Ticket #225 (new enhancement)
allow installing just specific bits, like just docs
| Reported by: | duncan | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Cabal-1.8 |
| Component: | Cabal library | Version: | 1.2.3.0 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | peteg42@…, avatar@…, bos@… | Difficulty: | normal |
| GHC Version: | 6.8.2 | Platform: |
Description
Sometimes people would like to build and install just part of a cabal project, e.g. the documentation or one of the libraries or binaries. Specific use-cases are packaging for OS distro's and generating Haddock docs for code that was installed without it (cf the current state of Debian-stable).
Igloo proposes the following user interface:
As long as docs, license and binaries can be (de)selected individually I don't really mind.
If you want a concrete suggestion, we could have --foo and --no-foo for each thing, with the default being --all and the command line being processed left-to-right, e.g.
cabal install --no-haddock-interfaces --docs --no-html
would install
- all (which wouldn't actually contain anything)
- docs (which wouldn't actually contain anything)
- haddock-interfaces
- license
- everything under binaries
I broadly agree, but am slightly concerned there are dependencies amongst the various things that his syntax does not respect (e.g. one may need to install the libraries - e.g. one depending on a foreign library - in order to get a binary working). So either we have to vet the command lines or coarsen the flags. I hope Duncan and Igloo can draw on their packaging experience and determine what is actually useful.
