Lift a pattern matching action from a single value vector abstration to a -- value set abstraction, but calling it on every vector and the combining the -- results. runMany :: (ValVec -> PmM PartialResult) -> (Uncovered -> PmM PartialResult) runMany _ [] = return mempty runMany pm (m:ms) = mappend <$> pm m <*> runMany pm ms -- | Generate the initial uncovered set. It initializes the -- delta with all term and type constraints in scope. mkInitialUncovered :: [Id] -> PmM Uncovered mkInitialUncovered vars = do ty_cs <- liftD getDictsDs tm_cs <- map toComplex . bagToList <$> liftD getTmCsDs sat_ty <- tyOracle ty_cs let initTyCs = if sat_ty then ty_cs else emptyBag initTmState = fromMaybe initialTmState (tmOracle initialTmState tm_cs) patterns = map PmVar vars -- If any of the term/type constraints are non -- satisfiable then return with the initialTmState. See #12957 return [ValVec patterns (MkDelta initTyCs initTmState)] -- | Increase the counter for elapsed algorithm iterations, check that the -- limit is not exceeded and call `pmcheck` pmcheckI :: PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult pmcheckI ps guards vva = do n <- liftD incrCheckPmIterDs tracePm "pmCheck" (ppr n <> colon <+> pprPatVec ps $$ hang (text "guards:") 2 (vcat (map pprPatVec guards)) $$ pprValVecDebug vva) res <- pmcheck ps guards vva tracePm "pmCheckResult:" (ppr res) return res {-# INLINE pmcheckI #-} -- | Increase the counter for elapsed algorithm iterations, check that the -- limit is not exceeded and call `pmcheckGuards` pmcheckGuardsI :: [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult pmcheckGuardsI gvs vva = liftD incrCheckPmIterDs >> pmcheckGuards gvs vva {-# INLINE pmcheckGuardsI #-} -- | Increase the counter for elapsed algorithm iterations, check that the -- limit is not exceeded and call `pmcheckHd` pmcheckHdI :: Pattern -> PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValAbs -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult pmcheckHdI p ps guards va vva = do n <- liftD incrCheckPmIterDs tracePm "pmCheckHdI" (ppr n <> colon <+> pprPmPatDebug p $$ pprPatVec ps $$ hang (text "guards:") 2 (vcat (map pprPatVec guards)) $$ pprPmPatDebug va $$ pprValVecDebug vva) res <- pmcheckHd p ps guards va vva tracePm "pmCheckHdI: res" (ppr res) return res {-# INLINE pmcheckHdI #-} -- | Matching function: Check simultaneously a clause (takes separately the -- patterns and the list of guards) for exhaustiveness, redundancy and -- inaccessibility. pmcheck :: PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult pmcheck [] guards vva@(ValVec [] _) | null guards = return $ mempty { presultCovered = Covered } | otherwise = pmcheckGuardsI guards vva -- Guard pmcheck (p@(PmGrd pv e) : ps) guards vva@(ValVec vas delta) -- short-circuit if the guard pattern is useless. -- we just have two possible outcomes: fail here or match and recurse -- none of the two contains any useful information about the failure -- though. So just have these two cases but do not do all the boilerplate | isFakeGuard pv e = forces . mkCons vva <$> pmcheckI ps guards vva | otherwise = do y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType p) let tm_state = extendSubst y e (delta_tm_cs delta) delta' = delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state } utail <$> pmcheckI (pv ++ ps) guards (ValVec (PmVar y : vas) delta') pmcheck [] _ (ValVec (_:_) _) = panic "pmcheck: nil-cons" pmcheck (_:_) _ (ValVec [] _) = panic "pmcheck: cons-nil" pmcheck (p:ps) guards (ValVec (va:vva) delta) = pmcheckHdI p ps guards va (ValVec vva delta) -- | Check the list of guards pmcheckGuards :: [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult pmcheckGuards [] vva = return (usimple [vva]) pmcheckGuards (gv:gvs) vva = do (PartialResult prov1 cs vsa ds) <- pmcheckI gv [] vva (PartialResult prov2 css vsas dss) <- runMany (pmcheckGuardsI gvs) vsa return $ PartialResult (prov1 `mappend` prov2) (cs `mappend` css) vsas (ds `mappend` dss) -- | Worker function: Implements all cases described in the paper for all three -- functions (`covered`, `uncovered` and `divergent`) apart from the `Guard` -- cases which are handled by `pmcheck` pmcheckHd :: Pattern -> PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValAbs -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult -- Var pmcheckHd (PmVar x) ps guards va (ValVec vva delta) | Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (PmExprVar (idName x), vaToPmExpr va) = ucon va <$> pmcheckI ps guards (ValVec vva (delta {delta_tm_cs = tm_state})) | otherwise = return mempty -- ConCon pmcheckHd ( p@(PmCon {pm_con_con = c1, pm_con_args = args1})) ps guards (va@(PmCon {pm_con_con = c2, pm_con_args = args2})) (ValVec vva delta) | c1 /= c2 = return (usimple [ValVec (va:vva) delta]) | otherwise = kcon c1 (pm_con_arg_tys p) (pm_con_tvs p) (pm_con_dicts p) <$> pmcheckI (args1 ++ ps) guards (ValVec (args2 ++ vva) delta) -- LitLit pmcheckHd (PmLit l1) ps guards (va@(PmLit l2)) vva = case eqPmLit l1 l2 of True -> ucon va <$> pmcheckI ps guards vva False -> return $ ucon va (usimple [vva]) -- ConVar pmcheckHd (p@(PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = tys })) ps guards (PmVar x) (ValVec vva delta) = do (prov, complete_match) <- select =<< liftD (allCompleteMatches con tys) cons_cs <- mapM (liftD . mkOneConFull x) complete_match inst_vsa <- flip concatMapM cons_cs $ \(va, tm_ct, ty_cs) -> do let ty_state = ty_cs `unionBags` delta_ty_cs delta -- not actually a state sat_ty <- if isEmptyBag ty_cs then return True else tyOracle ty_state return $ case (sat_ty, solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) tm_ct) of (True, Just tm_state) -> [ValVec (va:vva) (MkDelta ty_state tm_state)] _ty_or_tm_failed -> [] set_provenance prov . force_if (canDiverge (idName x) (delta_tm_cs delta)) <$> runMany (pmcheckI (p:ps) guards) inst_vsa -- LitVar pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit l)) ps guards (PmVar x) (ValVec vva delta) = force_if (canDiverge (idName x) (delta_tm_cs delta)) <$> mkUnion non_matched <$> case solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkPosEq x l) of Just tm_state -> pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmLit l) $ ValVec vva (delta {delta_tm_cs = tm_state}) Nothing -> return mempty where us | Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkNegEq x l) = [ValVec (PmNLit x [l] : vva) (delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state })] | otherwise = [] non_matched = usimple us -- LitNLit pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit l)) ps guards (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x, pm_lit_not = lits }) (ValVec vva delta) | all (not . eqPmLit l) lits , Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkPosEq x l) -- Both guards check the same so it would be sufficient to have only -- the second one. Nevertheless, it is much cheaper to check whether -- the literal is in the list so we check it first, to avoid calling -- the term oracle (`solveOneEq`) if possible = mkUnion non_matched <$> pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmLit l) (ValVec vva (delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state })) | otherwise = return non_matched where us | Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkNegEq x l) = [ValVec (PmNLit x (l:lits) : vva) (delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state })] | otherwise = [] non_matched = usimple us -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- The following three can happen only in cases like #322 where constructors -- and overloaded literals appear in the same match. The general strategy is -- to replace the literal (positive/negative) by a variable and recurse. The -- fact that the variable is equal to the literal is recorded in `delta` so -- no information is lost -- LitCon pmcheckHd (PmLit l) ps guards (va@(PmCon {})) (ValVec vva delta) = do y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType va) let tm_state = extendSubst y (PmExprLit l) (delta_tm_cs delta) delta' = delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state } pmcheckHdI (PmVar y) ps guards va (ValVec vva delta') -- ConLit pmcheckHd (p@(PmCon {})) ps guards (PmLit l) (ValVec vva delta) = do y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType p) let tm_state = extendSubst y (PmExprLit l) (delta_tm_cs delta) delta' = delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state } pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmVar y) (ValVec vva delta') -- ConNLit pmcheckHd (p@(PmCon {})) ps guards (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) vva = pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmVar x) vva -- Impossible: handled by pmcheck pmcheckHd (PmGrd {}) _ _ _ _ = panic "pmcheckHd: Guard" -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Utilities for main checking updateVsa :: (ValSetAbs -> ValSetAbs) -> (PartialResult -> PartialResult) updateVsa f p@(PartialResult { presultUncovered = old }) = p { presultUncovered = f old } -- | Initialise with default values for covering and divergent information. usimple :: ValSetAbs -> PartialResult usimple vsa = mempty { presultUncovered = vsa } -- | Take the tail of all value vector abstractions in the uncovered set utail :: PartialResult -> PartialResult utail = updateVsa upd where upd vsa = [ ValVec vva delta | ValVec (_:vva) delta <- vsa ] -- | Prepend a value abstraction to all value vector abstractions in the -- uncovered set ucon :: ValAbs -> PartialResult -> PartialResult ucon va = updateVsa upd where upd vsa = [ ValVec (va:vva) delta | ValVec vva delta <- vsa ] -- | Given a data constructor of arity `a` and an uncovered set containing -- value vector abstractions of length `(a+n)`, pass the first `n` value -- abstractions to the constructor (Hence, the resulting value vector -- abstractions will have length `n+1`) kcon :: ConLike -> [Type] -> [TyVar] -> [EvVar] -> PartialResult -> PartialResult kcon con arg_tys ex_tvs dicts = let n = conLikeArity con upd vsa = [ ValVec (va:vva) delta | ValVec vva' delta <- vsa , let (args, vva) = splitAt n vva' , let va = PmCon { pm_con_con = con , pm_con_arg_tys = arg_tys , pm_con_tvs = ex_tvs , pm_con_dicts = dicts , pm_con_args = args } ] in updateVsa upd -- | Get the union of two covered, uncovered and divergent value set -- abstractions. Since the covered and divergent sets are represented by a -- boolean, union means computing the logical or (at least one of the two is -- non-empty). mkUnion :: PartialResult -> PartialResult -> PartialResult mkUnion = mappend -- | Add a value vector abstraction to a value set abstraction (uncovered). mkCons :: ValVec -> PartialResult -> PartialResult mkCons vva = updateVsa (vva:) -- | Set the divergent set to not empty forces :: PartialResult -> PartialResult forces pres = pres { presultDivergent = Diverged } -- | Set the divergent set to non-empty if the flag is `True` force_if :: Bool -> PartialResult -> PartialResult force_if True pres = forces pres force_if False pres = pres set_provenance :: Provenance -> PartialResult -> PartialResult set_provenance prov pr = pr { presultProvenence = prov } -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Propagation of term constraints inwards when checking nested matches {- Note [Type and Term Equality Propagation] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When checking a match it would be great to have all type and term information available so we can get more precise results. For this reason we have functions `addDictsDs' and `addTmCsDs' in PmMonad that store in the environment type and term constraints (respectively) as we go deeper. The type constraints we propagate inwards are collected by `collectEvVarsPats' in HsPat.hs. This handles bug #4139 ( see example https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/4139/GADTbug.hs ) where this is needed. For term equalities we do less, we just generate equalities for HsCase. For example we accurately give 2 redundancy warnings for the marked cases: f :: [a] -> Bool f x = case x of [] -> case x of -- brings (x ~ []) in scope [] -> True (_:_) -> False -- can't happen (_:_) -> case x of -- brings (x ~ (_:_)) in scope (_:_) -> True [] -> False -- can't happen Functions `genCaseTmCs1' and `genCaseTmCs2' are responsible for generating these constraints. -} -- | Generate equalities when checking a case expression: -- case x of { p1 -> e1; ... pn -> en } -- When we go deeper to check e.g. e1 we record two equalities: -- (x ~ y), where y is the initial uncovered when checking (p1; .. ; pn) -- and (x ~ p1). genCaseTmCs2 :: Maybe (LHsExpr Id) -- Scrutinee -> [Pat Id] -- LHS (should have length 1) -> [Id] -- MatchVars (should have length 1) -> DsM (Bag SimpleEq) genCaseTmCs2 Nothing _ _ = return emptyBag genCaseTmCs2 (Just scr) [p] [var] = do fam_insts <- dsGetFamInstEnvs [e] <- map vaToPmExpr . coercePatVec <$> translatePat fam_insts p let scr_e = lhsExprToPmExpr scr return $ listToBag [(var, e), (var, scr_e)] genCaseTmCs2 _ _ _ = panic "genCaseTmCs2: HsCase" -- | Generate a simple equality when checking a case expression: -- case x of { matches } -- When checking matches we record that (x ~ y) where y is the initial -- uncovered. All matches will have to satisfy this equality. genCaseTmCs1 :: Maybe (LHsExpr Id) -> [Id] -> Bag SimpleEq genCaseTmCs1 Nothing _ = emptyBag genCaseTmCs1 (Just scr) [var] = unitBag (var, lhsExprToPmExpr scr) genCaseTmCs1 _ _ = panic "genCaseTmCs1: HsCase" {- Note [Literals in PmPat] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Instead of translating a literal to a variable accompanied with a guard, we treat them like constructor patterns. The following example from "./libraries/base/GHC/IO/Encoding.hs" shows why: mkTextEncoding' :: CodingFailureMode -> String -> IO TextEncoding mkTextEncoding' cfm enc = case [toUpper c | c <- enc, c /= '-'] of "UTF8" -> return $ UTF8.mkUTF8 cfm "UTF16" -> return $ UTF16.mkUTF16 cfm "UTF16LE" -> return $ UTF16.mkUTF16le cfm ... Each clause gets translated to a list of variables with an equal number of guards. For every guard we generate two cases (equals True/equals False) which means that we generate 2^n cases to feed the oracle with, where n is the sum of the length of all strings that appear in the patterns. For this particular example this means over 2^40 cases. Instead, by representing them like with constructor we get the following: 1. We exploit the common prefix with our representation of VSAs 2. We prune immediately non-reachable cases (e.g. False == (x == "U"), True == (x == "U")) Note [Translating As Patterns] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Instead of translating x@p as: x (p <- x) we instead translate it as: p (x <- coercePattern p) for performance reasons. For example: f x@True = 1 f y@False = 2 Gives the following with the first translation: x |> {x == False, x == y, y == True} If we use the second translation we get an empty set, independently of the oracle. Since the pattern `p' may contain guard patterns though, it cannot be used as an expression. That's why we call `coercePatVec' to drop the guard and `vaToPmExpr' to transform the value abstraction to an expression in the guard pattern (value abstractions are a subset of expressions). We keep the guards in the first pattern `p' though. %************************************************************************ %* * Pretty printing of exhaustiveness/redundancy check warnings %* * %************************************************************************ -} -- | Check whether any part of pattern match checking is enabled (does not -- matter whether it is the redundancy check or the exhaustiveness check). isAnyPmCheckEnabled :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> Bool isAnyPmCheckEnabled dflags (DsMatchContext kind _loc) = wopt Opt_WarnOverlappingPatterns dflags || exhaustive dflags kind instance Outputable ValVec where ppr (ValVec vva delta) = let (residual_eqs, subst) = wrapUpTmState (delta_tm_cs delta) vector = substInValAbs subst vva in ppr_uncovered (vector, residual_eqs) -- | Apply a term substitution to a value vector abstraction. All VAs are -- transformed to PmExpr (used only before pretty printing). substInValAbs :: PmVarEnv -> [ValAbs] -> [PmExpr] substInValAbs subst = map (exprDeepLookup subst . vaToPmExpr) -- | Wrap up the term oracle's state once solving is complete. Drop any -- information about unhandled constraints (involving HsExprs) and flatten -- (height 1) the substitution. wrapUpTmState :: TmState -> ([ComplexEq], PmVarEnv) wrapUpTmState (residual, (_, subst)) = (residual, flattenPmVarEnv subst) -- | Issue all the warnings (coverage, exhaustiveness, inaccessibility) dsPmWarn :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> PmResult -> DsM () dsPmWarn dflags ctx@(DsMatchContext kind loc) pm_result = when (flag_i || flag_u) $ do let exists_r = flag_i && notNull redundant && onlyBuiltin exists_i = flag_i && notNull inaccessible && onlyBuiltin && not is_rec_upd exists_u = flag_u && (case uncovered of TypeOfUncovered _ -> True UncoveredPatterns u -> notNull u) when exists_r $ forM_ redundant $ \(L l q) -> do putSrcSpanDs l (warnDs (Reason Opt_WarnOverlappingPatterns) (pprEqn q "is redundant")) when exists_i $ forM_ inaccessible $ \(L l q) -> do putSrcSpanDs l (warnDs (Reason Opt_WarnOverlappingPatterns) (pprEqn q "has inaccessible right hand side")) when exists_u $ putSrcSpanDs loc $ warnDs flag_u_reason $ case uncovered of TypeOfUncovered ty -> warnEmptyCase ty UncoveredPatterns candidates -> pprEqns candidates where PmResult { pmresultProvenance = prov , pmresultRedundant = redundant , pmresultUncovered = uncovered , pmresultInaccessible = inaccessible } = pm_result flag_i = wopt Opt_WarnOverlappingPatterns dflags flag_u = exhaustive dflags kind flag_u_reason = maybe NoReason Reason (exhaustiveWarningFlag kind) is_rec_upd = case kind of { RecUpd -> True; _ -> False } -- See Note [Inaccessible warnings for record updates] onlyBuiltin = prov == FromBuiltin maxPatterns = maxUncoveredPatterns dflags -- Print a single clause (for redundant/with-inaccessible-rhs) pprEqn q txt = pp_context True ctx (text txt) $ \f -> ppr_eqn f kind q -- Print several clauses (for uncovered clauses) pprEqns qs = pp_context False ctx (text "are non-exhaustive") $ \_ -> case qs of -- See #11245 [ValVec [] _] -> text "Guards do not cover entire pattern space" _missing -> let us = map ppr qs in hang (text "Patterns not matched:") 4 (vcat (take maxPatterns us) $$ dots maxPatterns us) -- Print a type-annotated wildcard (for non-exhaustive `EmptyCase`s for -- which we only know the type and have no inhabitants at hand) warnEmptyCase ty = pp_context False ctx (text "are non-exhaustive") $ \_ -> hang (text "Patterns not matched:") 4 (underscore <+> dcolon <+> ppr ty) {- Note [Inaccessible warnings for record updates] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider (Trac #12957) data T a where T1 :: { x :: Int } -> T Bool T2 :: { x :: Int } -> T a T3 :: T a f :: T Char -> T a f r = r { x = 3 } The desugarer will (conservatively generate a case for T1 even though it's impossible: f r = case r of T1 x -> T1 3 -- Inaccessible branch T2 x -> T2 3 _ -> error "Missing" We don't want to warn about the inaccessible branch because the programmer didn't put it there! So we filter out the warning here. -} -- | Issue a warning when the predefined number of iterations is exceeded -- for the pattern match checker warnPmIters :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> DsM () warnPmIters dflags (DsMatchContext kind loc) = when (flag_i || flag_u) $ do iters <- maxPmCheckIterations <$> getDynFlags putSrcSpanDs loc (warnDs NoReason (msg iters)) where ctxt = pprMatchContext kind msg is = fsep [ text "Pattern match checker exceeded" , parens (ppr is), text "iterations in", ctxt <> dot , text "(Use -fmax-pmcheck-iterations=n" , text "to set the maximun number of iterations to n)" ] flag_i = wopt Opt_WarnOverlappingPatterns dflags flag_u = exhaustive dflags kind dots :: Int -> [a] -> SDoc dots maxPatterns qs | qs `lengthExceeds` maxPatterns = text "..." | otherwise = empty -- | Check whether the exhaustiveness checker should run (exhaustiveness only) exhaustive :: DynFlags -> HsMatchContext id -> Bool exhaustive dflags = maybe False (`wopt` dflags) . exhaustiveWarningFlag -- | Denotes whether an exhaustiveness check is supported, and if so, -- via which 'WarningFlag' it's controlled. -- Returns 'Nothing' if check is not supported. exhaustiveWarningFlag :: HsMatchContext id -> Maybe WarningFlag exhaustiveWarningFlag (FunRhs {}) = Just Opt_WarnIncompletePatterns exhaustiveWarningFlag CaseAlt = Just Opt_WarnIncompletePatterns exhaustiveWarningFlag IfAlt = Nothing exhaustiveWarningFlag LambdaExpr = Just Opt_WarnIncompleteUniPatterns exhaustiveWarningFlag PatBindRhs = Just Opt_WarnIncompleteUniPatterns exhaustiveWarningFlag ProcExpr = Just Opt_WarnIncompleteUniPatterns exhaustiveWarningFlag RecUpd = Just Opt_WarnIncompletePatternsRecUpd exhaustiveWarningFlag ThPatSplice = Nothing exhaustiveWarningFlag PatSyn = Nothing exhaustiveWarningFlag ThPatQuote = Nothing exhaustiveWarningFlag (StmtCtxt {}) = Nothing -- Don't warn about incomplete patterns -- in list comprehensions, pattern guards -- etc. They are often *supposed* to be -- incomplete -- True <==> singular pp_context :: Bool -> DsMatchContext -> SDoc -> ((SDoc -> SDoc) -> SDoc) -> SDoc pp_context singular (DsMatchContext kind _loc) msg rest_of_msg_fun = vcat [text txt <+> msg, sep [ text "In" <+> ppr_match <> char ':' , nest 4 (rest_of_msg_fun pref)]] where txt | singular = "Pattern match" | otherwise = "Pattern match(es)" (ppr_match, pref) = case kind of FunRhs (L _ fun) _ _ -> (pprMatchContext kind, \ pp -> ppr fun <+> pp) _ -> (pprMatchContext kind, \ pp -> pp) ppr_pats :: HsMatchContext Name -> [Pat Id] -> SDoc ppr_pats kind pats = sep [sep (map ppr pats), matchSeparator kind, text "..."] ppr_eqn :: (SDoc -> SDoc) -> HsMatchContext Name -> [LPat Id] -> SDoc ppr_eqn prefixF kind eqn = prefixF (ppr_pats kind (map unLoc eqn)) ppr_constraint :: (SDoc,[PmLit]) -> SDoc ppr_constraint (var, lits) = var <+> text "is not one of" <+> braces (pprWithCommas ppr lits) ppr_uncovered :: ([PmExpr], [ComplexEq]) -> SDoc ppr_uncovered (expr_vec, complex) | null cs = fsep vec -- there are no literal constraints | otherwise = hang (fsep vec) 4 $ text "where" <+> vcat (map ppr_constraint cs) where sdoc_vec = mapM pprPmExprWithParens expr_vec (vec,cs) = runPmPprM sdoc_vec (filterComplex complex) {- Note [Representation of Term Equalities] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the paper, term constraints always take the form (x ~ e). Of course, a more general constraint of the form (e1 ~ e1) can always be transformed to an equivalent set of the former constraints, by introducing a fresh, intermediate variable: { y ~ e1, y ~ e1 }. Yet, implementing this representation gave rise to #11160 (incredibly bad performance for literal pattern matching). Two are the main sources of this problem (the actual problem is how these two interact with each other): 1. Pattern matching on literals generates twice as many constraints as needed. Consider the following (tests/ghci/should_run/ghcirun004): foo :: Int -> Int foo 1 = 0 ... foo 5000 = 4999 The covered and uncovered set *should* look like: U0 = { x |> {} } C1 = { 1 |> { x ~ 1 } } U1 = { x |> { False ~ (x ~ 1) } } ... C10 = { 10 |> { False ~ (x ~ 1), .., False ~ (x ~ 9), x ~ 10 } } U10 = { x |> { False ~ (x ~ 1), .., False ~ (x ~ 9), False ~ (x ~ 10) } } ... If we replace { False ~ (x ~ 1) } with { y ~ False, y ~ (x ~ 1) } we get twice as many constraints. Also note that half of them are just the substitution [x |-> False]. 2. The term oracle (`tmOracle` in deSugar/TmOracle) uses equalities of the form (x ~ e) as substitutions [x |-> e]. More specifically, function `extendSubstAndSolve` applies such substitutions in the residual constraints and partitions them in the affected and non-affected ones, which are the new worklist. Essentially, this gives quadradic behaviour on the number of the residual constraints. (This would not be the case if the term oracle used mutable variables but, since we use it to handle disjunctions on value set abstractions (`Union` case), we chose a pure, incremental interface). Now the problem becomes apparent (e.g. for clause 300): * Set U300 contains 300 substituting constraints [y_i |-> False] and 300 constraints that we know that will not reduce (stay in the worklist). * To check for consistency, we apply the substituting constraints ONE BY ONE (since `tmOracle` is called incrementally, it does not have all of them available at once). Hence, we go through the (non-progressing) constraints over and over, achieving over-quadradic behaviour. If instead we allow constraints of the form (e ~ e), * All uncovered sets Ui contain no substituting constraints and i non-progressing constraints of the form (False ~ (x ~ lit)) so the oracle behaves linearly. * All covered sets Ci contain exactly (i-1) non-progressing constraints and a single substituting constraint. So the term oracle goes through the constraints only once. The performance improvement becomes even more important when more arguments are involved. -} -- Debugging Infrastructre tracePm :: String -> SDoc -> PmM () tracePm herald doc = liftD $ tracePmD herald doc tracePmD :: String -> SDoc -> DsM () tracePmD herald doc = do dflags <- getDynFlags printer <- mkPrintUnqualifiedDs liftIO $ dumpIfSet_dyn_printer printer dflags Opt_D_dump_ec_trace (text herald $$ (nest 2 doc)) pprPmPatDebug :: PmPat a -> SDoc pprPmPatDebug (PmCon cc _arg_tys _con_tvs _con_dicts con_args) = hsep [text "PmCon", ppr cc, hsep (map pprPmPatDebug con_args)] pprPmPatDebug (PmVar vid) = text "PmVar" <+> ppr vid pprPmPatDebug (PmLit li) = text "PmLit" <+> ppr li pprPmPatDebug (PmNLit i nl) = text "PmNLit" <+> ppr i <+> ppr nl pprPmPatDebug (PmGrd pv ge) = text "PmGrd" <+> hsep (map pprPmPatDebug pv) <+> ppr ge pprPatVec :: PatVec -> SDoc pprPatVec ps = hang (text "Pattern:") 2 (brackets $ sep $ punctuate (comma <> char '\n') (map pprPmPatDebug ps)) pprValAbs :: [ValAbs] -> SDoc pprValAbs ps = hang (text "ValAbs:") 2 (brackets $ sep $ punctuate (comma) (map pprPmPatDebug ps)) pprValVecDebug :: ValVec -> SDoc pprValVecDebug (ValVec vas _d) = text "ValVec" <+> parens (pprValAbs vas)