Safe Haskell | None |
---|---|
Language | Haskell2010 |
Use turtle
if you want to write light-weight and maintainable shell
scripts.
turtle
embeds shell scripting directly within Haskell for three main
reasons:
- Haskell code is easy to refactor and maintain because the language is statically typed
- Haskell is syntactically lightweight, thanks to global type inference
- Haskell programs can be type-checked and interpreted very rapidly (< 1 second)
These features make Haskell ideal for scripting, particularly for replacing large and unwieldy Bash scripts.
This tutorial introduces how to use the turtle
library to write Haskell
scripts. This assumes no prior knowledge of Haskell, but does assume prior
knowledge of Bash or a similar shell scripting language.
If you are already proficient with Haskell, then you can get quickly up to speed by reading the Quick Start guide at the top of Turtle.Prelude.
If you are on Windows, the easiest way to follow along is to install Git for Windows and use the Git Bash program that it installs to get a fully featured Unix-like environment.
For all operating systems, the recommended way to compile and run the
following examples is to download the stack
package management tool by
following the instructions here:
https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack
... and then run the following instruction anywhere outside of a Haskell project:
$ stack install turtle
This tutorial will mostly focus on using Haskell as a scripting language.
The first two lines of each script below contain boilerplate instructions
so that stack
will load and run the script. This helps ensure that a
script will run on any computer that has a stack
executable, as stack
can install a Haskell compiler if one is not already present.
If you are curious about how these two lines work, they are described here:
https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/blob/master/doc/GUIDE.md#script-interpreter
If you want to make a Windows script independently executable outside of a
Git Bash environment, you can either (A) compile the script into an
executable or (B) run these two commands from a cmd
shell with
administrator privileges to make all *.hs
scripts executable:
assoc .hs=Haskell ftype Haskell="C:\path\to\stack.exe" "%1" %*
Introduction
Let's translate some simple Bash scripts to Haskell and work our way up to more complex scripts. Here is an example "Hello, world!" script written in both languages:
#!/usr/bin/env stack
-- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script
-- #!/bin/bash
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} --
--
import Turtle --
--
main = echo
"Hello, world!" -- echo Hello, world!
In Haskell you can use --
to comment out the rest of a line. The above
example uses comments to show the equivalent Bash script side-by-side with
the Haskell script.
You can execute the above code by saving it to the file example.hs
. If you
are copying and pasting the code, then remove the leading 1-space indent.
After you save the file, make the script executable and run the script:
$ chmod u+x example.hs $ ./example.hs Hello, world!
If you delete the first two lines of the program, you can also compile the above code to generate a native executable which will have a much faster startup time and improved performance:
$ # `-O2` turns on all optimizations $ # `-threaded` helps with piping shell output in and out of Haskell $ stack ghc -- -O2 -threaded example.hs $ ./example Hello, world!
You can even run Haskell code interactively using ghci
, which is an
interactive REPL for Haskell. You can either use ghci
by itself:
$ stack ghci <ghci links in some libraries> Prelude> :set -XOverloadedStrings Prelude> import Turtle Prelude Turtle> echo "Hello, world!" <ghci links in some libraries> Hello, world! Prelude Turtle> :quit $
From now on I'll omit ghci
's linker output in tutorial examples. You can
also silence this linker output by passing --ghc-options -v0
to
stack ghci
.
Comparison
You'll already notice a few differences between the Haskell code and Bash code.
First, the Haskell code requires two additional lines of overhead to import
the turtle
library and enable overloading of string literals. This
overhead is mostly unavoidable.
Second, the Haskell echo
explicitly quotes its string argument whereas the
Bash echo
does not. In Bash every token is a string by default and you
distinguish variables by prepending a dollar sign to them. In Haskell
the situation is reversed: every token is a variable by default and you
distinguish strings by quoting them. The following example highlights the
difference:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} -- -- import Turtle -- -- str = "Hello!" --STR=Hello! -- main = echo str --echo $STR
Third, you have to explicitly assign a subroutine to main
to specify which
subroutine to run when your program begins. This is because Haskell lets you
define things out of order. For example, we could have written our original
program this way instead:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle main = echo str str = "Hello, world!"
Notice how the above program defines str
after main
, which is valid.
Haskell does not care in what order you define top-level values or functions
(using the =
sign). However, the top level of a Haskell program only
permits definitions. If you were to insert a statement at the top-level:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle echo "Hello, world!"
... then you would get this error when you tried to run your program:
example.hs:7:1: Parse error: naked expression at top level
Subroutines
You can use do
notation to create a subroutine that runs more than one
command:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} -- -- import Turtle -- -- main = do -- echo "Line 1" -- echo Line 1 echo "Line 2" -- echo Line 2
$ ./example.hs Line 1 Line 2
do
blocks can use either use the indentation level to control their
duration or they can use curly braces and semicolons. To see the full rules
for do
syntax, read: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Indentation.
Some commands can return a value, and you can store the result of a command
using the <-
symbol. For example, the following program prints the
creation time of the current working directory by storing two intermediate
results:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash import Turtle -- -- main = do -- dir <-pwd
-- DIR=$(pwd) time <-datefile
dir -- TIME=$(date -r $DIR)
$ ./example.hs 2015-01-24 03:40:31 UTC
The main difference between =
and <-
is that:
- The
<-
symbol is overloaded and its meaning is context-dependent; in this context it just means "store the current result" - The
=
symbol is not overloaded and always means that the two sides of the equality are interchangeable
do
notation lets you combine smaller subroutines into larger subroutines.
For example, we could refactor the above code to split the first two commands
into their own smaller subroutine and then invoke that smaller subroutine
within a larger subroutine:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash import Turtle -- -- datePwd = do -- datePwd() { dir <- pwd -- DIR=$(pwd) result <- datefile dir -- RESULT=$(date -r $DIR) return result -- echo $RESULT -- } main = do -- time <- datePwd -- TIME=$(datePwd) print time -- echo $TIME
The refactored program still returns the exact same result:
$ ./example.hs 2015-01-24 03:40:31 UTC
We can also simplify the code a little bit because do
notation implicitly
returns the value of the last command within a subroutine. We can use this
trick to simplify both the Haskell and Bash code:
datePwd = do -- datePwd() { dir <- pwd -- DIR=$(pwd) datefile dir -- date -r $DIR -- }
However, keep in mind that the return
statement is something of a misnomer
since it does not break or exit from the surrounding subroutine. All it
does is create a trivial subroutine that has no side effects and returns its
argument as its result. If you return
an expression, you're just giving
it a new name:
do x <- return expr -- X=EXPR command x -- command $X -- Same as: command expr -- command EXPR
In fact, the first line is equivalent to let x = expr
, which more closely
mirrors the equivalent Bash syntax:
do let x = expr -- X=EXPR command x -- command $X -- Same as: command expr -- command EXPR
Also, for a subroutine with a single command, you can omit the do
:
main = do echo "Hello, world!" -- Same as: main = echo "Hello, world!"
Types
Notice how the above Haskell example used print
instead of echo
. Run the
following script to find out what happens if we choose echo
instead:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script import Turtle main = do dir <- pwd time <- datefile dir echo time
If we run that we get a type error:
$ ./example.hs example.hs:8:10: Couldn't match expected type `Line' with actual type `UTCTime' In the first argument of `echo', namely `time' In a stmt of a 'do' block: echo time In the expression: do { dir <- pwd; time <- datefile dir; echo time }
The error points to the last line of our program: (example.hs:8:10)
means
line 8, column 10 of our program. If you study the error message closely
you'll see that the echo
function expects a Line
value (a piece of text
without newlines), but we passed it 'time'
, which was a UTCTime
value.
Although the error is at the end of our script, Haskell catches this error
before even running the script. When we "interpret" a Haskell script the
Haskell compiler actually compiles the script without any optimizations to
generate a temporary executable and then runs the executable, much like Perl
does for Perl scripts.
You might wonder: "where are the types?" None of the above programs had any type signatures or type annotations, yet the compiler still detected type errors correctly. This is because Haskell uses "global type inference" to detect errors, meaning that the compiler can infer the types of expressions within the program without any assistance from the programmer.
You can even ask the compiler what the type of an expression is using ghci
.
Let's open up the REPL and import this library so that we can study the types
and deduce why our program failed:
$ stack ghci Prelude> import Turtle Prelude Turtle>
You can interrogate the REPL for an expression's type using the :type
command:
Prelude Turtle> :type pwd pwd ::MonadIO
io => io Turtle.FilePath
For right now, ignore all occurrences of MonadIO
and just read the type
as:
Prelude Turtle> :type pwd pwd ::IO
Turtle.FilePath
We will cover MonadIO
later on.
Whenever you see something of the form (x :: t)
, that means that 'x'
is a value of type 't'
. The REPL says that pwd
is a subroutine (IO
)
that returns a FilePath
. The Turtle prefix before
FilePath
is just the module name since the FilePath
exported by the turtle
library conflicts with the default FilePath
exported by Haskell's Prelude
. The compiler uses the fully qualified name,
Turtle.
, to avoid ambiguity.FilePath
We can similarly ask for the type of datefile
:
Prelude Turtle> :type datefile datefile :: Turtle.FilePath
->IO
UTCTime
datefile
is a function whose argument must be a FilePath
and whose
result is a subroutine (IO
) that returns a UTCTime
. Notice how the
input argument of datefile
(which is a FilePath
) is the same type
as the return value of pwd
(also a FilePath
).
Now let's study type of echo
to see why we get the type error:
Prelude Turtle> :type echo echo ::Line
->IO
()
The above type says that echo
is a function whose argument is a value of
type Line
and whose result is a subroutine (IO
) with an empty return
value (denoted '()'
).
Line
is a wrapper around Text
and represents a Text
value with no
internal newlines:
newtypeLine
=Line
Text
Now we can understand the type error: echo
expects a Line
argument but
datefile
returns a UTCTime
, which is not the same thing. Unlike Bash,
not everything is Text
in Haskell and the compiler will not cast or coerce
types for you.
The reason print
worked is because print
has a more general type than
echo
:
Prelude Turtle> :type print print ::Show
a => a ->IO
()
This type signature says that print
can display any value of type 'a'
so long as 'a'
implements the Show
interface. In this case UTCTime
does implement the Show
interface, so everything works out when we use
print
.
This library provides a helper function that lets you convert any type that
implements Show
into any other type that implements IsString
:
-- This behaves like Python's `repr` functionrepr
:: (Show
a,IsString
b) => a -> b
You could therefore implement print
in terms of echo
and repr
:
print x = echo (repr x)
Shell
You can use ghci
for more than just inferring types. ghci
is a
general-purpose Haskell shell for your system when you extend it with
turtle
:
$ stack ghci Prelude> :set -XOverloadedStrings Prelude> import Turtle Prelude Turtle>cd
"/tmp" Prelude Turtle>pwd
FilePath "/tmp" Prelude Turtle>mkdir
"test" Prelude Turtle>cd
"test" Prelude Turtle>touch
"file" Prelude Turtle>testfile
"file" True Prelude Turtle>rm
"file" Prelude Turtle>testfile
"file" False
You can also optionally configure ghci
to run the first two commands every
time you launch ghci
. Just create a .ghci
within your current directory
with these two lines:
:set -XOverloadedStrings import Turtle
The following ghci
examples will all assume that you run these two commands
at the beginning of every session, either manually or automatically. You can
even enable those two commands permanently by adding the above .ghci
file
to your home directory.
Within ghci
you can run a subroutine and ghci
will print
the
subroutine's value if it is not empty:
Prelude Turtle>shell
"true" empty ExitSuccess Prelude Turtle>shell
"false" empty ExitFailure 1
You can also type in a pure expression and ghci
will evaluate that
expression:
Prelude Turtle> 2 + 2
4
Prelude Turtle> "123" <>
"456" -- (<>) concatenates strings
"123456"
This works because ghci
automatically wraps anything that's not a
subroutine with print
. It's as if we had written:
Prelude Turtle> print (2 + 2) 4 Prelude Turtle> print ("123" <> "456") "123456"
Type signatures
Haskell performs global type inference, meaning that the compiler never requires any type signatures. When you add type signatures, they are purely for the benefit of the programmer and behave like machine-checked documentation.
Let's illustrate this by adding types to our original script:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script import Turtle datePwd :: IO UTCTime -- Type signature datePwd = do dir <- pwd datefile dir main :: IO () -- Type signature main = do time <- datePwd print time
The first type signature says that datePwd
is a subroutine that returns a
UTCTime
:
-- +----- A subroutine ... -- | -- | +-- ... that returns `UTCTime` -- | | -- v v datePwd :: IO UTCTime
The second type signature says that main
is a subroutine that returns an
empty value:
-- +----- A subroutine ... -- | -- | +-- ... that returns an empty value (i.e. `()`) -- | | -- v v main :: IO ()
Not every top-level value has to be a subroutine, though. For example, you
can define unadorned Line
values at the top-level, as we saw previously:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle str :: Line str = "Hello!" main :: IO () main = echo str
These type annotations do not assist the compiler. Instead, the compiler independently infers the type and then checks whether it matches the documented type. If there is a mismatch the compiler will raise a type error.
Let's test this out by providing an incorrect type for 'str'
:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle str :: Int str = "Hello!" main :: IO () main = echo str
If you run that script, you will get two error messages:
$ ./example.hs example.hs:8:7: No instance for (IsString Int) arising from the literal `"Hello, world!"' Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (IsString Int) In the expression: "Hello, world!" In an equation for `str': str = "Hello, world!" example.hs:11:13: Couldn't match expected type `Line' with actual type `Int' In the first argument of `echo', namely `str' In the expression: echo str In an equation for `main': main = echo str
The first error message relates to the OverloadedStrings
extensions. When
we enable OverloadedStrings
the compiler overloads string literals,
interpreting them as any type that implements the IsString
interface. The
error message says that Int
does not implement the IsString
interface so
the compiler cannot interpret a string literal as an Int
. On the other
hand the Text
, Line
and FilePath
types do implement IsString
,
which is why we can interpret string literals as Text
, Line
or
FilePath
values.
The second error message says that echo
expects a Line
value, but we
declared str
to be an Int
, so the compiler aborts compilation, requiring
us to either fix or delete our type signature.
Notice that there is nothing wrong with the program other than the type signature we added. If we were to delete the type signature the program would compile and run correctly. The sole purpose of this type signature is for us to communicate our expectations to the compiler so that the compiler can alert us if the code does not match our expectations.
Let's also try reversing the type error, providing a number where we expect a string:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle str :: Line str = 4 main :: IO () main = echo str
This gives a different error:
$ ./example.hs example.hs:8:7: No instance for (Num Line) arising from the literal `4' Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num Line) In the expression: 4 In an equation for `str': str = 4
Haskell also automatically overloads numeric literals, too. The compiler
interprets integer literals as any type that implements the Num
interface.
The Line
type does not implement the Num
interface, so we cannot
interpret integer literals as Line
strings.
System
You can invoke arbitrary shell commands using the shell
command. For
example, we can write a program that creates an empty directory and then
uses a shell
command to archive the directory:
#!/usr/bin/env stack
-- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script
-- #!/bin/bash
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} --
--
import Turtle --
--
main = do --
mkdir "test" -- mkdir test
shell
"tar czf test.tar.gz test" empty -- tar czf test.tar.gz test
If you run this program, it will generate the test.tar.gz
archive:
$ ./example.hs ExitSuccess $ echo $? 0 $ ls test.tar.gz test.tar.gz
Like ghci
, the runhaskell
command running our script prints any non-empty
result of the main
subroutine (ExitSuccess
in this case).
The easiest way to learn a new command like shell
is to view its
documentation. Click on the word shell
, which will take you to
documentation that looks like this:
shell
:: Text -- Command line -> Shell Line -- Standard input (as lines of `Text`) -> IOExitCode
-- Exit code of the shell command
The first argument is a Text
representation of the command to run. The
second argument lets you feed input to the command, and you can provide
empty
for now to feed no input.
The final result is an ExitCode
, which you can use to detect whether the
command completed successfully. For example, we could print a more
descriptive error message if an external command fails:
#!/usr/bin/env stack
-- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
import Turtle
main = do
let cmd = "false"
x <- shell cmd empty
case x of
ExitSuccess -> return ()
ExitFailure n -> die
(cmd <> " failed with exit code: " <> repr n)
This prints an error message since the false
command always fails:
$ ./example.hs example.hs: user error (false failed with exit code: 1)
You should also check out the proc
command, which is less powerful but
safer since it decreases the likelihood of code injection or malformed
commands:
proc
:: Text -- Program
-> [Text] -- Arguments
-> Shell Line -- Standard input (as lines of `Text`)
-> IO ExitCode -- Exit code of the shell command
Most of the commands in this library do not actually invoke an external shell or program. Instead, they indirectly wrap other Haskell libraries that bind to C code.
Also, some people prefer that subprocess runners throw exceptions instead of
returning an ExitCode
. procs
and shells
are the exception-throwing
variations on proc
and shell
.
String formatting
This library provides type-safe string formatting utilities, too. For example, instead of writing this:
cmd <> " failed with exit code: " <> repr n
... you could format the string using printf
style instead:
format (s%" failed with exit code: "%d) cmd n
What's neat is that the compiler will automatically infer the number of
arguments and their types from the Format
string:
$ stack ghci Prelude Turtle> :type format (s%" failed with exit code: "%d) format (s%" failed with exit code: "%d) :: Text -> Int -> Text
The compiler deduces that the above Format
string requires one argument of
type Text
to satisfy the s
at the beginning of the format string and
another argument of type Int
to satisfy the d
at the end of the format
string.
Note that this is also the idiomatic way to convert a FilePath
to Text
:
format fp :: FilePath -> Text
For the very common case where you echo
a formatted value, you can use
printf
:
>>>
printf ("Hello, "%s%"!\n") "world"
Hello, world!
If you are interested in this feature, check out the Turtle.Format module
for more details. For more complex string formatting needs, check out the
text-format
library.
Streams
The turtle
library provides support for streaming computations, just like
Bash. The primitive turtle
streams are little more verbose than their
Bash counterparts, but turtle
streams can be built and combined in more
ways.
The key type for streams is the Shell
type, which represents a stream of
values. For example, the ls
function has a streaming result:
Prelude Turtle> :typels
ls
:: Turtle.FilePath ->Shell
Turtle.FilePath
That type says that ls
takes a single FilePath
as its argument
(the directory to list) and the result is a Shell
stream of
FilePath
s (the immediate children of that directory).
You can't run a Shell
stream directly within ghci
. You will get a type
error like this if you try:
Prelude Turtle> ls "/tmp" <interactive>:2:1: No instance for (Show (Shell Turtle.FilePath)) arising from a use of `print' Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (Shell Turtle.FilePath)) In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it
Instead, you must consume the stream as it is generated and the simplest way
to consume a Shell
stream is view
:
view
:: Show a => Shell a -> IO ()
view
takes any Shell
stream of values and print
s them to standard
output:
Prelude Turtle> view (ls "/tmp") FilePath "/tmp/.X11-unix" FilePath "/tmp/.X0-lock" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PKdhtXMmr18n" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-xHYcZ3zmN3Fv" FilePath "/tmp/tracker-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PYi1hSlWgNj2" FilePath "/tmp/orbit-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/ssh-vREYGbWGpiCa" FilePath "/tmp/.ICE-unix
You can build your own Shell
streams using a few primitive operations,
The first primitive is empty
, which represents an empty stream of values:
Prelude Turtle> view empty
-- Outputs nothing
Prelude Turtle>
Another way to say that is:
view empty
= return ()
The type of empty is:
empty
:: Shell a
The lower-case 'a'
is "polymorphic", meaning that it will type check as
any type. That means that you can produce an empty
stream of any type of
value.
The next simplest function is return
, which lets you take any value and
transform it into a singleton Shell
that emits just that one value:
Prelude Turtle> view (return
1)
1
Another way to say that is:
view (return
x) = print x
The type of return
is:
return
:: a -> Shell a
Notice that this is the same return
function we saw before. This is
because return
is overloaded and works with both IO
and Shell
.
You can also take any subroutine (IO
) and transform it into a singleton
Shell
:
Prelude Turtle> view (liftIO
readline)
ABC<Enter>
Just (Line ABC)
Another way to say that is:
view (liftIO
io) = do x <- io
print x
The type of liftIO
is:
liftIO
:: IO a -> Shell a
Once you have those primitive Shell
streams you can begin to combine them
into larger Shell
streams. For example, you can concatenate two Shell
streams using (<|>
):
view (return 1 <|>
return 2)
1
2
Another way to say that is:
view (xs <|>
ys) = do view xs
view ys
The type of (<|>
) is:
(<|>
) :: Shell a -> Shell a -> Shell a
In other words, you can concatenate two Shell
streams of the same element
type to get a new Shell
stream, also of the same element type.
Let's try using (<|>
) on two real streams:
Prelude Turtle> view (ls "/tmp" <|> ls "/usr") FilePath "/tmp/.X11-unix" FilePath "/tmp/.X0-lock" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PKdhtXMmr18n" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-xHYcZ3zmN3Fv" FilePath "/tmp/tracker-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PYi1hSlWgNj2" FilePath "/tmp/orbit-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/ssh-vREYGbWGpiCa" FilePath "/tmp/.ICE-unix" FilePath "/usr/lib" FilePath "/usr/src" FilePath "/usr/sbin" FilePath "/usr/include" FilePath "/usr/share" FilePath "/usr/games" FilePath "/usr/local" FilePath "/usr/bin"
Finally, note that Shell
implements the IsString
interface, so a string
literal will type-check as a Shell
that emits a single Text
value:
Prelude Turtle> view "123" "123" Prelude Turtle> view (return "123") -- Same thing "123" Prelude Turtle> view ("123" <|> "456") "123" "456" Prelude Turtle> view (return "123" <|> return "456") -- Same thing "123" "456"
Loops
This library also provides the select
function for conveniently emitting a
list of values:
Prelude Turtle> view (select
[1, 2, 3])
1
2
3
We can use select
to implement loops within a Shell
:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} -- -- import Turtle -- -- example = do -- x <- select [1, 2] -- for x in 1 2; do y <- select [3, 4] -- for y in 3 4; do liftIO (print (x, y)) -- echo \(${x},${y}\); -- done; main = sh example -- done
That will print
every permutation of 'x'
and 'y'
:
$ ./example (1,3) (1,4) (2,3) (2,4)
This uses the sh
utility instead of view
. The only difference is that
sh
doesn't print any values (since print
is doing that already):
sh
:: Shell a -> IO ()
This trick isn't limited to select
. You can loop over the output of any
Shell
by just binding its result. For example, this is how view
loops
over its argument:
view :: Show a => Shell a -> IO () view s = sh (do x <- s -- `x` ranges over every output of `s` liftIO (print x) )
You can also loop over a stream in a one-liner, still using do
notation.
Just insert semi-colons between statements:
Prelude Turtle> -- for file in /tmp/*; do echo $file; done Prelude Turtle> sh (do file <- ls "/tmp"; liftIO (print file)) FilePath "/tmp/.X11-unix" FilePath "/tmp/.X0-lock" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PKdhtXMmr18n" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-xHYcZ3zmN3Fv" FilePath "/tmp/tracker-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PYi1hSlWgNj2" FilePath "/tmp/orbit-gabriel" FilePath "/tmp/ssh-vREYGbWGpiCa" FilePath "/tmp/.ICE-unix"
You can filter streams using Control.Monad.
, like
this:mfilter
>>>
view (select [1..10])
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10>>>
view (mfilter even (select [1..10]))
2 4 6 8 10
This works because mfilter
's implementation is equivalent to:
mfilter predicate stream = do element <- stream if predicate element then return element else empty
In other words, mfilter
loops over each element
of the
stream
and only return
s the element if the predicate
is True
Folds
There are other ways you can consume a Shell
stream. For example, you can
fold
the stream using predefined Fold
s from Control.Foldl:
Prelude Turtle> import qualified Control.Foldl as Fold
Prelude Turtle Fold> fold
(ls "/tmp") Fold.length
9
Prelude Turtle Fold> fold
(ls "/tmp") Fold.head
Just (FilePath "/tmp/.X11-unix")
Prelude Turtle Fold> fold
(ls "/tmp") Fold.list
[FilePath "/tmp/.X11-unix",FilePath "/tmp/.X0-lock",FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PKd
htXMmr18n",FilePath "/tmp/pulse-xHYcZ3zmN3Fv",FilePath "/tmp/tracker-gabriel
",FilePath "/tmp/pulse-PYi1hSlWgNj2",FilePath "/tmp/orbit-gabriel",FilePath
"/tmp/ssh-vREYGbWGpiCa",FilePath "/tmp/.ICE-unix"]
You can also compute multiple things in a single pass over the stream:
Prelude Turtle> fold (select [1..10]) ((,) <$> Fold.minimum <*> Fold.maximum) (Just 1,Just 10)
If you are interested in this feature, check out the documentation in Control.Foldl.
Input and output
turtle
comes with built-in support for the standard text streams.
For example, you can write to standard output using the stdout
utility:
stdout
:: Shell Line -> IO ()stdout
s = sh (do txt <- s liftIO (echo txt) )
stdout
outputs each Line
value on its own line:
Prelude Turtle> stdout "Line 1" Line 1 Prelude Turtle> stdout ("Line 1" <|> "Line 2") Line 1 Line 2
Another useful stream is stdin
, which emits one Line
value per line of
standard input:
stdin
:: Shell Line
Let's combine stdin
and stdout
to forward all input from standard input
to standard output:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- #!/bin/bash {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} -- -- import Turtle -- -- main = stdout stdin -- cat
If you run that it will continue to echo lines until you signal end of input
using Ctrl-D
:
$ ./example.hs ABC<Enter> ABC Test<Enter> Test 42<Enter> 42 <Ctrl-D> $
You can also read and write to files using the input
and output
utilities:
Prelude Turtle>output
"file.txt" ("Test" <|> "ABC" <|> "42") Prelude Turtle> stdout (input
"file.txt") Test ABC 42
External commands
You can embed external shell commands as streams within your Haskell program.
For example, suppose that we want to use the system's built in ls
command.
We can just run:
Prelude Turtle> stdout (inshell "ls" empty) .X11-unix .X0-lock pulse-PKdhtXMmr18n pulse-xHYcZ3zmN3Fv tracker-gabriel pulse-PYi1hSlWgNj2 orbit-gabriel ssh-vREYGbWGpiCa .ICE-unix
This works because type of inshell
is:
inshell
:: Text -- Command line
-> Shell Line -- Standard input to feed to program
-> Shell Line -- Standard output produced by program
This means you can use inshell
to embed arbitrary external utilities as
first class streams within your Haskell program:
Turtle Prelude> stdout (inshell "awk '{ print $1 }'" "123 456") 123
You should also check out the inproc
command, which is less powerful but
safer since it decreases the likelihood of code injection or malformed
commands:
inproc
:: Text -- Program
-> [Text] -- Arguments
-> Shell Line -- Standard input to feed to program
-> Shell Line -- Standard output produced by program
Using inproc
, you would write:
Turtle Prelude> stdout (inproc "awk" ["{ print $1 }"] "123 456") 123
Patterns
You can transform streams using Unix-like utilities. For example, you can
filter a stream using grep
.
Prelude Turtle> stdout (input "file.txt")
Test
ABC
42
Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep
"ABC" (input "file.txt"))
ABC
Let's look at the type of grep
:
grep
:: Pattern a -> Shell Line -> Shell Line
The first argument of grep
is actually a Pattern
, which implements
IsString
. When we pass a string literal we just create a Pattern
that
matches the given literal.
Pattern
s generalize regular expressions and you can use this table to
roughly translate several regular expression idioms to Pattern
s:
Regex Pattern ========= ========= "string" "string" .dot
e1 e2 e1<>
e2 e1 | e2 e1<|>
e2 e*star
e e+plus
e e*?selfless
(star
e) e+?selfless
(plus
e) e{n}count
n e e{m,n}bounded
m n e e{0,n}upperBounded
n e e?optional
e [xyz]oneOf
"xyz" [^xyz]noneOf
"xyz"
Here are some examples:
Prelude Turtle> -- grep '^[[:digit:]]\+$' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep (plus digit) (input "file.txt")) 42 Prelude Turtle> -- grep '^[[:digit:]]\+\|Test$' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep (plus digit <|> "Test") (input "file.txt")) Test 42
Note that turtle
's grep
subtly differs from the traditional grep
command. The Pattern
you provide must match the entire line. If you
want to match the interior of a line, you can use the has
utility:
Prelude Turtle> -- grep B file.txt
Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep (has
"B") (input "file.txt"))
ABC
You can also use prefix
or suffix
to match the beginning or end of a
string, respectively:
Prelude Turtle> -- grep '^A' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep (prefix
"A") (input "file.txt")) ABC Prelude Turtle> -- grep 'C$' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (grep (suffix
"C") (input "file.txt")) ABC
sed
also uses Pattern
s, too, and is more flexible than Unix sed
:
Prelude Turtle> -- sed 's/C/D/g' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (sed
("C"*>
return "D") (input "file.txt")) Test ABD 42 Prelude Turtle> -- sed 's/[[:digit:]]/!/g' file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (sed
(digit*>
return "!") (input "file.txt")) Test ABC !! Prelude Turtle> import qualified Data.Text as Text Prelude Turtle> -- rev file.txt Prelude Turtle> stdout (sed
(fmap
Text.reverse (plus dot)) (input "file.txt")) tseT CBA 24 Prelude Turtle>
You can also use Pattern
s by themselves to parse arbitrary text into more
structured values:
Prelude Turtle> let pair = do x <-decimal
; " "; y <-decimal
; return (x, y) Prelude Turtle> :type pair pair ::Pattern
(Integer, Integer) Prelude Turtle>match
pair "123 456" [(123,456)] Prelude Turtle> data Pet = Cat | Dog deriving (Show) Prelude Turtle> let pet = ("cat" *> return Cat) <|> ("dog" *> return Dog) ::Pattern
Pet Prelude Turtle>match
pet "dog" [Dog] Prelude Turtle>match
(pet `sepBy
` ",") "cat,dog,cat" [[Cat,Dog,Cat]]
See the Turtle.Pattern module for more details if you are interested in
writing more complex Pattern
s.
Exception Safety
Sometimes you may want to acquire resources and ensure they get released
correctly if there are any exceptions. You can use Managed
resources to
acquire things safely within a Shell
.
You can think of a Managed
resource as some resource that needs to be
acquired and then released afterwards. Example: you want to create a
temporary file and then guarantee it's deleted afterwards, even if the
program fails with an exception.
Turtle.Prelude provides two Managed
utilities for creating temporary
directories or files:
mktempdir
:: FilePath -- Parent directory -> Text -- Directory name template ->Managed
FilePath -- Temporary directory
mktemp
:: FilePath -- Parent directory -> Text -- File name template ->Managed
(FilePath, Handle) -- Temporary file
You can acquire a Managed
resource within a Shell
with using
:
using
:: Managed a -> Shell a
... and here is an example of creating a temporary directory and file within
a Shell
:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle main = sh (do dir <- using (mktempdir "/tmp" "turtle") (file, _) <- using (mktemp dir "turtle") liftIO (print file) )
When you run the above script it will print out the name of the temporary directory and file:
$ ./example.hs FilePath "/tmp/turtle15976/turtle15976"
... and you can verify that they were deleted afterwards:
Turtle Prelude> view (find (has "turtle") "/tmp") Turtle Prelude> -- No results
As an exercise, try inserting an exception and verifying that the temporary: file and directory are still cleaned up correctly:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle main = sh (do dir <- using (mktempdir "/tmp" "turtle") (file, _) <- using (mktemp dir "turtle") liftIO (print file) liftIO (die "Urk!") )
To learn more about Managed
resources, read the documentation in
Control.Monad.Managed.
MonadIO
If you are sick of having type liftIO
everywhere, you can omit it. This
is because all subroutines in turtle
are overloaded using the MonadIO
type class, like our original pwd
command where we first encountered the
the MonadIO
type:
Prelude Turtle> :type pwd pwd ::MonadIO
io => io Turtle.FilePath
This means this command is overloaded to run in any context that
implements the MonadIO
interface, including:
You can tell if a type constructor like Shell
implements MonadIO
by
clicking the link to the type constructor and looking for the instance list.
There you will see a list of instances like:
Monad Shell Functor Shell MonadPlus Shell Applicative Shell Alternative Shell MonadIO Shell MonadManaged Shell ...
These instances represent the overloaded functions associated with Shell
and we can see from the list that Shell
implements MonadIO
so we can
use pwd
(or any other subroutine in this library) within a Shell
.
However, not all subroutines in the Haskell ecosystem are overloaded in this
way (such as print
), so you will still occasionally need to wrap
subroutines in liftIO
.
MonadManaged
All Managed
operations are also overloaded in turtle
, meaning that you
can omit the using
command. For example, we could change our last example
to:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle main = sh (do dir <- mktempdir "/tmp" "turtle" (file, _) <- mktemp dir "turtle" liftIO (print file) die "Urk!" )
Any command that is generalized over the MonadManaged
interface can run
in the following contexts:
Command line options
The Turtle.Options module lets you easily parse command line arguments, using either flags or positional arguments.
For example, if you want to write a cp
-like script that takes two
positional arguments for the source and destination file, you can write:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script -- cp.hs {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle import Prelude hiding (FilePath) parser :: Parser (FilePath, FilePath) parser = (,) <$> argPath "src" "The source file" <*> argPath "dest" "The destination file" main = do (src, dest) <- options "A simple `cp` utility" parser cp src dest
If you run the script without any arguments, you will get an auto-generated usage output:
$ ./cp.hs Usage: cp.hs SRC DEST
... and you can get a more descriptive output if you supply the --help
flag:
$ ./cp.hs --help A simple `cp` utility Usage: cp.hs SRC DEST Available options: -h,--help Show this help text SRC The source file DEST The destination file
... and the script works as expected if you provide both arguments:
echo "Test" > file1.txt $ ./cp.hs file1.txt file2.txt cat file2.txt Test
This works because argPath
produces a Parser
:
argPath :: ArgName -> Optional HelpMessage -> Parser FilePath
... and multiple Parser
s can be combined into a single Parser
using
operations from the Applicative
type class since the Parser
type
implements the Applicative
interface:
instance Applicative Parser
You can also make any argument optional using the optional
utility
provided by Applicative
:
optional
::Alternative
f => f a -> f (Maybe a)
For example, we can change our program to make the destination argument
optional, defaulting to stdout
if the user does not provide a destination:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle import Prelude hiding (FilePath) parser :: Parser (FilePath, Maybe FilePath) parser = (,) <$> argPath "src" "The source file" <*> optional (argPath "dest" "The destination file") main = do (src, mDest) <- options "A simple `cp` utility" parser case mDest of Nothing -> input src & stdout Just dest -> cp src dest
Now the auto-generated usage information correctly indicates that the second argument is optional:
$ ./cp.hs Usage: cp.hs SRC [DEST] $ ./cp.hs --help A simple `cp` utility Usage: cp.hs SRC [DEST] Available options: -h,--help Show this help text SRC The source file DEST The destination file
... and if we omit the argument the result goes to standard output:
$ ./cp.hs file1.txt Test
We can use the optional
utility because the Parser
type also implements
the Alternative
interface:
instance Alternative Parser
We can also specify arguments on the command lines using flags instead of
specifying them positionally. Let's change our example to specify the
input and output using the --src
and --dest
flags, using -s
and -d
as short-hands for the flags:
#!/usr/bin/env stack -- stack --resolver lts-10.2 script {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle import Prelude hiding (FilePath) parser :: Parser (FilePath, FilePath) parser = (,) <$> optPath "src" 's' "The source file" <*> optPath "dest" 'd' "The destination file" main = do (src, dest) <- options "A simple `cp` utility" parser cp src dest
This now lets us specify the arguments in terms of flags:
$ ./cp Usage: cp.hs (-s|--src SRC) (-d|--dest DEST) $ ./cp --help A simple `cp` utility Usage: cp.hs (-s|--src SRC) (-d|--dest DEST) Available options: -h,--help Show this help text -s,--src SRC The source file -d,--dest DEST The destination file $ ./cp --src file1.txt --dest file3.txt $ cat file3.txt Test
You can also provide subcommand
functionality such as the following
example which pretends to increase or decrease the system volume:
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} import Turtle data Command = IncreaseVolume Int | DecreaseVolume Int deriving (Show) parser :: Parser Command parser = fmap IncreaseVolume (subcommand "up" "Turn the volume up" (argInt "amount" "How much to increase the volume") ) <|> fmap DecreaseVolume (subcommand "down" "Turn the volume down" (argInt "amount" "How much to decrease the volume") ) main = do x <- options "Volume adjuster" parser case x of IncreaseVolume n -> printf ("Increasing the volume by "%d%"\n") n DecreaseVolume n -> printf ("Decreasing the volume by "%d%"\n") n
This will provide `--help` output at both the top level and for each subcommand:
$ ./options --help Volume adjuster Usage: options (up | down) Available options: -h,--help Show this help text Available commands: up down $ ./options up --help Turn the volume up Usage: options up AMOUNT Available options: -h,--help Show this help text AMOUNT How much to increase the volume $ ./options up 10 Increasing the volume by 10
See the Turtle.Options module for more details and utilities related to
parsing command line options. This module is built on top of the
optparse-applicative
library, which provides even more extensive
functionality.
Conclusion
By this point you should be able to write basic shell scripts in Haskell. If you would like to learn more advanced tricks, take the time to read the documentation in these modules:
If you have more questions or need help learning the library, ask a question
on Stack Overflow under the haskell-turtle
tag. For bugs or feature
requests, create an issue on Github at
https://github.com/Gabriel439/Haskell-Turtle-Library/issues
This library provides an extended suite of Unix-like utilities, but would still benefit from adding more utilities for better parity with the Unix ecosystem. Pull requests to add new utilities are highly welcome!
FAQ
These are the most frequently asked questions from new users:
Question: My program hangs when I run a subprocess that reads from standard input. What do I do?
Answer: Make sure you compile your program with the -threaded
flag
Question: How do I convert FilePath
to Text
?
Question: My program prints some extra output every time it starts. How do I remove it?
Answer: Compile your program and run the executable instead of interpreting the program.
Question: How do I transform a (
into a Pattern
a)(
?Pattern
[a])
Answer: Use many
or some
(both are from Control.Applicative and
re-exported by Turtle)
Question: Why are star
/ plus
not the same as many
/ some
?
Answer: Because [Char]
is a String
, which is not the same thing as
Text
. String
is deprecated in favor of Text
in modern Haskell code,
primarily for performance reasons and also because Text
provides better
support for Unicode.
Question: Some Haskell libraries still use String
. How do I convert
back and forth between String
and Text
?
Answer: Use Data.Text.
and
pack
Data.Text.
unpack
Question: What's the easiest way to fail with a descriptive error message
if a subprocess command like proc
/shell
returns a non-zero exit code?
code?
Answer: Use (
or
procs
cmd args input)(
(or
proc
cmd args input .||.
die
"Descriptive error message")shell
/ shells
, respectively)
Question: How do I close a resource that I acquired?
Answer: Use runManaged
, sh
, or (<|>
) (all resources acquired in the
left stream will close before beginning the right stream). Alternatively,
use with
to acquire a resource for a limited scope.
Question: How do I use turtle
to run another shell as a subprocess?
Answer: Use system
in conjunction with the process
library,
like this:
Turtle.system (System.Process.proc "/bin/sh" []) empty