{-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-} {-| The 'Proxy' class defines the library's core API. Everything else in this library builds exclusively on top of the 'Proxy' type class so that all proxy implementations and extensions can share the same standard library. Several of these type classes duplicate methods from familiar type-classes (such as ('?>=') duplicating ('>>=')). You do NOT need to use these duplicate methods. Instead, read the \"Polymorphic proxies\" section below which explains their purpose and how they help clean up type signatures. -} module Control.Proxy.Class ( -- * Core proxy class Proxy(..), idT, coidT, (<-<), (<~<), -- * request/respond substitution Interact(..), (/ lift . k >-> p > > hoist f . k >-> p -} infixr 7 <-< infixl 7 >-> infixr 8 /\ infixl 8 \<\ infixr 8 />/ infixl 1 ?>= -- This should match the fixity of >>= {-| The core API for the @pipes@ library You should only use 'request', 'respond', and ('>->') I only provide ('>~>') for theoretical symmetry, and the remaining methods just implement internal type class plumbing. -} class Proxy p where {-| 'request' input from upstream, passing an argument with the request @request a'@ passes @a'@ as a parameter to upstream that upstream may use to decide what response to return. 'request' binds the upstream's response of type @a@ to its own return value. -} request :: (Monad m) => a' -> p a' a b' b m a {-| 'respond' with an output for downstream and bind downstream's next 'request' @respond b@ satisfies a downstream 'request' by supplying the value @b@. 'respond' blocks until downstream 'request's a new value and binds the argument of type @b'@ from the next 'request' as its return value. -} respond :: (Monad m) => b -> p a' a b' b m b' {-| Compose two proxies blocked on a 'respond', generating a new proxy blocked on a 'respond' Begins from the downstream end and satisfies every 'request' with a 'respond' -} (>->) :: (Monad m) => (b' -> p a' a b' b m r) -> (c' -> p b' b c' c m r) -> (c' -> p a' a c' c m r) {-| Compose two proxies blocked on a 'request', generating a new proxy blocked on a 'request' Begins from the upstream end and satisfies every 'respond' with a 'request' -} (>~>) :: (Monad m) => (a -> p a' a b' b m r) -> (b -> p b' b c' c m r) -> (a -> p a' a c' c m r) {-| 'return_P' is identical to 'return', except with a more polymorphic constraint. -} return_P :: (Monad m) => r -> p a' a b' b m r {-| ('?>=') is identical to ('>>='), except with a more polymorphic constraint. -} (?>=) :: (Monad m) => p a' a b' b m r -> (r -> p a' a b' b m r') -> p a' a b' b m r' {-| 'lift_P' is identical to 'lift', except with a more polymorphic constraint. -} lift_P :: (Monad m) => m r -> p a' a b' b m r {-| 'hoist_P' is identical to 'hoist', except with a more polymorphic constraint. -} hoist_P :: (Monad m) => (forall r . m r -> n r) -> (p a' a b' b m r' -> p a' a b' b n r') {-| 'idT' forwards requests followed by responses > idT = request >=> respond >=> idT -} idT :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => a' -> p a' a a' a m r idT = go where go a' = request a' ?>= \a -> respond a ?>= \a'2 -> go a'2 -- idT = foreverK $ request >=> respond {-| 'coidT' forwards responses followed by requests > coidT = respond >=> request >=> coidT -} coidT :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => a -> p a' a a' a m r coidT = go where go a = respond a ?>= \a' -> request a' ?>= \a2 -> go a2 -- coidT = foreverK $ respond >=> request {-| Compose two proxies blocked on a 'respond', generating a new proxy blocked on a 'respond' Begins from the downstream end and satisfies every 'request' with a 'respond' -} (<-<) :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => (c' -> p b' b c' c m r) -> (b' -> p a' a b' b m r) -> (c' -> p a' a c' c m r) p1 <-< p2 = p2 >-> p1 {-| Compose two proxies blocked on a 'request', generating a new proxy blocked on a 'request' Begins from the upstream end and satisfies every 'respond' with a 'request' You don't need to use this. I include it only for symmetry. -} (<~<) :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => (b -> p b' b c' c m r) -> (a -> p a' a b' b m r) -> (a -> p a' a c' c m r) p1 <~< p2 = p2 >~> p1 -- | Two extra Proxy categories of theoretical interest class Interact p where -- | @f \\>\\ g@ replaces all 'request's in 'g' with 'f'. (\>\) :: (Monad m) => (b' -> p a' a x' x m b) -> (c' -> p b' b x' x m c) -> (c' -> p a' a x' x m c) -- | @f \/>\/ g@ replaces all 'respond's in 'f' with 'g'. (/>/) :: (Monad m) => (a -> p x' x b' b m a') -> (b -> p x' x c' c m b') -> (a -> p x' x c' c m a') -- | @f \/<\/ g@ replaces all 'request's in 'f' with 'g'. (/ (c' -> p b' b x' x m c) -> (b' -> p a' a x' x m b) -> (c' -> p a' a x' x m c) p1 /\ p1 -- | @f \\<\\ g@ replaces all 'respond's in 'g' with 'f'. (\<\) :: (Monad m, Interact p) => (b -> p x' x c' c m b') -> (a -> p x' x b' b m a') -> (a -> p x' x c' c m a') p1 \<\ p2 = p2 />/ p1 {- $laws The 'Proxy' class defines an interface to all core proxy capabilities that all proxy-like types must implement. First, all proxies must support a bidirectional flow of information, defined by: * ('>->') * ('>~>') * 'request' * 'respond' Intuitively, both @p1 >-> p2@ and @p1 >~> p2@ pair each 'request' in @p2@ with a 'respond' in @p1@. ('>->') accepts proxies blocked on 'respond' and begins from the downstream end, whereas ('>~>') accepts proxies blocked on 'request' and begins from the upstream end. Second, all proxies are monads, defined by: * 'return_P' * ('?>=') These must satify the monad laws using @(>>=) = (?>=)@ and @return = return_P@. Third, all proxies are monad transformers, defined by: * 'lift_P' This must satisfy the monad transformer laws, using @lift = lift_P@. Fourth, all proxies are functors in the category of monads, defined by: * 'hoist_P' This must satisfy the functor laws, using @hoist = hoist_P@. All 'Proxy' instances must satisfy these additional laws: * ('>->') and 'idT' form a category: > Define: idT = request >=> respond >=> idT > > idT >-> p = p > > p >-> idT = p > > (p1 >-> p2) >-> p3 = p1 >-> (p2 >-> p3) * ('>~>') and 'coidT' form a category: > Define: coidT = respond >=> request >=> coidT > > coidT >~> p = p > > p >~> coidT = p > > (p1 >~> p2) >~> p3 = p1 >~> (p2 >~> p3) * @(hoistK f)@ defines a functor between proxy categories: > Define: hoistK f = (hoist f .) > > hoistK f (p1 >-> p2) = hoistK f p1 >-> hoistK p2 > > hoistK f idT = idT > > hoistK f (p1 >~> p2) = hoistK f p1 >~> hoistK p2 > > hoistK f coidT = coidT Also, all proxies must satisfy the following 'Proxy' laws: > -- Define: liftK = (lift .) > > p1 >-> liftK f = liftK f > > p1 >-> (liftK f >=> respond >=> p2) = liftK f >=> respond >=> (p1 >-> p2) > > (liftK g >=> respond >=> p1) >-> (liftK f >=> request >=> liftK h >=> p2) > = liftK (f >=> g >=> h) >=> (p1 >-> p2) > > (liftK g >=> request >=> p1) >-> (liftK f >=> request >=> p2) > = liftK (f >=> g) >=> request >=> (p1 >~> p2) > > liftK f >~> p2 = liftK f > > (liftK f >=> request >=> p1) >~> p2 = liftK f >=> request >=> (p1 >~> p2) > > (liftK f >=> respond >=> liftK h >=> p1) >~> (liftK g >=> request >=> p2) > = liftK (f >=> g >=> h) >=> (p1 >~> p2) > > (liftK f >=> respond >=> p1) >~> (liftK g >=> respond >=> p2) > = liftK (f >=> g) >=> (p1 >-> p2) The 'Interact' class exists primarily for theoretical interest and to justify some of the functor laws for the 'ProxyTrans' type class. You will probably never use it. The 'Interact' class defines the ability to: * Replace existing 'request' commands using ('\>\') * Replace existing 'respond' commands using ('/>/') Laws: * ('\>\') and 'request' form a category: > request \>\ f = f > > f \>\ request = f > > (f \>\ g) \>\ h = f \>\ (g \>\ h) * ('/>/') and 'respond' form a category: > respond />/ f = f > > f />/ respond = f > > (f />/ g) />/ h = f />/ (g />/ h) Additionally, ('\>\') and ('/>/') distribute in one direction over Kleisli composition: > a \>\ (b >=> c) = (a \>\ b) >=> (a \>\ c) > > a \>\ return = return > (b >=> c) />/ a = (b />/ a) >=> (c />/ a) > > return />/ a = return -} {- $poly Many of these type classes contain methods which copy methods from more familiar type classes. These duplicate methods serve two purposes. First, this library requires type class instances that would otherwise be impossible to define without providing higher-kinded constraints. Rather than use the following illegal polymorphic constraint: > instance (forall a' a b' b . MonadTrans (p a' a b' b)) => ... ... the instance can instead use the following Haskell98 constraint: > instance (MonadTransP p) => ... Second, these type classes don't require the @FlexibleContexts@ extension to use and substantially clean up constraints in type signatures. They convert messy constraints like this: > p :: (MonadP (p a' a b' b m), MonadTrans (p a' a b' b)) => ... .. into cleaner and more general constraints like this: > P :: (Proxy p) => ... These type classes exist solely for internal plumbing and you should never directly use the duplicate methods from them. Instead, you can use all the original type classes as long as you embed your proxy code within at least one proxy transformer (or 'IdentityP' if don't use any transformers). The type-class machinery will then automatically convert the messier and less polymorphic constraints to the simpler and more general constraints. For example, consider the following almost-correct definition for @mapMD@ (from "Control.Proxy.Prelude.Base"): > import Control.Monad.Trans.Class > import Control.Proxy > > mapMD f = foreverK $ \a' -> do > a <- request a' > b <- lift (f a) > respond b The compiler infers the following messy constraint: > mapMD > :: (Monad m, Monad (p x a x b m), MonadTrans (p x a x b), Proxy p) > => (a -> m b) -> x -> p x a x b m r Instead, you can embed the code in the @IdentityP@ proxy transformer by wrapping it in 'runIdentityK': > -- |difference| > mapMD f = runIdentityK $ foreverK $ \a' -> do > a <- request a' > b <- lift (f a) > respond b ... and now the compiler collapses all the constraints into the 'Proxy' constraint: > mapMD :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => (a -> m b) -> x -> p x a x b m r You do not incur any performance penalty for writing polymorphic code or embedding it in 'IdentityP'. This library employs several rewrite @RULES@ which transform your polymorphic code into the equivalent type-specialized hand-tuned code. These rewrite rules fire very robustly and they do not require any assistance on your part from compiler pragmas like @INLINE@, @NOINLINE@ or @SPECIALIZE@. If you nest proxies within proxies: > example () = do > request () > lift $ request () > lift $ lift $ request () ... then you can still keep the nice constraints using: > example () = runIdentityP . hoist (runIdentityP . hoist runIdentityP) $ do > request () > lift $ request () > lift $ lift $ request () You don't need to use 'runIdentityP' \/ 'runIdentityK' if you use any other proxy transformers (In fact you can't, it's a type error). The following code example illustrates this, where the 'throw' command (from the 'EitherP' proxy transformer) suffices to guide the compiler to the cleaner type signature: > import Control.Monad > import Control.Proxy > import qualified Control.Proxy.Trans.Either as E > > example :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => () -> Producer (EitherP String p) Char m () > example () = do > c <- request () > when (c == ' ') $ E.throw "Error: received space" > respond c -} {-| The @(MonadPlusP p)@ constraint is equivalent to the following constraint: > (forall a' a b' b m . (Monad m) => MonadPlus (p a' a b' b m)) => ... -} class (Proxy p) => MonadPlusP p where mzero_P :: (Monad m) => p a' a b' b m r mplus_P :: (Monad m) => p a' a b' b m r -> p a' a b' b m r -> p a' a b' b m r {-| The @(MonadIOP p)@ constraint is equivalent to the following constraint: > (forall a' a b' b m . (MonadIO m) => MonadIO (p a' a b' b m)) => ... -} class (Proxy p) => MonadIOP p where liftIO_P :: (MonadIO m) => IO r -> p a' a b' b m r