%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : debruijn_n2 : Dyckhoff's benchmark formulae (1997) % Domain : Syntactic % Problem : de Bruijn's example % Version : Especial. % Problem formulation : Inuit. Invalid. Size 2 % English : LHS(2*N) -> (p0 | RHS(2*N) | ~p0) % RHS(m) = &&_{i=1..m} p(i), % LHS(m) = &&_{i=1..m} ((p(i)<=>p(i+1)) => c(N)) % where addition is computed modulo m, and with % c(N) = &&_{i=1..N} p(i) % Refs : [Dyc97] Roy Dyckhoff. Some benchmark formulae for % intuitionistic propositional logic. At % http://www.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~rd/logic/marks.html % : "de Bruijn, N.: personal communication in about 1990." % Source : [Dyc97] % Names : % Status : Non-Theorem % Rating : 0.60 v 1.0 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 0 unit) % Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equality) % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 5 average) % Number of connectives : 26 ( 1 ~ ; 2 |; 15 &) % ( 4 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=) % ( 0 <~>; 0 ~|; 0 ~&) % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 propositional; 0-0 arity) % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 constant; --- arity) % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 singleton; 0 !; 0 ?) % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 average) % Comments : "quite a tough exercise for students to prove by natural % deduction" [Dyc97] % : tptp2X -f ljt debruijn_n.002.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ f(( % axiom1, axiom. (( ( p1 <-> p2 ) -> ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & p4 ) ) ) )) & % axiom2, axiom. (( ( p2 <-> p3 ) -> ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & p4 ) ) ) )) & % axiom3, axiom. (( ( p3 <-> p4 ) -> ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & p4 ) ) ) )) & % axiom4, axiom. (( ( p4 <-> p1 ) -> ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & p4 ) ) ) )) -> % conjecture_name, conjecture. (( p0 v ( ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & p4 ) ) ) v ( ~ p0 ) ) )) )). %------------------------------------------------------------------------------