{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-} {-# LANGUAGE PatternGuards #-} module Agda.TypeChecking.Coverage.Match where import Control.Applicative import Control.Monad.State import qualified Data.List as List import Data.Maybe (mapMaybe) import Data.Monoid import Data.Traversable (traverse) import Agda.Syntax.Abstract (IsProjP(..)) import Agda.Syntax.Common import Agda.Syntax.Internal import Agda.Syntax.Internal.Pattern () import Agda.Syntax.Literal import Agda.Utils.Permutation import Agda.Utils.Size import Agda.Utils.List #include "undefined.h" import Agda.Utils.Impossible {-| Given 1. the function clauses @cs@ 2. the patterns @ps@ we want to compute a variable index of the split clause to split on next. First, we find the set @cs'@ of all the clauses that are instances (via substitutions @rhos@) of the split clause. In these substitutions, we look for a column that has only constructor patterns. We try to split on this column first. -} -- | Match the given patterns against a list of clauses match :: [Clause] -> [Arg DeBruijnPattern] -> Match (Nat,[MPat]) match cs ps = foldr choice No $ zipWith matchIt [0..] cs where mps = buildMPatterns ps -- If liberal matching on literals fails or blocks we go with that. -- If it succeeds we use the result from conservative literal matching. -- This is to make sure that we split enough when literals are involved. -- For instance, -- f ('x' :: 'y' :: _) = ... -- f (c :: s) = ... -- would never split the tail of the list if we only used conservative -- literal matching. matchIt i c = matchClause yesMatchLit mps i c +++ matchClause noMatchLit mps i c Yes _ +++ m = m No +++ _ = No Block x +++ _ = Block x BlockP +++ _ = BlockP -- | We use a special representation of the patterns we're trying to match -- against a clause. In particular we want to keep track of which variables -- are blocking a match. data MPat = VarMP Nat -- ^ De Bruijn index (usually, rightmost variable in patterns is 0). | ConMP ConHead (Maybe ConPOrigin) [Arg MPat] | LitMP Literal | DotMP MPat -- ^ For keeping track of the original dot positions. | WildMP -- ^ For dot patterns that cannot be turned into patterns. | ProjMP QName -- ^ Projection copattern. deriving (Show) buildMPatterns :: [Arg DeBruijnPattern] -> [Arg MPat] buildMPatterns ps = map (fmap build) ps where build (VarP (i,_)) = VarMP i build (ConP con i ps) = ConMP con (conPRecord i) $ buildMPatterns $ map (fmap namedThing) $ ps build (DotP t) = DotMP $ buildT t build (LitP l) = LitMP l build (ProjP dest) = ProjMP dest buildT (Con c args) = ConMP c Nothing $ map (fmap buildT) args buildT (Var i []) = VarMP i buildT (Shared p) = buildT (derefPtr p) buildT _ = WildMP isTrivialMPattern :: MPat -> Bool isTrivialMPattern VarMP{} = True isTrivialMPattern (ConMP c (Just _) ps) = all isTrivialMPattern $ map unArg ps isTrivialMPattern (ConMP c Nothing ps) = False isTrivialMPattern LitMP{} = False isTrivialMPattern DotMP{} = True isTrivialMPattern WildMP{} = True isTrivialMPattern ProjMP{} = False -- or True? -- | If matching is inconclusive (@Block@) we want to know which -- variables are blocking the match. data Match a = Yes a -- ^ Matches unconditionally. | No -- ^ Definitely does not match. | Block BlockingVars -- ^ Could match if non-empty list of blocking variables -- is instantiated properly. | BlockP -- ^ Could match if split on possible projections is performed. deriving (Functor) -- | Variable blocking a match. data BlockingVar = BlockingVar { blockingVarNo :: Nat -- ^ De Bruijn index of variable blocking the match. , blockingVarCons :: Maybe [ConHead] -- ^ @Nothing@ means there is an overlapping match for this variable. -- This happens if one clause has a constructor pattern at this position, -- and another a variable. It is also used for "just variable". -- -- @Just cons@ means that it is an non-overlapping match and -- @cons@ are the encountered constructors. } deriving (Show) type BlockingVars = [BlockingVar] mapBlockingVarCons :: (Maybe [ConHead] -> Maybe [ConHead]) -> BlockingVar -> BlockingVar mapBlockingVarCons f b = b { blockingVarCons = f (blockingVarCons b) } clearBlockingVarCons :: BlockingVar -> BlockingVar clearBlockingVarCons = mapBlockingVarCons $ const Nothing overlapping :: BlockingVars -> BlockingVars overlapping = map clearBlockingVarCons -- | Left dominant merge of blocking vars. zipBlockingVars :: BlockingVars -> BlockingVars -> BlockingVars zipBlockingVars xs ys = map upd xs where upd (BlockingVar x (Just cons)) | Just (BlockingVar _ (Just cons')) <- List.find ((x ==) . blockingVarNo) ys = BlockingVar x (Just $ cons ++ cons') upd (BlockingVar x _) = BlockingVar x Nothing -- | @choice m m'@ combines the match results @m@ of a function clause -- with the (already combined) match results $m'$ of the later clauses. -- It is for skipping clauses that definitely do not match ('No'). -- It is left-strict, to be used with @foldr@. -- If one clause unconditionally matches ('Yes') we do not look further. choice :: Match a -> Match a -> Match a choice (Yes a) _ = Yes a choice (Block x) (Block y) = Block (zipBlockingVars x y) choice (Block x) (Yes _) = Block $ overlapping x choice (Block x) _ = Block x choice BlockP m = BlockP choice No m = m type MatchLit = Literal -> MPat -> Match [MPat] noMatchLit :: MatchLit noMatchLit _ _ = No yesMatchLit :: MatchLit yesMatchLit _ q@VarMP{} = Yes [q] yesMatchLit _ q@WildMP{} = Yes [q] yesMatchLit _ _ = No -- | Check if a clause could match given generously chosen literals matchLits :: Clause -> [Arg DeBruijnPattern] -> Bool matchLits c ps = case matchClause yesMatchLit (buildMPatterns ps) 0 c of Yes _ -> True _ -> False -- | @matchClause mlit qs i c@ checks whether clause @c@ number @i@ -- covers a split clause with patterns @qs@. matchClause :: MatchLit -> [Arg MPat] -> Nat -> Clause -> Match (Nat,[MPat]) matchClause mlit qs i c = (\q -> (i,q)) <$> matchPats mlit (clausePats c) qs -- | @matchPats mlit ps qs@ checks whether a function clause with patterns -- @ps@ covers a split clause with patterns @qs@. -- -- Issue 842: if in case of functions with varying arity, -- the split clause has proper patterns left, we refuse to match, -- because it would be troublesome to construct the split tree later. -- We would have to move bindings from the rhs to the lhs. -- For example, this is rejected: -- @ -- F : Bool -> Set1 -- F true = Set -- F = \ x -> Set -- @ matchPats :: MatchLit -> [Arg (Pattern' a)] -> [Arg MPat] -> Match [MPat] matchPats mlit ps qs = mconcat $ properMatchesLeft : zipWith (matchPat mlit) (map unArg ps) (map unArg qs) ++ [ projPatternsLeft ] where projPatternsLeft = let psrest = map unArg $ drop (length qs) ps in if null $ mapMaybe isProjP psrest -- not $ any properlyMatching psrest then Yes [] -- no proj. patterns left else BlockP -- proj. patterns left properMatchesLeft = if any (properMatch . unArg) $ drop (length ps) qs then No else Yes [] properMatch ConMP{} = True properMatch LitMP{} = True properMatch _ = False -- | Combine results of checking whether function clause patterns -- covers split clause patterns. -- -- 'No' is dominant: if one function clause pattern is disjoint to -- the corresponding split clause pattern, then -- the whole clauses are disjoint. -- -- 'Yes' is neutral: for a match, all patterns have to match. -- -- 'Block' accumulates variables of the split clause -- that have to be instantiated -- to make the split clause an instance of the function clause. -- -- 'BlockP' yields to 'Block', since blocking vars can also -- block the result type. instance Monoid a => Monoid (Match a) where mempty = Yes mempty Yes a `mappend` Yes b = Yes $ mappend a b Yes _ `mappend` m = m No `mappend` _ = No Block x `mappend` No = No Block x `mappend` Block y = Block $ mappend x y Block x `mappend` _ = Block x BlockP `mappend` No = No BlockP `mappend` Block y = Block y BlockP `mappend` _ = BlockP -- | @matchPat mlit p q@ checks whether a function clause pattern @p@ -- covers a split clause pattern @q@. There are three results: -- @Yes ()@ means it covers, because @p@ is a variable -- pattern or @q@ is a wildcard. -- @No@ means it does not cover. -- @Block [x]@ means @p@ is a proper instance of @q@ and could become -- a cover if @q@ was split on variable @x@. matchPat :: MatchLit -> Pattern' a -> MPat -> Match [MPat] matchPat _ (VarP _) q = Yes [q] matchPat _ (DotP _) q = Yes [] -- Jesper, 2014-11-04: putting 'Yes [q]' here triggers issue 1333. -- Not checking for trivial MPats should be safe here, as dot patterns are -- guaranteed to match if the rest of the pattern does, so some extra splitting -- on them doesn't change the reduction behaviour. matchPat mlit p (DotMP q) = matchPat mlit p q matchPat mlit (LitP l) q = mlit l q matchPat _ (ProjP d) (ProjMP d') = if d == d' then Yes [] else No matchPat _ (ProjP d) _ = __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- matchPat mlit (ConP c (Just _) ps) q | recordPattern ps = Yes () -- Andreas, 2012-07-25 record patterns always match! matchPat mlit (ConP c _ ps) q = case q of VarMP x -> Block [BlockingVar x (Just [c])] WildMP{} -> No -- Andreas, 2013-05-15 this was "Yes()" triggering issue 849 ConMP c' i qs | c == c' -> matchPats mlit (map (fmap namedThing) ps) qs | otherwise -> No LitMP _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ ProjMP _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ DotMP _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ {- UNUSED class RecordPattern a where recordPattern :: a -> Bool instance RecordPattern Pattern where recordPattern VarP{} = True recordPattern DotP{} = False recordPattern LitP{} = False recordPattern (ConP _ Nothing _) = False recordPattern (ConP _ (Just _) ps) = recordPattern ps instance RecordPattern a => RecordPattern [a] where recordPattern = all recordPattern instance RecordPattern a => RecordPattern (Arg a) where recordPattern = recordPattern . unArg -}