-- | This module contains the Monad hierarchy of classes. module SubHask.Monad where import qualified Prelude as P import Prelude (replicate, zipWith, unzip) import SubHask.Algebra import SubHask.Category import SubHask.Internal.Prelude -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- class Category cat => Functor cat f where fmap :: cat a b -> cat (f a) (f b) -- | -- -- FIXME: Not all monads can be made instances of Applicative in certain subcategories of hask. -- For example, the "OrdHask" instance of "Set" requires an Ord constraint and a classical logic. -- This means that we can't support @Set (a -> b)@, which means no applicative instance. -- -- There are reasonable solutions to this problem for Set (by storing functions differently), but are there other instances where Applicative is not a monad? class Functor cat f => Applicative cat f where pure :: cat a (f a) (<*>) :: f (cat a b) -> cat (f a) (f b) -- | This class is a hack. -- We can't include the @(>>)@ operator in the @Monad@ class because it doesn't depend on the underlying category. class Then m where infixl 1 >> (>>) :: m a -> m b -> m b -- | A default implementation haskThen :: Monad Hask m => m a -> m b -> m b haskThen xs ys = xs >>= \_ -> ys -- | This is the only current alternative to the @Then@ class for supporting @(>>)@. -- The problems with this implementation are: -- 1. All those ValidCategory constraints are ugly! -- 2. We've changed the signature of @(>>)@ in a way that's incompatible with do notation. mkThen :: forall proxy cat m a b. ( Monad cat m , Cartesian cat , Concrete cat , ValidCategory cat a , ValidCategory cat (m b) ) => proxy cat -> m a -> m b -> m b mkThen _ xs ys = xs >>= (const ys :: cat a (m b)) return :: Monad Hask m => a -> m a return = return_ -- | -- -- FIXME: right now, we're including any possibly relevant operator in this class; -- the main reason is that I don't know if there will be more efficient implementations for these in different categories -- -- FIXME: think about do notation again class (Then m, Functor cat m) => Monad cat m where return_ :: ValidCategory cat a => cat a (m a) -- | join ought to have a default implementation of: -- -- > join = (>>= id) -- -- but "id" requires a "ValidCategory" constraint, so we can't use this default implementation. join :: cat (m (m a)) (m a) -- | In Hask, most people think of monads in terms of the @>>=@ operator; -- for our purposes, the reverse operator is more fundamental because it does not require the @Concrete@ constraint infixr 1 =<< (=<<) :: cat a (m b) -> cat (m a) (m b) (=<<) f = join . fmap f -- | The bind operator is used in desguaring do notation; -- unlike all the other operators, we're explicitly applying values to the arrows passed in; -- that's why we need the "Concrete" constraint infixl 1 >>= (>>=) :: Concrete cat => m a -> cat a (m b) -> m b (>>=) a f = join . fmap f $ a -- | Right-to-left Kleisli composition of monads. @('>=>')@, with the arguments flipped infixr 1 <=< (<=<) :: cat b (m c) -> cat a (m b) -> cat a (m c) f<==> (>=>) :: cat a (m b) -> cat b (m c) -> cat a (m c) (>=>) = flip (<=<) fail = error -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | Every Monad has a unique Kleisli category -- -- FIXME: should this be a GADT? newtype Kleisli cat f a b = Kleisli (cat a (f b)) instance Monad cat f => Category (Kleisli cat f) where type ValidCategory (Kleisli cat f) a = ValidCategory cat a id = Kleisli return_ (Kleisli f).(Kleisli g) = Kleisli (f<= [m a] -> m [a] {-# INLINE sequence #-} sequence ms = foldr k (return []) ms where k m m' = do { x <- m; xs <- m'; return (x:xs) } -- | Evaluate each action in the sequence from left to right, -- and ignore the results. sequence_ :: Monad Hask m => [m a] -> m () {-# INLINE sequence_ #-} sequence_ ms = foldr (>>) (return ()) ms -- | @'mapM' f@ is equivalent to @'sequence' . 'map' f@. mapM :: Monad Hask m => (a -> m b) -> [a] -> m [b] {-# INLINE mapM #-} mapM f as = sequence (map f as) -- | @'mapM_' f@ is equivalent to @'sequence_' . 'map' f@. mapM_ :: Monad Hask m => (a -> m b) -> [a] -> m () {-# INLINE mapM_ #-} mapM_ f as = sequence_ (map f as) -- | This generalizes the list-based 'filter' function. filterM :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> m Bool) -> [a] -> m [a] filterM _ [] = return [] filterM p (x:xs) = do flg <- p x ys <- filterM p xs return (if flg then x:ys else ys) -- | 'forM' is 'mapM' with its arguments flipped forM :: Monad Hask m => [a] -> (a -> m b) -> m [b] {-# INLINE forM #-} forM = flip mapM -- | 'forM_' is 'mapM_' with its arguments flipped forM_ :: Monad Hask m => [a] -> (a -> m b) -> m () {-# INLINE forM_ #-} forM_ = flip mapM_ -- | @'forever' act@ repeats the action infinitely. forever :: (Monad Hask m) => m a -> m b {-# INLINE forever #-} forever a = let a' = a >> a' in a' -- Use explicit sharing here, as it is prevents a space leak regardless of -- optimizations. -- | @'void' value@ discards or ignores the result of evaluation, such as the return value of an 'IO' action. void :: Functor Hask f => f a -> f () void = fmap (const ()) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Other monad functions -- | The 'mapAndUnzipM' function maps its first argument over a list, returning -- the result as a pair of lists. This function is mainly used with complicated -- data structures or a state-transforming monad. mapAndUnzipM :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> m (b,c)) -> [a] -> m ([b], [c]) mapAndUnzipM f xs = sequence (map f xs) >>= return . unzip -- | The 'zipWithM' function generalizes 'zipWith' to arbitrary monads. zipWithM :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> b -> m c) -> [a] -> [b] -> m [c] zipWithM f xs ys = sequence (zipWith f xs ys) -- | 'zipWithM_' is the extension of 'zipWithM' which ignores the final result. zipWithM_ :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> b -> m c) -> [a] -> [b] -> m () zipWithM_ f xs ys = sequence_ (zipWith f xs ys) {- | The 'foldM' function is analogous to 'foldl', except that its result is encapsulated in a monad. Note that 'foldM' works from left-to-right over the list arguments. This could be an issue where @('>>')@ and the `folded function' are not commutative. > foldM f a1 [x1, x2, ..., xm] == > do > a2 <- f a1 x1 > a3 <- f a2 x2 > ... > f am xm If right-to-left evaluation is required, the input list should be reversed. -} foldM :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> b -> m a) -> a -> [b] -> m a foldM _ a [] = return a foldM f a (x:xs) = f a x >>= \fax -> foldM f fax xs -- | Like 'foldM', but discards the result. foldM_ :: (Monad Hask m) => (a -> b -> m a) -> a -> [b] -> m () foldM_ f a xs = foldM f a xs >> return () -- | @'replicateM' n act@ performs the action @n@ times, -- gathering the results. replicateM :: (Monad Hask m) => Int -> m a -> m [a] replicateM n x = sequence (replicate n x) -- | Like 'replicateM', but discards the result. replicateM_ :: (Monad Hask m) => Int -> m a -> m () replicateM_ n x = sequence_ (replicate n x) {- | Conditional execution of monadic expressions. For example, > when debug (putStr "Debugging\n") will output the string @Debugging\\n@ if the Boolean value @debug@ is 'True', and otherwise do nothing. -} when :: (Monad Hask m) => Bool -> m () -> m () when p s = if p then s else return () -- | The reverse of 'when'. unless :: (Monad Hask m) => Bool -> m () -> m () unless p s = if p then return () else s -- | Promote a function to a monad. liftM :: (Monad Hask m) => (a1 -> r) -> m a1 -> m r liftM f m1 = do { x1 <- m1; return (f x1) } -- | Promote a function to a monad, scanning the monadic arguments from -- left to right. For example, -- -- > liftM2 (+) [0,1] [0,2] = [0,2,1,3] -- > liftM2 (+) (Just 1) Nothing = Nothing -- liftM2 :: (Monad Hask m) => (a1 -> a2 -> r) -> m a1 -> m a2 -> m r liftM2 f m1 m2 = do { x1 <- m1; x2 <- m2; return (f x1 x2) } -- | Promote a function to a monad, scanning the monadic arguments from -- left to right (cf. 'liftM2'). liftM3 :: (Monad Hask m) => (a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> r) -> m a1 -> m a2 -> m a3 -> m r liftM3 f m1 m2 m3 = do { x1 <- m1; x2 <- m2; x3 <- m3; return (f x1 x2 x3) } -- | Promote a function to a monad, scanning the monadic arguments from -- left to right (cf. 'liftM2'). liftM4 :: (Monad Hask m) => (a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> a4 -> r) -> m a1 -> m a2 -> m a3 -> m a4 -> m r liftM4 f m1 m2 m3 m4 = do { x1 <- m1; x2 <- m2; x3 <- m3; x4 <- m4; return (f x1 x2 x3 x4) } -- | Promote a function to a monad, scanning the monadic arguments from -- left to right (cf. 'liftM2'). liftM5 :: (Monad Hask m) => (a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> a4 -> a5 -> r) -> m a1 -> m a2 -> m a3 -> m a4 -> m a5 -> m r liftM5 f m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 = do { x1 <- m1; x2 <- m2; x3 <- m3; x4 <- m4; x5 <- m5; return (f x1 x2 x3 x4 x5) } {- | In many situations, the 'liftM' operations can be replaced by uses of 'ap', which promotes function application. > return f `ap` x1 `ap` ... `ap` xn is equivalent to > liftMn f x1 x2 ... xn -} ap :: (Monad Hask m) => m (a -> b) -> m a -> m b ap = liftM2 id