id summary reporter owner description type status priority milestone component version resolution keywords cc os architecture failure difficulty testcase blockedby blocking related 7246 Callstack depends on way (prof, profasm, profthreaded nomeata "Consider the attached test case. The expected output is the that of the ```prof``` way, while for ```profasm``` and ```profthreaded```, I get this result: {{{ =====> callstack003(profthreaded) 19 of 21 [0, 1, 0] cd . && '/home/jojo/dokumente/Uni/info/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -o callstack003 callstack003.hs -O -prof -auto-all -threaded -fprof-auto-calls -fno-full-laziness -fno-state-hack >callstack003.comp.stderr 2>&1 cd . && ./callstack003 +RTS -p -RTS callstack003.run.stdout 2>callstack003.run.stderr Actual stdout output differs from expected: --- ./callstack003.stdout 2012-09-17 11:27:02.607458948 +0200 +++ ./callstack003.run.stdout 2012-09-17 12:20:33.988109494 +0200 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-17)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:22-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-17)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:22-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-17)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:22-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-17)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] -[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:22-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] +[""Main.CAF ()"",""Main.main (callstack003.hs:9:8-21)"",""Main.doTwice (callstack003.hs:10:15-24)"",""Main.f (callstack003.hs:7:11-36)""] *** unexpected failure for callstack003(profthreaded) }}} Not sure if this really hurts anyone, and the behavior of the call stack WRT recursive calls is anyways not quite perfect yet (see #7240), this makes adding good test cases a bit difficult." bug new normal 7.8.1 Profiling 7.6.1 Unknown/Multiple Unknown/Multiple Incorrect result at runtime Unknown