Changes between Version 21 and Version 22 of Records/NameSpacing

Timestamp:

01/09/12 00:42:34 (17 months ago)

Author:

GregWeber

Comment:

--

Records/NameSpacing

@@ -201 +201 @@
 }}}
 
-It bothers some that the code does not look like the previous `b a r` - chiefly that the record is now in the middle. Chaining can make this perception even worse: `e d r.a.b.c`
+It bothers some that the code does not look like the previous `b a r` - chiefly that the record is now in the middle. Chaining can make this perception even worse: `(e . d) r.a.b.c`
 
 Is it possible we can have an equivalent of the dot that changes the ordering? `b a.@r` is possible, but requires an operator that binds tightly to the right.
@@ -211 +211 @@
 So if we have a function `f r = b r.a` then one can write it points-free: `b . .a`
 
-Our longer example from above: `e d . .c . .b . .a`
+Our longer example from above: `e . d . .c . .b . .a`
 
 At first glance it may look odd, but it is starting to grow on me. Also let us consider real use with longer names:
 {{{
-echo delta . .charlie . .beta . .alpha
+echo . delta . .charlie . .beta . .alpha
 }}}