# Summary Data structure intended for accumulating a sequence of elements for later traversal or folding. A great basis for implementing many custom monoids, most notably of the Builder pattern. It shines with its Monoid instance, which relieves the user from caring about from which side to append. This is important because, different data-structures exhibit very different performance depending on that. Most notably List. Acc on the other hand is neutral and performs well in all scenarios. For such purposes it is common to use Seq or DList. The benchmark results below show that Acc is a better fit. # Benchmark results These benchmarks compare the performance of acc vs. various other structures as used for aggregation with intent of reduction. In other words a two-step process of the following structure is measured as a whole: 1. Construct the measured data-structure using a particular method (cons, snoc, fromList) 2. Fold the data-structure into a final result (sum, length) Following are the highlights from the benchmark results grouped by the method of construction of the datastructure. ### Consing 1000 elements ``` acc 12.40 μs list 18.70 μs dlist 43.95 μs sequence 27.54 μs ``` ### Snocing 1000 elements ``` acc 17.02 μs dlist 38.93 μs sequence 27.15 μs ``` _No List here because it will blow up the memory._ ### Construction from a list of 1000 elements ``` acc 13.27 μs list 12.97 μs dlist 27.57 μs sequence 10.70 μs ``` ### Appending chunks of 1000 elements 1000 times from left ``` acc 4.256 ms list 553.7 ms dlist 315.9 ms sequence 10.05 ms ``` ### Appending chunks of 1000 elements 1000 times from right ``` acc 4.305 ms list 5.126 s dlist 360.4 ms sequence 7.209 ms ``` --- For complete results see [the dump](bench-results). _Executed on an AWS c6i.2xlarge instance running Ubuntu._ ## Conclusions Given the preconditions of the benchmarks, the following can be concluded: - Neither List or DList are suitable as monoidal structures, due to exponential performance degradation on appends from both sides - Snocing and even consing Acc is better than all alternatives - Acc performs better than Seq on both left- and right-appends (2-3x) - Seq gets constructed from list faster than Acc (1.5x)