|
Number.ResidueClass.Check |
|
|
|
Synopsis |
|
|
|
Documentation |
|
|
The best solution seems to let modulus be part of the type.
This could happen with a phantom type for modulus
and a run function like Control.Monad.ST.runST.
Then operations with non-matching moduli could be detected at compile time
and zero and one could be generated with the correct modulus.
An alternative trial can be found in module ResidueClassMaybe.
| Constructors | Cons | | modulus :: !a | | representative :: !a | |
|
| Instances | |
|
|
|
|
|
r /: m is the residue class containing r with respect to the modulus m
|
|
|
Check if two residue classes share the same modulus
|
|
|
|
fromRepresentative :: C a => a -> a -> T a | Source |
|
|
lift1 :: Eq a => (a -> a -> a) -> T a -> T a | Source |
|
|
lift2 :: Eq a => (a -> a -> a -> a) -> T a -> T a -> T a | Source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produced by Haddock version 2.4.2 |