>>===== MODE =====>>
citation
<<===== MODE =====<<
That is to say, rich text markup is not parsed on numeric fields with
numeric content.
This is the result in citeproc-js, but the correct behavior under CSL
at large is TBD.
As of this writing (2018-05-05), citeproc-js DOES parse rich text
markup in numeric fields if the field contains no numeric value
(not demonstrated by this fixture, but it is so). This inconsistency,
at least, is not desirable.
>>===== RESULT =====>>
1<sup>er</sup>
<<===== RESULT =====<<
>>===== CSL =====>>
<<===== CSL =====<<
>>===== INPUT =====>>
[
{
"id": "ITEM-1",
"number": "1er",
"type": ""
}
]
<<===== INPUT =====<<
>>===== VERSION =====>>
1.0
<<===== VERSION =====<<