-- | Contains general underlying monad for bidirectional conversion. module Toml.Bi.Monad ( Codec (..) , BiCodec , dimap , dioptional , diwrap , () , (.=) ) where import Control.Applicative (Alternative (..), optional) import Control.Monad (MonadPlus (..)) import Data.Coerce (Coercible, coerce) {- | Monad for bidirectional conversion. Contains pair of functions: 1. How to read value of type @a@ from immutable environment context @r@? 2. How to store value of type @a@ in stateful context @w@? In practice instead of @r@ we will use some @Reader Toml@ and instead of @w@ we will use @State Toml@. This approach with the bunch of utility functions allows to have single description for from/to @TOML@ conversion. In practice this type will always be used in the following way: @ type 'BiCodec' r w a = 'Codec' r w a a @ Type parameter @c@ if fictional. Here some trick is used. This trick is implemented in the [codec](http://hackage.haskell.org/package/codec) package and described in more details in related blog post: . -} data Codec r w c a = Codec { -- | Extract value of type @a@ from monadic context @r@. codecRead :: r a -- | Store value of type @c@ inside monadic context @w@ and returning -- value of type @a@. Type of this function actually should be @a -> w ()@ but with -- such type it's impossible to have 'Monad' and other instances. , codecWrite :: c -> w a } -- | Specialized version of 'Codec' data type. This type alias is used in practice. type BiCodec r w a = Codec r w a a instance (Functor r, Functor w) => Functor (Codec r w c) where fmap :: (a -> b) -> Codec r w c a -> Codec r w c b fmap f codec = Codec { codecRead = f <$> codecRead codec , codecWrite = fmap f . codecWrite codec } instance (Applicative r, Applicative w) => Applicative (Codec r w c) where pure :: a -> Codec r w c a pure a = Codec { codecRead = pure a , codecWrite = \_ -> pure a } (<*>) :: Codec r w c (a -> b) -> Codec r w c a -> Codec r w c b codecf <*> codeca = Codec { codecRead = codecRead codecf <*> codecRead codeca , codecWrite = \c -> codecWrite codecf c <*> codecWrite codeca c } instance (Monad r, Monad w) => Monad (Codec r w c) where (>>=) :: Codec r w c a -> (a -> Codec r w c b) -> Codec r w c b codec >>= f = Codec { codecRead = codecRead codec >>= \a -> codecRead (f a) , codecWrite = \c -> codecWrite codec c >>= \a -> codecWrite (f a) c } instance (Alternative r, Alternative w) => Alternative (Codec r w c) where empty :: Codec r w c a empty = Codec { codecRead = empty , codecWrite = \_ -> empty } (<|>) :: Codec r w c a -> Codec r w c a -> Codec r w c a codec1 <|> codec2 = Codec { codecRead = codecRead codec1 <|> codecRead codec2 , codecWrite = \c -> codecWrite codec1 c <|> codecWrite codec2 c } instance (MonadPlus r, MonadPlus w) => MonadPlus (Codec r w c) where mzero = empty mplus = (<|>) -- | Alternative instance for function arrow but without 'empty'. infixl 3 () :: Alternative f => (a -> f x) -> (a -> f x) -> (a -> f x) f g = \a -> f a <|> g a {- | This is an instance of @Profunctor@ for 'Codec'. But since there's no @Profunctor@ type class in @base@ or package with no dependencies (and we don't want to bring extra dependencies) this instance is implemented as a single top-level function. Useful when you want to parse @newtype@s. For example, if you had data type like this: @ __data__ Example = Example { foo :: Bool , bar :: Text } @ Bidirectional TOML converter for this type will look like this: @ exampleCodec :: TomlCodec Example exampleCodec = Example \<$\> Toml.bool "foo" '.=' foo \<*\> Toml.text "bar" '.=' bar @ Now if you change your type in the following way: @ __newtype__ Email = Email { unEmail :: Text } __data__ Example = Example { foo :: Bool , bar :: Email } @ you need to patch your TOML codec like this: @ exampleCodec :: TomlCodec Example exampleCodec = Example \<$\> Toml.bool "foo" '.=' foo \<*\> 'dimap' unEmail Email (Toml.text "bar") '.=' bar @ -} dimap :: (Functor r, Functor w) => (c -> d) -- ^ Mapper for consumer -> (a -> b) -- ^ Mapper for producer -> Codec r w d a -- ^ Source 'Codec' object -> Codec r w c b -- ^ Target 'Codec' object dimap f g codec = Codec { codecRead = g <$> codecRead codec , codecWrite = fmap g . codecWrite codec . f } {- | Bidirectional converter for @Maybe a@ values. For example, given the data type: @ __data__ Example = Example { foo :: Bool , bar :: Maybe Int } @ the TOML codec will look like @ exampleCodec :: TomlCodec Example exampleCodec = Example \<$\> Toml.bool "foo" '.=' foo \<*\> 'dioptional' (Toml.int "bar") '.=' bar @ -} dioptional :: (Alternative r, Applicative w) => Codec r w c a -> Codec r w (Maybe c) (Maybe a) dioptional Codec{..} = Codec { codecRead = optional codecRead , codecWrite = traverse codecWrite } {- | Combinator used for @newtype@ wrappers. For example, given the data types: @ __newtype__ N = N Int __data__ Example = Example { foo :: Bool , bar :: N } @ the TOML codec can look like @ exampleCodec :: TomlCodec Example exampleCodec = Example \<$\> Toml.bool "foo" '.=' foo \<*\> 'diwrap' (Toml.int "bar") '.=' bar @ -} diwrap :: forall b a r w . (Coercible a b, Functor r, Functor w) => BiCodec r w a -> BiCodec r w b diwrap = dimap coerce coerce {- | Operator to connect two operations: 1. How to get field from object? 2. How to write this field to toml? In code this should be used like this: @ __data__ Foo = Foo { fooBar :: Int , fooBaz :: String } fooCodec :: TomlCodec Foo fooCodec = Foo \<$\> Toml.int "bar" '.=' fooBar \<*\> Toml.str "baz" '.=' fooBaz @ -} infixl 5 .= (.=) :: Codec r w field a -> (object -> field) -> Codec r w object a codec .= getter = codec { codecWrite = codecWrite codec . getter }