Safe Haskell | Safe-Inferred |
---|---|
Language | Haskell2010 |
This module contains no code. Its purpose is to explain the overall architecture of the code base, with links to the relevant modules and definitions. It is intended for people who intend to hack on the compiler itself, not for those who just want to use its public API as a library. Most of what's here discusses the compiler itself, but we'll also provide pointers for where to find the code for the various other tools and subcommands.
Much of the documentation here is by referencing other modules that contain more information. Make sure to follow the links. Also, make sure to click the *source* links to study the actual code. Many of the links are provided not because the exposed module API is particularly interesting, but because their implementation is.
Compiler
At a very high level, the Futhark compiler has a fairly conventional architecture. After reading and type-checking a program, it is gradually transformed, passing through a variety of different intermediate representations (IRs), where the specifics depend on which code generator is intended. The final result is then written to one or more files. We can divide the compiler into roughly three parts: frontend, middle-end [sic], and backend.
Frontend
The frontend of the compiler is concerned with parsing the Futhark source language, type-checking it, and transforming it to the core IR used by the middle-end of the compiler. The following modules are of particular interest:
- Language.Futhark.Syntax contains the source language AST definition.
- Language.Futhark.Parser contains parsers for the source language and various fragments.
- Futhark.Compiler and Futhark.Compiler.Program contains functions for conveniently reading and type-checking an entire Futhark source program, chasing down imports, and so on.
- Language.Futhark.TypeChecker is the type checker itself.
- Internalisation of the source language to the core IR is in Futhark.Internalise.
Middle-end
The compiler middle-end is based around passes that are
essentially pure functions that accept a program as input and
produce a program as output. A composition of such passes is
called a pipeline. The various compiler backends (futhark
opencl
, futhark multicore
, etc) use different pipelines. See
Futhark.Pass and (less importantly) Futhark.Pipeline. The
actual pipelines we use are in Futhark.Passes.
The compiler front-end produces a core IR program that is then processed by a pipeline in the middle-end. The fundamental structure of this IR is defined in Futhark.IR.Syntax. As mentioned in that module, the IR supports multiple representations. The middle-end always starts with the program in the SOACS representation (Futhark.IR.SOACS), which closely resembles the kind of free-form nested parallelism that the source language permits. Depending on the specific compilation pipeline, the program will eventually be transformed to various other representations. The output of the middle-end is always a core IR program in some representation (probably not the same one that it started with).
Many passes will involve constructing core IR AST fragments. See Futhark.Construct for advice and guidance on how to do that.
Main representations
- Futhark.IR.SOACS: the initial core representation of any Futhark program. This is the representation on which we perform optimisations such as fusion, inlining, and a host of other cleanup.
- Futhark.IR.GPU: a representation where parallelism is expressed
with flat segmented operations, and a few other GPU-specific
operations are also supported. The pass
Futhark.Pass.ExtractKernels transforms a
SOACS
program to aGPU
program. - Futhark.IR.MC: a representation where parallelism is expressed
with flat segmented operations, and a few other multicore-specific
operations are also supported. The pass
Futhark.Pass.ExtractMulticore transforms a
SOACS
program to aMC
program. - Futhark.IR.GPUMem: like
GPU
, but with memory information. See Futhark.IR.Mem for information on how we represent memory in the Futhark compiler. This representation is produced by Futhark.Pass.ExplicitAllocations.GPU - Futhark.IR.MCMem: the multicore counterpart to
GPUMem
. Produced by Futhark.Pass.ExplicitAllocations.MC.
Backend
The backend accepts a program in some core IR representation.
Currently this must always be a representation with memory
information (e.g. GPUMem
). It then translates
the program to the imperative IR, which we call ImpCode.
- Futhark.CodeGen.ImpCode: The main definition of ImpCode, which is an extensible representation like the core IR.
- Futhark.CodeGen.ImpCode.GPU: an example of ImpCode extended/specialised to handle GPU operations (but at a high level, before generating actual CUDA/OpenCL kernel code).
- Futhark.CodeGen.ImpGen: a translator from core IR to ImpCode. Heavily parameterised so that it can handle the various dialects of both core IR and ImpCode that it must be expected to work with. In practice, when adding a new backend (or modifying an existing one), you'll be working on more specialised modules such as Futhark.CodeGen.ImpGen.GPU.
Ultimately, ImpCode must then be translated to some real executable language, which in our case means C or Python.
- Futhark.CodeGen.Backends.GenericC: framework for translating ImpCode to C. Rather convoluted because it is used in a large number of settings. The module Futhark.CodeGen.Backends.SequentialC shows perhaps the simplest use of it.
- Futhark.CodeGen.Backends.GenericPython: the generic Python code generator (see Futhark.CodeGen.Backends.SequentialPython for a usage example).
Command line interface
The futhark
program dispatches to a Haskell-level main function
based on its first argument (the subcommand). Some of these
subcommands are implemented as their own modules under the
Futhark.CLI
hierarchy. Others, particularly the simplest ones,
are bundled together in Futhark.CLI.Misc.