Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of NewLibraryCandidates

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/29/05 16:54:49 (7 years ago)
Author:
john@…
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • NewLibraryCandidates

    v4 v5  
     1suggestions should go under the heading that best describes the reasons they should be included. 
     2 
     3 
     4== Require or could use compiler support == 
     5 
    16 * Data.Typeable 
    27 * Data.Dynamic 
     8 * Control.Monad.Fix (for the IO instance) 
     9 
     10== useful in interfaces between unrleated modules == 
    311 
    412 * Data.Map 
    513 * Data.Set 
     14 * Data.Monoid 
    615 
    7  * ReadP and assosiated changes to the 'Read' class. 
     16 
     17== generally useful/improvements == 
     18 
     19 * ReadP and assosiated changes to the 'Read' class - the current Read specified by the report leaks memory like a fish and ReadP is signifigantly faster/better. We would also get a basic parsing library with the deal. 
     20 
     21 
    822 
    923 * Is there a point to have a library codified in the standard when the fptools library is the de-facto standard anyway?  Does it make a practical difference for anyone?