%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : prop_n2 : JProver test formulae (2000) % Domain : Syntactic % Problem : % Version : Especial. % Problem formulation : Intuit. Valid Size 2 % English : % Refs : [SN00] S. Schmitt & A. Nogin: test module "jprover_tests.ml", % test formulas for JProver in MetaPRL, at % http://cvs.metaprl.org:12000/cvsweb/metaprl/theories/ % itt/jprover_tests.ml % [ES99] U. Egly & S. Schmitt. On intuitionistic proof % transformations, their complexity, and application to % constructive program synthesis. In Fundamenta % Informaticae, Special Issue: Symbolic Computation and % Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 1/2, p. 59-83, 1999 % Source : [SN00] % Names : % Status : Theorem % Rating : 0.00 v 1.0 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 1 unit) % Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equality) % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 average) % Number of connectives : 9 ( 0 ~ ; 6 |; 2 &) % ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=) % ( 0 <~>; 0 ~|; 0 ~&) % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 propositional; 0-0 arity) % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 constant; --- arity) % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 singleton; 0 !; 0 ?) % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 average) % Comments : cause exponential proof length in EVERY LJ proof wrt. the % proof length of a given LJmc proof in propositional % intuitionistic logic % : tptp2X -f ljt sch_prop_n.002.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ f(( % axiom1, axiom. (a2) & % axiom2, axiom. (( b -> ( ( b1 v a1 ) v b1 ) )) & % axiom3, axiom. (( ( b v a ) v b )) -> % conjecture_name, conjecture. (( a v ( ( b & a1 ) v ( b1 & a2 ) ) )) )). %------------------------------------------------------------------------------